12/19 Gosselin Chat

[carphalen5150]

lol

Aww.. you're gonna hurt my feelings with that kind of talk.

What about anything i said in the last couple posts did you not understand big guy?

I understood you clearly. You really had no opinion on the topic at hand and were basically just trolling. The point that was being discussed was a switch to a 4-3 and the wear and tear on Ware. If you have an opinion on that it would be great to hear, but instead you are hung up on something that has nothing to do with the initial topic.

 

[RoyTheHammer]

I understood you clearly. You really had no opinion on the topic at hand and were basically just trolling. The point that was being discussed was a switch to a 4-3 and the wear and tear on Ware. If you have an opinion on that it would be great to hear, but instead you are hung up on something that has nothing to do with the initial topic.

Actually, i was pointing out the inconsistency's of one poster's replies, which really had nothing to do with you at all.

As for my opinion on the actual topic, i made that clear when i quoted your simple reply to the subject and said "bingo", indicating complete agreement. You possibly missed that, i can go back and quote that for you too if you'd like.

 

[carphalen5150]

Actually, i was pointing out the inconsistency's of one poster's replies, which really had nothing to do with you at all.

As for my opinion on the actual topic, i made that clear when i quoted your simple reply to the subject and said "bingo", indicating complete agreement. You possibly missed that, i can go back and quote that for you too if you'd like.

So...then you have no opinion on the topic and are just trolling. Noted. You done good.

 

[RoyTheHammer]

So...then you have no opinion on the topic and are just trolling. Noted. You done good.

Would you like me to take your reply and word it differently? Would that make my opinion "real" then, since no one is allowed to agree on anything?

More importantly, are you going to continue to reply in butthurt fashion to everything i post when we already agree on the actual subject matter?

 

[carphalen5150]

Would you like me to take your reply and word it differently? Would that make my opinion "real" then, since no one is allowed to agree on anything?

More importantly, are you going to continue to reply in butthurt fashion to everything i post when we already agree on the actual subject matter?

So you agree on the subject matter...cool. That's really all that you need to say.

 

[superpunk]

From my first three responses in the thread:

The fact is the weakside end and the weakside OLB get similar matchups in their careers. They are always going to be singled up on the tackle or hit/chipped by the back/TE.

Not at all. But in any defense, whether it is 43 or 34 your best pass rusher is going to play the weakside rush end spot. The matchups they are going to get are going to almost always be the same.

There isn't a 4-3 end in the league who lines up "head up" on a tackle any percent of the time, much less 75%. They're outside the tackle, with a DT inside of them either playing 3 or 5 technique. The ONLY difference for Ware would be having his hand on the ground, not dropping in coverage as much, and maybe lining up a few feet closer to the tackle than he does now. In terms of additional contact, there is almost no change.

The whole time we were contrasting the matchups and responsibilities of a 4-3 DE with a 3-4 OLB. I did miss it when bigboi switched to talking about who would block the 3-4 DE (thought we were still talking about the 4-3 DE) which led to some confusion which I clarified later in the thread. Aside from the part where I didn't read bigboi's question carefully enough I thought it was a decent enough conversation.

At least until

:roythehammer

decided to shit up the forum.

 

[RoyTheHammer]

So you agree with me on the subject matter...cool. That's really all that you need to say.

Its also what i did say about 20 posts ago in this thread.. ya know, before you got all butthurt and wanted to exchance a few jabs.

 

[Theebs]

Would you like me to take your reply and word it differently? Would that make my opinion "real" then, since no one is allowed to agree on anything?

More importantly, are you going to continue to reply in butthurt fashion to everything i post when we already agree on the actual subject matter?

:roythehammer

 

[RoyTheHammer]

The whole time we were contrasting the matchups and responsibilities of a 4-3 DE with a 3-4 OLB. I did miss it when bigboi switched to talking about who would block the 3-4 DE (thought we were still talking about the 4-3 DE) which led to some confusion which I clarified later in the thread. Aside from the part where I didn't read bigboi's question carefully enough I thought it was a decent enough conversation.

Its a conversation that only made things more confusing than they needed to be.

43.. DE is blocked by the OT.

34.. OLB is blocked by the OT.

Didn't need to write a mini novel about it.

 

[RoyTheHammer]

:roythehammer

Oh, noooo.. the inmates are ganging up on me. Whatever will i dooo??

lol

(PS.. this from another poster who confused the 34 with the 43 in this thread.)

 

[Theebs]

Oh, noooo.. the inmates are ganging up on me. Whatever will i dooo??

lol

(PS.. this from another poster who confused the 34 with the 43 in this thread.)

umm what? When did I confuse the 43 and 34....? I think its u that is confused..

 

[superpunk]

Its a conversation that only made things more confusing than they needed to be.

43.. DE is blocked by the OT.

34.. OLB is blocked by the OT.

Didn't need to write a mini novel about it.

Oh, you mean like right here?

http://www.dallascowboysuniverse.co...-Gosselin-Chat&p=121891&viewfull=1#post121891

 

[RoyTheHammer]

Oh, you mean like right here?

http://www.dallascowboysuniverse.co...-Gosselin-Chat&p=121891&viewfull=1#post121891

Exactly. Like when you said this:

The fact is the weakside end and the weakside OLB get similar matchups in their careers. They are always going to be singled up on the tackle or hit/chipped by the back/TE. It's not like this suddenly happens more if you put your hand on the ground.

That was spot on. Not sure why the other 3 pages of discussion were needed.

 

[superpunk]

The first few were needed because bigboi disagreed with me.

The next few were needed because you're an imbecile.

 

[RoyTheHammer]

The first few were needed because bigboi disagreed with me.

The next few were needed because you're an imbecile.

K bud. How many different ways can you say 34/43 OLB/DE face the OT?

You act like i interrupted some highly intelligent football discussion.. i did the board a favor.

 

[Theebs]

I am still waiting for you to tell me how i confused the 3-4 and 4-3.

Should be fun to hear your explanation for that.

 

[RoyTheHammer]

I am still waiting for you to tell me how i confused the 3-4 and 4-3.

Should be fun to hear your explanation for that.

Early in the thread you said we won't ever switch to a 34 with Ware on the roster.

 

[Theebs]

Early in the thread you said we won't ever switch to a 34 with Ware on the roster.

what?

ummm I said we wont switch to a 34 with ware on the roster.... and explained why i thought that..
It was clearly a typo tardo. Read what I wrote and it makes sense.

this is your idea of confusing the defenses? Good lord.

 

[superpunk]

K bud. How many different ways can you say 34/43 OLB/DE face the OT?

You act like i interrupted some highly intelligent football discussion.. i did the board a favor.

I know more about football than you will ever forget to remember.

 

[jiggyfly]

Read back...he said they are blocked by the guards. He's right...the other guy is wrong.

The DE is not blocked by guards.

Who blocks the LB?