The never-ending POTUS Election thread....

[yimyammer]

 

[touchdown]

Now Pelosi is calling for Cognitive and other tests to be submitted to by Biden. I guess Pelosi is MAGA now?? President Trump has been calling for a Cognitive Test for a long time...

The Knives Are Out For Biden: Democrats Are Looking For A Replacement, But Is It Too Late?

Charlie Kirk

 

[touchdown]

 

[daboyz]

The Knives Are Out For Biden: Democrats Are Looking For A Replacement, But Is It Too Late?​

​

 

[dbair1967]

 

[dbair1967]

Dems about to roll this stupid whore out there as Potato Head's replacement.

Couldnt get a job without spreading her legs or opening her mouth wide, got zero zupport when she ran for Pres and dropped out immediately, then was classic DEI VP pick. Now rumors are her and other race baiters complained internally that she HAS to be the replacement for Biden, or else.

This is what Trump will be debating, should be every bit as laughable as Trump v Biden

 

[dbair1967]

 

[dbair1967]

 

[dbair1967]

This is who they really want to replace Biden.

The ultimate slimeball piece of shit and Scot's hero.

 

[dbair1967]

Slimeball and Cock Gobbler 2024:

 

[dbair1967]

Yeah baby

 

[dbair1967]

 

[dbair1967]

 

[dbair1967]

81 million votes

 

[dbair1967]

 

[dbair1967]

dont worry people, Joe has a plan

 

[cml750]

 

[dbair1967]

comedy gold

 

[Creeper]

The House Judiciary Committee on Monday sued Attorney General Merrick Garland in order to obtain the audio tapes of special counsel Robert Hur's interview of President Joe Biden related to his handling of classified documents after exiting the vice presidency.

The civil action lawsuit filed Monday in federal court in Washington requests, among other things, an injunction to order Garland "to produce the audio recordings of the Special Counsel's interviews with President Biden and Mark Zwonitzer," the president's book ghostwriter, to the Republican-lead House Judiciary Committee chaired by Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio.

House Republicans sue attorney general in federal court over Biden audiotapes - UPI.com

House Republicans sued the attorney general in federal court to obtain the much-desired audio tapes of special counsel Robert Hur's interview of President Joe Biden related to his handling of classified documents.

www.upi.com

For those old enough to remember, Nixon refused to provide his tapes to the Special prosecutor too, and he was sued. The Supreme Court ruled, even though he turned over transcripts of the tapes, he had to turn over the tapes as well. Another Democrats tactic comes back to haunt them.

 

[Creeper]

Of course Democrats are distorting the ruling. The ruling says the president, and only the president, has immunity from prosecution for official acts. It leaves the decision on what is an official act to the courts, but bars them from considering motive when it looks at the acts. It also says the courts have to follow due process to determine if the president's act was an official act of the executive branch or something else. Remember, Judge Tanya Chutkan made an arbitrary decision against Trump claiming he was not immune because his acts were not in his official capacity. But she held no hears, gathered no evidence not did she accept arguments from both sides. The SCOTUS did not say Trump is immune, it only said she needs to determine if he is immune by first determining if he is acts could be his executive responsibility. Now Judge Chutkan will have to hold hearings where both sides will present arguments. It's called due process.

The fact is we all know the president has certain powers no one else has. The power to pardon, for example. He has executive privilege. He can classify or declassify any information for any reason. Immunity is nothing new and it has been exercised by the government in the past. Clinton lying under oath for example. Obama droning American citizens. Nixon bombing Hanoi. There are probably tons of other examples. In the past, both parties exercised restraint and deference when it came to p residents. Blame the Democrats for using lawfare to attack Trump. That is what brought this ruling about.

And by the way, those Democrats calling for Biden to kill Trump should ask themselves this question. Even before this ruling, if Biden had used Seal Team 6 to kill Trump would his DOJ even try to prosecute him? Of course they wouldn't. But if they did, they would have to go to court and prove Biden was not acting in an official capacity when he ordered the murder.

I have to correct myself, the immunity extends to the president's cabinet as well apparent. But immunity only covers what are considered constitutional acts. So all this hand-wringing about Trump assassinating his opponents and getting away with it is nonsense. The disturbing part of it is it was Justice Sotomayor who brought this ridiculous theory up in her dissent. She is a loony as Biden apparently.