- Messages
- 2,310
- Reaction score
- 0
I'm nearly flawless in player evaluations. .
More gold!
lol lol lol lol lol lol
I'm nearly flawless in player evaluations. .
I'm nearly flawless in player evaluations.
Jackson isn't even the best WR on his own team.. let alone in the entire division.
You're a joke on this board. A sad one. Taking the best punter over the best CB is pricelsss. Most people used to think your spew your crap just to stir the pot, but now we know differently, there is soemthing totally wrong with you, especilally when you think that Kinnison is someone to try and emulate, because it really sucks being you.
I'm sick and tired of DeSean Jackson, f' that homo.
So...interviewed with any teams? Seems someone who is flawless would have em lined up to give you a scouting gig...
I can't stand him. But I acknowledge his ability.
He'd walk into Dallas as the most feared offensive player on the team. By a country mile.
His ability? He's a very good player, but he's made of glass.
If he were stronger physically, then I would go as far to say he's the best offensive player in the game.
There are others in this league who I would consider the best over DeSean Jackson.
I never called him the best WR in the game. Just the best in this division. And he is that. He's been that over the last two seasons.
Now his upside isn't the best. Nicks and Bryant have bigger upsides than Jackson. So down the road, it may change. Right now, it hasn't. Jackson is the best in the division. And the NFL writers agree with me. He was the only NFC East WR to appear on their top 10 overall WRs list.
For a guy "made of glass" he seems at least as durable, actually more so, than that iron man Dez Bryant.
My bad I thought you had said best in the NFL.
As far as best in the division I think Nicks is very close to DeSean, Nicks only had 4 yards less than Jackson, and Nicks had more tds.
I guess it would be safe to say Jackson is the better deep threat, but overall Nicks edges him out I think. It's very close between them two though.
And if Dez gets his shit together he could be mentioned in the conversation as well.
If there's something wrong with me it certainly isn't evaluating football talent. I'm peerless.
If we're going tandems, I'd have them....
1. Jackson/Maclin
2. Austin/Bryant
3. Nicks/Smith or Manningham.
The Giants have a tremendous group of receivers but they haven't yet settled on a true #2. I don't know if it's Smith or if Manningham is now that guy.
Washington doesn't deserve a mention. Hankerson helps. A lot. But they don't have near the talent at WR as the other teams do.
If you polled every Eagle, I doubt Maclin would get a single vote.
Moron. Party of one.
Actually.. if you had any idea how the Eagles players felt about Jackson last season, you'd realize why you're statement is again.. idiotic.
Compare their seasons last year.. or hell, compare their sophomore seasons in the NFL. Maclin is clearly a better overall WR, and Vick looked his way alot more last year.