sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
You're a joke on this board. A sad one. Taking the best punter over the best CB is pricelsss. Most people used to think your spew your crap just to stir the pot, but now we know differently, there is soemthing totally wrong with you, especilally when you think that Kinnison is someone to try and emulate, because it really sucks being you.

If there's something wrong with me it certainly isn't evaluating football talent. I'm peerless. I refuse to play stupid to fit in as one of the guys around here.

"especilally when you think that Kinnison is someone to try and emulate"

I mean, that's what I'm working with here.
 

sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
I'm sick and tired of DeSean Jackson, f' that homo.

I can't stand him. But I acknowledge his ability.

He'd walk into Dallas as the most feared offensive player on the team. By a country mile.
 

sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
So...interviewed with any teams? Seems someone who is flawless would have em lined up to give you a scouting gig...

I should.

I damn sure know I'd do a better job of scouting as your dumbass does of stand up, Gallagher.

Might I suggest smashing a watermelon?
 
C

Cr122

Guest
I can't stand him. But I acknowledge his ability.

He'd walk into Dallas as the most feared offensive player on the team. By a country mile.

His ability? He's a very good player, but he's made of glass.

If he were stronger physically, then I would go as far to say he's the best offensive player in the game.

There are others in this league who I would consider the best over DeSean Jackson.
 

sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
His ability? He's a very good player, but he's made of glass.

If he were stronger physically, then I would go as far to say he's the best offensive player in the game.

There are others in this league who I would consider the best over DeSean Jackson.

I never called him the best WR in the game. Just the best in this division. And he is that. He's been that over the last two seasons.

Now his upside isn't the best. Nicks and Bryant have bigger upsides than Jackson. So down the road, it may change. Right now, it hasn't. Jackson is the best in the division. And the NFL writers agree with me. He was the only NFC East WR to appear on their top 10 overall WRs list.

For a guy "made of glass" he seems at least as durable, actually more so, than that iron man Dez Bryant.
 
C

Cr122

Guest
I never called him the best WR in the game. Just the best in this division. And he is that. He's been that over the last two seasons.

Now his upside isn't the best. Nicks and Bryant have bigger upsides than Jackson. So down the road, it may change. Right now, it hasn't. Jackson is the best in the division. And the NFL writers agree with me. He was the only NFC East WR to appear on their top 10 overall WRs list.

For a guy "made of glass" he seems at least as durable, actually more so, than that iron man Dez Bryant.

My bad I thought you had said best in the NFL.

As far as best in the division I think Nicks is very close to DeSean, Nicks only had 4 yards less than Jackson, and Nicks had more tds.

I guess it would be safe to say Jackson is the better deep threat, but overall Nicks edges him out I think. It's very close between them two though.

And if Dez gets his shit together he could be mentioned in the conversation as well.
 
Messages
5,432
Reaction score
0
I wonder how the results would look if you polled the NFC East players/coaches about " who would you rather have " ........
 

sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
My bad I thought you had said best in the NFL.

As far as best in the division I think Nicks is very close to DeSean, Nicks only had 4 yards less than Jackson, and Nicks had more tds.

I guess it would be safe to say Jackson is the better deep threat, but overall Nicks edges him out I think. It's very close between them two though.

And if Dez gets his shit together he could be mentioned in the conversation as well.

I think Nicks might pass him this year as a WR. But Jackson offers the same dynamic impact on special teams too. That might always make me prefer Jackson. But I'm a Nicks mark. He's a beast.

Dez has the versatility to surpass Jackson. He can be a better WR with his size and hands and be the same great returner Jackson is. The only problem with Dez is he's retarded. So you can't really count on him reaching his potential.

I've said before the NFC East has the best WRs. I'd take those three guys and you can have your pick of any other three in the league. I'd like my chances.
 
C

Cr122

Guest
This is the way I rank them as of right now.

1) Hakeem Nicks/ Steve Smith
2) DeSean Jackson/ Jeremy Maclin
3) Dez Bryant/ Miles Austin
4) Anthony Armstrong/ Santana Moss
 
Messages
46,859
Reaction score
5
If there's something wrong with me it certainly isn't evaluating football talent. I'm peerless.

You basically are just waving the white flag on being taken seriously anymore, eh?

I mean, for ****s sake, you're a complete joke anymore.
 

sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
If we're going tandems, I'd have them....

1. Jackson/Maclin
2. Austin/Bryant
3. Nicks/Smith or Manningham.

The Giants have a tremendous group of receivers but they haven't yet settled on a true #2. I don't know if it's Smith or if Manningham is now that guy.

Washington doesn't deserve a mention. Hankerson helps. A lot. But they don't have near the talent at WR as the other teams do.
 
C

Cr122

Guest
I suppose Manningham has the edge over Smith.

He at least had more yards than Smith. Wasn't Smith injured some last year?
 

sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
Yeah Smith was injured. Manningham filled in and did well.

IMO, ideally they would want Manningham starting and Smith working the slot.
 

Plymkr

2
Messages
2,126
Reaction score
0
If we're going tandems, I'd have them....

1. Jackson/Maclin
2. Austin/Bryant
3. Nicks/Smith or Manningham.

The Giants have a tremendous group of receivers but they haven't yet settled on a true #2. I don't know if it's Smith or if Manningham is now that guy.

Washington doesn't deserve a mention. Hankerson helps. A lot. But they don't have near the talent at WR as the other teams do.

Congrats. You finally state something that makes you look like you have a clue.

Keep adding it up there son. You will get there oneday. I think.

Smith is the better slot WR than Manningham. And, yes, Smith was injured last year some.
 
Messages
2,310
Reaction score
0
If you polled every Eagle, I doubt Maclin would get a single vote.

Moron. Party of one.

Actually.. if you had any idea how the Eagles players felt about Jackson last season, you'd realize why you're statement is again.. idiotic.

Compare their seasons last year.. or hell, compare their sophomore seasons in the NFL. Maclin is clearly a better overall WR, and Vick looked his way alot more last year.
 

sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
Actually.. if you had any idea how the Eagles players felt about Jackson last season, you'd realize why you're statement is again.. idiotic.

Compare their seasons last year.. or hell, compare their sophomore seasons in the NFL. Maclin is clearly a better overall WR, and Vick looked his way alot more last year.

I'm very aware of the Eagles situation. Jackson is their lead dog. Their offense revolves around his great talent. Maclin is the compliment.

Not a single player or coach would say Maclin is their best WR.
 

sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
I'll say this for Maclin though - He's better than Miles Austin.

But the great DeSean Jackson? Never.
 
Top Bottom