LOL@The Redskins

[RoyTheHammer]

Yeah, I know.....Jackson is one dimensional.

In the meantime all he does is make plays and impact his team like no other in the division. Including Maclin.

Maclin made more plays last year..

D Jag is a very good deep threat.. a Mike Wallace. Not a complete receiver though.

Hell, even Mike Wallace put up better numbers than D Jag last season.

 

[Rock Slamdance]

lol You get paid to do it.

Yeah, you're making a mint in that career.

I don't "talk shit". I give my opinions. It's just that I'm talking to mindless homer Cowboy fans who can't handle those opinions. If this was an NFL forum, 90% of the people would agree that Jackson is the lead dog of the NFC East and suddenly I wouldn't be a shit talker anymore.

Enough to get out on the road and tell some jokes, drink some beers, and have a good time. How much do you get paid to post on a message board 50 times a day?

And bud, you do talk shit. Every other word out of your mouth is ******, window licker, or homer. Between that and the superiority complex, its no wonder you rub people the wrong way.

That said, the vast majority of the time I agree with you, and I recall we had a good convo about Kinnison once, but I don't sit around waiting for you to state your "fact" about every subject.

 

[sbk92]

Maclin made more plays last year..

D Jag is a very good deep threat.. a Mike Wallace. Not a complete receiver though.

Hell, even Mike Wallace put up better numbers than D Jag last season.

Then you need to inform the NFL writers about this new lead WR in Philly. They seem to disagree with you on their top 10 overall WR list for the league. You get Jackson and not a single other NFC East receiver.

Jackson isn't a very good deep threat. He's the best home run hitting offensive player in football. An all timer in that regard. We have nobody even near his league in making big plays.

 

[RoyTheHammer]

Then you need to inform the NFL writers about this new lead WR in Philly. They seem to disagree with you on their top 10 overall WR list for the league. You get Jackson and not a single other NFC East receiver.

Jackson isn't a very good deep threat. He's the best home run hitting offensive player in football. An all timer in that regard. We have nobody even near his league in making big plays.

NFL writers say alot of dumb or incorrect things all the time. They arn't writing scripture from their place in the heavens..


BTW.. Julius Jones was a "homerun hitter" as well. Fact is, if i could choose one WR to have for their entire career, i'd take Maclin all day.

Stats don't lie.. i can back up the "fact" that Maclin made more plays last year, and D Jag was the deep threat.

 

[sbk92]

Enough to get out on the road and tell some jokes, drink some beers, and have a good time. How much do you get paid to post on a message board 50 times a day?

And bud, you do talk shit. Every other word out of your mouth is ******, window licker, or homer. Between that and the superiority complex, its no wonder you rub people the wrong way.

That said, the vast majority of the time I agree with you, and I recall we had a good convo about Kinnison once, but I don't sit around waiting for you to state your "fact" about every subject.

You have fun talking about "Kinnison" Gallagher. Maybe you can get to together with Lazarus Logan and have at it.

I'm not here to be your buddy. Your pal. Your friend. I'm here to talk football. And it's usually to fans that don't really want to talk honestly about their team and their rivals. That's why I'm right more than the others. I can be honest. It prevents me from ever backing the Quincy Carters, Troy Hambricks, Chad Hutchinsons, Dave Campos, Wade Phillipses, Jerry Jones the GMs just to feel like a real Cowboys fan.

I'm a "shit talker" here and other Cowboys boards. I'm a pretty fair Dallas Cowboys fan everywhere else.

 

[sbk92]

NFL writers say alot of dumb or incorrect things all the time. They arn't writing scripture from their place in the heavens..

Ah, yes. They say dumb things. The guys who cover the league.

If you want the real deal, you have to seek out this RoyDaHammer dipshat over at the DCU. Telling me about the talent of my hometown team, as if I don't know it already.

BTW.. Julius Jones was a "homerun hitter" as well.

lol

Yeah....so. Wait, you were serious? You just compared Julius Jones to DeSean Jackson?

 

[Midswat]

I'm a "shit talker" here and other Cowboys boards.

That's probably because you carry on with the name calling and internet tough guy routine here and other Cowboys boards. On the internet, you can pretend to be somebody.

 

[RoyTheHammer]

That's probably because you carry on with the name calling and internet tough guy routine here and other Cowboys boards. On the internet, you can pretend to be somebody.

lol

 

[RoyTheHammer]

Ah, yes. They say dumb things. The guys who cover the league.

If you want the real deal, you have to seek out this RoyDaHammer dipshat over at the DCU. Telling me about the talent of my hometown team, as if I don't know it already.




lol

Yeah....so. Wait, you were serious? You just compared Julius Jones to DeSean Jackson?

You must not read alot of sports articles or blogs or reports if you haven't seen many many dumb statements by sports writers.

Also, since you apparently missed it, im devaluing the importance of the term "homerun hitter" since that's all i ever heard about Julius Jones when he was here.

Bottom line.. is you make plays if you make plays. I don't care if you "hit a homerun" every now and then. Give me the guy that produces consistently game in and game out everytime, and i'll beat your team of "homerun hitters" 99 times out of 100.

 

[Rock Slamdance]

You have fun talking about "Kinnison" Gallagher. Maybe you can get to together with Lazarus Logan and have at it.

OMG! You called me Gallagher, nice call back to earlier in the thread when you did the same thing! Ha ha. Ha. Yawn.

I'm not here to be your buddy. Your pal. Your friend. I'm here to talk football. And it's usually to fans that don't really want to talk honestly about their team and their rivals. That's why I'm right more than the others. I can be honest. It prevents me from ever backing the Quincy Carters, Troy Hambricks, Chad Hutchinsons, Dave Campos, Wade Phillipses, Jerry Jones the GMs just to feel like a real Cowboys fan.

I'm a "shit talker" here and other Cowboys boards. I'm a pretty fair Dallas Cowboys fan everywhere else.

I don't want you to be my friend, so we're cool on that. What you call honesty most people call acting like a spoiled cocksucker. Most of the time, it can be amusing, watching you and other posters argue for pages and pages, thread after thread, posting the exact same nonsense. And since I don't like or dislike you as a poster, more "nothing" you, it, I don't really worry about it.

But when you start touting your "flawless player evaluations", now we have hit ridiculous territory. It tells me one of two things...you are either full of it, or you spend so much time "evaluating players" and posting on message boards, you have no life.

 

[sbk92]

You must not read alot of sports articles or blogs or reports if you haven't seen many many dumb statements by sports writers.

Also, since you apparently missed it, im devaluing the importance of the term "homerun hitter" since that's all i ever heard about Julius Jones when he was here.

Bottom line.. is you make plays if you make plays. I don't care if you "hit a homerun" every now and then. Give me the guy that produces consistently game in and game out everytime, and i'll beat your team of "homerun hitters" 99 times out of 100.

I've seen many dumb comments from sports writers. Or what I perceive to be dumb comments.

Times that by 10, and that's how many dumb posts I've read from fans.

I'll weigh it out, but I'm pretty sure I'm gonna lean toward the NFL writers on this one over RoyDaHammer.

 

[RoyTheHammer]

I've seen many dumb comments from sports writers. Or what I perceive to be dumb comments.

Times that by 10, and that's how many dumb posts I've read from fans.

I'll weigh it out, but I'm pretty sure I'm gonna lean toward the NFL writers on this one over RoyDaHammer.

Lean towards whomever you'd like bud. Im going to stick with my bottom line from my last post.

 

[sbk92]

But when you start touting your "flawless player evaluations", now we have hit ridiculous territory. It tells me one of two things...you are either full of it, or you spend so much time "evaluating players" and posting on message boards, you have no life.

Nearly flawless. Get it right.

Not that I can tell you what each and every player will do in the NFL. But when I feel strongly one way or the other you can pretty much take it to the bank.

And while you're there, cash that ginormous stand up check too.

 

[sbk92]

Lean towards whomever you'd like bud. Im going to stick with my bottom line from my last post.

Jackson's been consistent. Since he's been in the league, he's been one of the most feared offensive players in the game. His career's too young to point to many years of production. He's still a pup. But he's definitely been the top WR in this division the last two seasons.

When Dez Bryant surpasses him, I'll let you know.

 

[Rock Slamdance]

Nearly flawless. Get it right.

Not that I can tell you what each and every player will do in the NFL. But when I feel strongly one way or the other you can pretty much take it to the bank.

And while you're there, cash that ginormous stand up check too.

Yawn.

 

[Plymkr]

Right.

Because there are no retards on that team. Jackson is head and shoulders, make that a country f'n mile, their best WR.

Mike Vick says thank you for establishing that.


You're a ****ing moron.

 

[RoyTheHammer]

Jackson's been consistent. Since he's been in the league, he's been one of the most feared offensive players in the game. His career's too young to point to many years of production. He's still a pup. But he's definitely been the top WR in this division the last two seasons.

Maclin was a better WR last year.

Jackson ony had 6 games last season over 50 yards receiving.. and 9 games with 3 catches or less.

Is that what passes for "consistent" in your book? Because it sounds alot like "deep threat" in mine.

 

[sbk92]

Mike Vick says thank you for establishing that.


You're a ****ing moron.

Mike Vick isn't retarded. He's a scumbag.

Look up the word ****** and get back to me.

 

[sbk92]

Maclin was a better WR last year.

Jackson ony had 6 games last season over 50 yards receiving.. and 9 games with 3 catches or less.

Is that what passes for "consistent" in your book? Because it sounds alot like "deep threat" in mine.

He's certainly a deep threat. Which isn't a negative. It's what makes him so good. His ability to score anywhere on the field like no other in the league.

He's played three years. He's averaging over 1,000 yards, about 20 yards a reception, he's got more 50 yards or longer TDs before the age of 25 than any player to ever play in the league. The guy is a phenominal talent. To try to dismiss him just makes you lose all credibility. That's just a fan who can't tip his hat to a rival's greatness.

 

[RoyTheHammer]

He's certainly a deep threat. Which isn't a negative. It's what makes him so good. His ability to score anywhere on the field like no other in the league.

He's played three years. He's averaging over 1,000 yards, about 20 yards a reception, he's got more 50 yards or longer TDs before the age of 25 than any player to ever play in the league. The guy is a phenominal talent. To try to dismiss him just makes you lose all credibility. That's just a fan who can't tip his hat to a rival's greatness.

Being a deep threat is certainly not a negative. No one has tried to say it is. No one has tried to dismiss him as having no talent either. But when you talk about complete WR's and the best ones in the division.. he is not the best.

As i've already stated and shown, he was not even as consistent nor did he make as many plays as his counterpart last season.