https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/new-jersey-takes-steps-to-mandate-sales-of-smart-guns
I have mixed feelings about this technology. I don't think the technology is fool proof yet, and if we had one incident where a person was unable to fire his gun in self-defense and wound up dead, smart guns would become a dead issue.
But what if the tech is perfected? The argument is it makes guns more expensive. Okay. Probably. But still. what if?
First, it strengthens the argument for gun ownership. The argument that gun owners are killed with their own guns goes away. The child safety issue goes away. The locking up your guns requirement becomes unnecessary. I can see some positives in this technology for gun owners - if the technology works.
And what about cops? Maybe they should have the smart guns too.
Of course the smart gun concept only addresses specific problems, accidental shootings and stolen guns. I am skeptical that smart guns can be made tamper proof but maybe I am wrong. They still do not address the problem of bad guys with guns.
Then there is the argument that guns could be rendered useless remotely somehow. Not sure how and this seems like a small problem to have to address. The electronics could be isolated from radio and other waves to prevent any remote signals from effecting it. Shield the technology should be easy.
I would oppose making it mandatory, but I don't automatically oppose it either. My guns are currently in a safe with a fingerprint deactivated lock. I have to admit it is not perfect. There are times when I need the reader to see my finger multiple times before it opens. But I think this problem can be overcome.