and will still be doing it the day we re-elect Obama.
let me know if you need me to define any more words for you reading is tough
and will still be doing it the day we re-elect Obama.
let me know if you need me to define any more words for you reading is tough
Bob Sacamano
All-Pro
- Messages
- 26,436
- Reaction score
- 3
I thought Bain Capitol or whatever just took money from businesses who sought their guidance?
- Messages
- 2,064
- Reaction score
- 0
Obama’s New Firewall: Ohio, Iowa, New Hampshire, and Nevada
By Jim Geraghty
October 17, 2012
Major Garrett, writing in National Journal:
What also became clear after the dust began to settle from the rumble on Long Island was the electoral map has narrowed and Obama’s team, while conceding nothing publicly, is circling the wagons around Ohio, Iowa, New Hampshire, and Nevada. Plouffe said that Obama remains strong in all four states, but he would not discuss the specifics of internal polling or voter-contact analytics, saying only that Obama has “significant leads” in all four places.
It is uncharacteristic of Team Obama to concede any terrain, but Plouffe offered no such assurances about Obama’s position in North Carolina, Virginia, or Florida. Romney advisers have seen big gains in all three states and now consider wins likely, although not guaranteed, in all three. They are similarly upbeat about prospects in Colorado but not confident enough to predict victory. That Plouffe left Colorado off his list of states where Obama’s leading and can withstand a Romney surge might be telling.
Chalk one up for Suffolk University Political Research Center’s David Paleologos, which said they would stop polling North Carolina, Virginia, and Florida last week.
Fascinatingly, the description of Plouffe’s comments puts New Hampshire in the “firewall” pile, when the last three polls have Romney up by 4 (ARG) a tie (Suffolk) and Obama ahead by 1 (Rasmussen).
By Jim Geraghty
October 17, 2012
Major Garrett, writing in National Journal:
What also became clear after the dust began to settle from the rumble on Long Island was the electoral map has narrowed and Obama’s team, while conceding nothing publicly, is circling the wagons around Ohio, Iowa, New Hampshire, and Nevada. Plouffe said that Obama remains strong in all four states, but he would not discuss the specifics of internal polling or voter-contact analytics, saying only that Obama has “significant leads” in all four places.
It is uncharacteristic of Team Obama to concede any terrain, but Plouffe offered no such assurances about Obama’s position in North Carolina, Virginia, or Florida. Romney advisers have seen big gains in all three states and now consider wins likely, although not guaranteed, in all three. They are similarly upbeat about prospects in Colorado but not confident enough to predict victory. That Plouffe left Colorado off his list of states where Obama’s leading and can withstand a Romney surge might be telling.
Chalk one up for Suffolk University Political Research Center’s David Paleologos, which said they would stop polling North Carolina, Virginia, and Florida last week.
Fascinatingly, the description of Plouffe’s comments puts New Hampshire in the “firewall” pile, when the last three polls have Romney up by 4 (ARG) a tie (Suffolk) and Obama ahead by 1 (Rasmussen).
Sheik
All-Pro
- Messages
- 24,809
- Reaction score
- 5
So Obama apparently went to the guy that asked the Libya question last night, after the debate, and totally contradicted and proved Himself a liar.
paraphrasing:
the reason I didn't call it an act of terror the next day, was because I didn't want to put out false information.
Yet, he and his "team", had no issue with doing just that for weeks after the attack.
hmmmm. . .
paraphrasing:
the reason I didn't call it an act of terror the next day, was because I didn't want to put out false information.
Yet, he and his "team", had no issue with doing just that for weeks after the attack.
hmmmm. . .
- Messages
- 2,064
- Reaction score
- 0
Cool story, bro
Hoofbite
Draft Pick
- Messages
- 4,231
- Reaction score
- 0
What was the question?
- Messages
- 2,064
- Reaction score
- 0
And because they didn't want to take a political hit for not being prepared for an attack on 9-11.
Good thing though is that the next debate is on...foreign policy. And unfortunately for Obama, Ms Candy won't be there to hold his hand and bail him out again.
Bob Sacamano
All-Pro
- Messages
- 26,436
- Reaction score
- 3
Just proving how dorky arguing over politics is.
- Messages
- 10,636
- Reaction score
- 0
Some chick asked how they'd address women making 72 cents for every dollar a man makes .
Romneys answer was that he hired a chick once and let her go home early to make dinner
- Messages
- 2,064
- Reaction score
- 0
SuperPunk proved that weeks ago. You're late to the party.
- Messages
- 2,064
- Reaction score
- 0
Obama gave an eloquent answer but failed to mention he pays women in his administration thousands less than their male counterparts.
- Messages
- 10,636
- Reaction score
- 0
Still better than Obamas previous tactic of crying about time like a snitch
Bob Sacamano
All-Pro
- Messages
- 26,436
- Reaction score
- 3
lol superPUNK what a dork.