And to muddy the waters a bit more ... there is "smart" and "football smart."
In light of his repeated difficulty with game management decisions/strategy, in no way has Garrett demonstrated a high level of "football smarts."
it's of no solace to me that Red was better than Troy at algebra and biology 30 years ago, because none of it has translated to winning football games.
1) That's dumb.I pretty much ignore anything anyone says about a QB if they first talk about arm strength or size. What is really important about a QB FIRST is what is between the ears. EVERYTHING ELSE is second at best.
1) That's dumb.
2) We're not privvy to what is between the ears of any particular QB prospect. All we can talk about is what we see when he throws the ball.
3) Scouts ALWAYS identify a player's physical skills before they start finding out what's between the ears. When you try to find QB talent, you don't go into the classroom and start interviewing guys. You go to the football field first, you identify who has talent, and THEN you go talk to them. Any other way is a waste of time.
Your way would be like looking for a house by scouring the internet only for pictures of what's inside the walls and under the floor. No one does that. They look at the specs of the house and pictures of the living areas first, they identify what interests them, and then they dig deeper to see the guts.
Same way he got the job with the Cowboys... His daddy was there.Does anyone know how Garrett got into Princeton?
1) That's dumb.
2) We're not privvy to what is between the ears of any particular QB prospect. All we can talk about is what we see when he throws the ball.
3) Scouts ALWAYS identify a player's physical skills before they start finding out what's between the ears. When you try to find QB talent, you don't go into the classroom and start interviewing guys. You go to the football field first, you identify who has talent, and THEN you go talk to them. Any other way is a waste of time.
Your way would be like looking for a house by scouring the internet only for pictures of what's inside the walls and under the floor. No one does that. They look at the specs of the house and pictures of the living areas first, they identify what interests them, and then they dig deeper to see the guts.
Compared to identifying mental makeup first, you're damn right it's the easy route. I prefer to call it the efficient route though. Instead of analyzing every single piece of straw in the haystack for the needle, I'm identifying which ones are shiny and going from there.ah said the spider to the fly....
welcome to my parlor.....
You just explained why so many QBs are busts in the draft. Because everyone pretty much looks at what is obvious instead of putting most of the effort into trying to figure out what is between the ears.
To be blunt you are just like every other internet expert wannabe and frankly like too many scouts and coaches.
You take the easy route.
Garrett strikes me as book smart. That's why he's an OK process guy. He tries to follow some coaching blue print
That's why he blames everything on execution. No creativity in game planning. No feel for the game.
DING DING DING!If he's book smart then he needs to read Jimmy's book. Maybe he will learn something
The notion that arm strength or physical attributes 'doesn't matter,' or even it's importance being diminished is ridiculous. Kellen Moore is football smart as fuck. You want him as your starter? There's a ton of 'smart' QB's that don't pan out because they lack the required arm strength.
That isn't to say that the head game doesn't matter. Clearly it does - otherwise players like Leaf or George or Russell wouldn't have busted. But you start how peplaw suggests - as every draft scout/nfl front office etc does... find the physical attributes first (as they're the most easily recognized) then parse the players down by their intangibles - to include leadership ability and intelligence.
Compared to identifying mental makeup first, you're damn right it's the easy route. I prefer to call it the efficient route though. Instead of analyzing every single piece of straw in the haystack for the needle, I'm identifying which ones are shiny and going from there.
But if you'll notice, never did I say how much effort scouts should try to put into finding out what a QBs mental makeup is. All I said is that they all look for physical attributes first to identify talent, then try to find out the mental makeup.
And every talent evaluator probably has different things they look for in mental makeup. There is no one way to determine what mental makeup will make a successful QB. There have been some successful QBs who are fiery competitors, there are some who have ice water in their veins. There have been some who are in your face leaders, and some who lead by example alone. Your idea that you go look at the "top 10 QBs and analyze the crap out of them" is so elementary it's embarrassing.
Ironic that you think I'm the one being an internet expert wannabe.
1. Showered with praise after three very good days of practice and a solid showing in the Senior Bowl game, quarterback Carson Wentz was even more impressive in closed-door meetings with coaches and general managers. I’m told he knocked it out of the park during interviews as personnel people around the league who interviewed Wentz were awed by his knowledge of X’s and O’s. The belief is the North Dakota State product, who was a 4.0 student in college, should have no problem running a multiple formation offense on Sundays and coaches love his upside.
2. Though he didn’t attend the Senior Bowl, Christian Hackenberg is another signal-caller whose upside potential excites NFL decision-makers. Some eyebrows were raised when Hackenberg left for the NFL Draft after two dismal seasons, but the situation at Penn State was untenable for him. He offers the physical skills to start on Sunday and teams truly believe with proper coaching he’ll reach his potential in the NFL, something Hackenberg would’ve never achieved on the college level. No one I’ve spoken with in the past two months believes Hackenberg will drop out of the draft’s top 75 picks.
3. Is it possible two quarterbacks will be top five selections in April? The answer from league insiders is “yes” with Carson Wentz and Jared Goff filling the slots. Wentz is watching his draft stock move north after the Senior Bowl and many believe the Combine is the perfect setting for Goff to show off his talents. Assuming he participates in Combine workouts, one insider told me they expect Goff to, “throw the hell out of the ball and be on the mark with all his passes.”
4. Contrary to Wentz and Goff there’s little excitement for Connor Cook. I took flak from Michigan State fans last week after posting teammates were “less than effusive in their praise” of the quarterback, but scouts and insiders I spoke with in Mobile said the situation surrounding Cook’s personality poses a problem for them. The fact he chose not to attend the Senior Bowl further complicates the situation and it’s something Cook will be grilled about during the Combine.
Same way he got the job with the Cowboys... His daddy was there.