iceberg
In the Rotation
- Messages
- 824
- Reaction score
- 0
if you're going to make such damning accusations, i'd have to think you'd investigate both sides equally. otherwise, you're just another agenda pusher.
for example - an interview where osama denied killing women and children:
from osama:
I have already said that I am not involved in the 11 September attacks in the United States. As a Muslim, I try my best to avoid telling a lie. I had no knowledge of these attacks, nor do I consider the killing of innocent women, children, and other humans as an appreciable act. Islam strictly forbids causing harm to innocent women, children, and other people.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/interview-with-osama-bin-laden-denies-his-involvement-in-9-11/24697
this was a "i didn't do it" interview.
this from wiki:
Bin Laden's ideology included the concept that civilians, including women and children, are legitimate targets of jihad.[54][55] Bin Laden was anti-Semitic, and delivered warnings against alleged Jewish conspiracies: "These Jews are masters of usury and leaders in treachery. They will leave you nothing, either in this world or the next."[56] Shia Muslims have been listed along with "heretics, [...] America, and Israel" as the four principal "enemies of Islam" at ideology classes of bin Laden's al-Qaeda organization.[57]
Bin Laden opposed music on religious grounds,[58] and his attitude towards technology was mixed. He was interested in "earth-moving machinery and genetic engineering of plants" on the one hand, but rejected "chilled water" on the other.[59]
so we have him saying he can't tell a lie, yet, he does.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Osama_bin_Laden
he won't attack women and children cause that's just evil (yet he'll strap a bomb on a child to blow up a coffee shop)
so why don't you go back and look at al queda / osama attacks and see where he didn't give a flipshit about children and then tell me with a straight face how his denial based on such a claim has more cred than our government.
maybe both are lying. but god damn son, you let yourself believe some radical shit that can't be proven to justify what again, can't be proven by the same logic.
for example - an interview where osama denied killing women and children:
from osama:
I have already said that I am not involved in the 11 September attacks in the United States. As a Muslim, I try my best to avoid telling a lie. I had no knowledge of these attacks, nor do I consider the killing of innocent women, children, and other humans as an appreciable act. Islam strictly forbids causing harm to innocent women, children, and other people.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/interview-with-osama-bin-laden-denies-his-involvement-in-9-11/24697
this was a "i didn't do it" interview.
this from wiki:
Bin Laden's ideology included the concept that civilians, including women and children, are legitimate targets of jihad.[54][55] Bin Laden was anti-Semitic, and delivered warnings against alleged Jewish conspiracies: "These Jews are masters of usury and leaders in treachery. They will leave you nothing, either in this world or the next."[56] Shia Muslims have been listed along with "heretics, [...] America, and Israel" as the four principal "enemies of Islam" at ideology classes of bin Laden's al-Qaeda organization.[57]
Bin Laden opposed music on religious grounds,[58] and his attitude towards technology was mixed. He was interested in "earth-moving machinery and genetic engineering of plants" on the one hand, but rejected "chilled water" on the other.[59]
so we have him saying he can't tell a lie, yet, he does.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Osama_bin_Laden
he won't attack women and children cause that's just evil (yet he'll strap a bomb on a child to blow up a coffee shop)
so why don't you go back and look at al queda / osama attacks and see where he didn't give a flipshit about children and then tell me with a straight face how his denial based on such a claim has more cred than our government.
maybe both are lying. but god damn son, you let yourself believe some radical shit that can't be proven to justify what again, can't be proven by the same logic.
