- Thread starter Irving Cowboy
- Start date
- Messages
- 10,636
- Reaction score
- 0
Through a kitchen skylight, I can verify
peplaw06
2
- Messages
- 8,660
- Reaction score
- 0
:thumbsup
peplaw06
2
- Messages
- 8,660
- Reaction score
- 0
Nuh uh... You're not going anywhere.
The real answer is you're trying to fit his laugh into your opinion of the events.
- Messages
- 4,604
- Reaction score
- 0
- Messages
- 4,604
- Reaction score
- 0
- Messages
- 6,827
- Reaction score
- 1
GUYS! Hugs, not insults.
- Messages
- 156
- Reaction score
- 4
Tomlin's been on NFL sidelines for years. He knows where he should stand and how players can influence a play by standing close. Remember, this is a head coach actively participating in the game. He's not some distracted trainer.
He "happened" to watch this one play on the Jumbotron
- That gave him an excuse to stand perpendicular to and not face the field, allowing his right foot to be as close to the sideline as possible, even on the field.
- It allowed his back to be facing the majority of the play, again giving him a reason to supposedly not notice the opposing player running right at him.
- It allowed him to react at exactly the right moment to not actively trip the runner despite his back facing him. Had he done this facing the play itself everyone would have known he was trying to screw the runner up.
-He suddenly moves his foot closer to the field then jerks it back.
Watching the jumbotron actually makes sense since it can give you a perspective the sideline can't.
What I can't understand is why he didn't move away earlier or why he sticks his foot on the field so suddenly.
I think at least subconsciously he knew he could get away with edging close and disrupting the play. The timing is too close for it to not have been planned.
He "happened" to watch this one play on the Jumbotron
- That gave him an excuse to stand perpendicular to and not face the field, allowing his right foot to be as close to the sideline as possible, even on the field.
- It allowed his back to be facing the majority of the play, again giving him a reason to supposedly not notice the opposing player running right at him.
- It allowed him to react at exactly the right moment to not actively trip the runner despite his back facing him. Had he done this facing the play itself everyone would have known he was trying to screw the runner up.
-He suddenly moves his foot closer to the field then jerks it back.
Watching the jumbotron actually makes sense since it can give you a perspective the sideline can't.
What I can't understand is why he didn't move away earlier or why he sticks his foot on the field so suddenly.
I think at least subconsciously he knew he could get away with edging close and disrupting the play. The timing is too close for it to not have been planned.
- Messages
- 4,604
- Reaction score
- 0
Did you see it as an opportunity to scare someone on the ground floor by feigning losing your grip on your club just before or during mid-stroke? What don't you get? Are you that thick? The M-Fer loves people like you who will buy his line of bullshit. It's already been pointed out that his statement regarding the incident made no sense at all but you are licking it up like a dog does it's own vomit.
peplaw06
2
- Messages
- 8,660
- Reaction score
- 0
No. It was an accident. You know how accidents happen and all that shit? I did something stupid and was getting razzed by my friends, so I was laughing at myself.
I've found out your problem with analogies. You're presuming intent by his actions and looking at everything else through those lenses. It's like a fucking epidemic with you, NoDak, and all these other closed-minded fucktards. If it's not the EXACT SAME set of circumstances in your opinion, then it's not an analogy.
But an analogy is not an identical set of circumstances. It's a comparison of two things that aren't the same things, but illustrate a similar point. The point of my analogy is to show you how reasonable people can see the same action (laughing) as evidence of an accident, rather than "HAR HAR I GOT THOSE GUIS GOOD!!" But you guys refuse to look at things through other perspectives. You make up your mind and that's it.
More irony.
I haven't heard or read his statement. It has literally zero bearing on how I viewed what happened. But that's not going to stop you from assuming shit you THINK happened.
Bob Sacamano
All-Pro
- Messages
- 26,436
- Reaction score
- 3
I think it's the fact that he does a lot of drive-bys critiquing people as opposed to shooting the breeze or talking football, like zrinkill likes to do.
NoDak doesn't bother me, but I think that's why superpunk started calling him that.
- Messages
- 2,329
- Reaction score
- 11
It's the higher end of the Low Average range. Roughly the same or greater than 20 percent of Jon's same age peers in overall intellectual ability and mental control.
Practical Significance of IQ
74 to 88. 20%ile. 8th-Grade to 12th-Grade education. Vocational ability: Assembler, food service, nurse's aide
- Messages
- 4,604
- Reaction score
- 0
You were saying something about irony?
I know what an analogy is, you moron. Fact is you didn't even come close to one with your scenario. All you did was out yourself as a limp-wristed golfer.
peplaw06
2
- Messages
- 8,660
- Reaction score
- 0
Yes...? Do you know what irony means?
Clearly you don't.
Then explain to me how it's not an analogy... cause you haven't done that.