Punish Law Abiding Citizens and Ignore Criminals. Great Plan. Fucking Idiots.

[iceberg]

Either way you still haven't answered it.

this coming from a punk bitch who claims to know everything.

but won't reply to me.

stop hiding, come on out and swim in the deep end of the pool.

mini-14
ar-15

do you know the difference?

if not, shut the fuck up.

 

[iceberg]

I do really think it. Don't hide behind the constitution. I can explain the benefit of having a 60" tv quite easily. Still waiting for anyone to do the same for assault rifles.

don't hide behind liberalism.

 

[iceberg]

it seems w/superbitch, it's ok to look like how you feel, unless it's a gun.

there is not much of a functional difference between a mini-14 and an ar-15, they just look different. for someone who preaches looks don't matter....

 

[ScipioCowboy]

Either way you still haven't answered it.

Yes, I did.

 

[VTA]

What's the question?

 

[2233boys]

"The historical reality of the Second Amendment’s protection of the right to keep and bear arms is not that it protects the right to shoot deer. It protects the right to shoot tyrants, and it protects the right to shoot at them effectively, with the same instruments they would use upon us." -- Judge Andrew Napolitano

There's your reason. You may disagree with it, but it's the historical basis behind the Second Amendment. It's every bit as much a part of the Constitution as a separation of church and state.

The Tyrant would be the government and the bolded part isn't true because we don't have that access as civilians.

 

[2233boys]

i already pointed out my bitches hypocracy.

it seems since i keep doing that, he just ignores me now.

he doesn't know what the fuck he's talking about and i refuse to join him on his emotional extremes.

seems to piss him off.

however, the mini-14 *is* just a different version of the ar-15. but since it doesn't look like what they see in the movies, they (being the butt-nugget-stupid of the world) pretend a black gun with a pistol grip has more power than than my springfield m1a.

nope.

as for "no one hunts with an ar-15" - watch yukon men and get back to me. although i think they'd have to use the .308 version. .223 wouldn't take down an elk most likely.

I actually think I said you couldn't hunt with one in PA. I saw an episode of Yukon Man when he used an AR-15 for hunting. I thought that was BS. Not a hunter but I used to be. Where is the sport in that.

 

[superpunk]

Yes, I did.

No, you haven't. Noone has.

 

[ScipioCowboy]

The Tyrant would be the government and the bolded part isn't true because we don't have that access as civilians.

Untrue.

Civilians have access to weapons the military uses. They just don't have access to all forms of weapons the military uses. But it's not really needed to be successful.

 

[Jon88]

Heavily regulated? An AR15 isn't regulated any more than any other semi-auto rifle.

Is one of these regulated more than the other? They're both the same caliber, .223. They're both semi-automatic. The top gun can have magazines that hold 5, 10, 20, or 30 rounds. Same as the bottom one. The bottom one has an adjustable stock, a pistol grip, and raised iron sights. None of which affect the firing of the weapon. The rate or velocity of fire. Are they the reason people want to ban this dreaded "assault" rifle and not the top one? And why exactly, is the top one called a hunting rifle and the bottom one an assault rifle when they are basically the same thing?

BTW, the top rifle is just as "capable of mass murder" as the bottom one. So is my Kimber Custom II .45 acp.

I used to have one of those guns with a 40 round clip. I would describe it with two words: Loud and innacurate.

 

[JBond]

"The historical reality of the Second Amendment’s protection of the right to keep and bear arms is not that it protects the right to shoot deer. It protects the right to shoot tyrants, and it protects the right to shoot at them effectively, with the same instruments they would use upon us." -- Judge Andrew Napolitano

There's your reason. You may disagree with it, but it's the historical basis behind the Second Amendment. It's every bit as much a part of the Constitution as a separation of church and state.

That isn't an answer.

Why, because you do not like it? The founders of our country were very clear regarding the intent of the Second Amendment.

"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms. The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government"

 

[iceberg]

I actually think I said you couldn't hunt with one in PA. I saw an episode of Yukon Man when he used an AR-15 for hunting. I thought that was BS. Not a hunter but I used to be. Where is the sport in that.

in what? it's simply a semi-auto rifle. others use bolt action also. i would imagine they simply use what they have. as for "sport" - i doubt they consider it sporting, but survival.

 

[2233boys]

Untrue.

Civilians have access to weapons the military uses. They just don't have access to all forms of weapons the military uses. But it's not really needed to be successful.

So it's not untrue just like I said.

 

[2233boys]

in what? it's simply a semi-auto rifle. others use bolt action also. i would imagine they simply use what they have. as for "sport" - i doubt they consider it sporting, but survival.

Like I said on PA you can't use semi automatic weapons for hunting. Considering I only saw one of them use an Ar-15, stand by what I said.

 

[iceberg]

Like I said on PA you can't use semi automatic weapons for hunting. Considering I only saw one of them use an Ar-15, stand by what I said.

strange. but each state has their own laws. but again, in alaska it's not for sport so i'm sure they'd use whatever they had in order to have enough meat for a long cold winter. ain't no stores to buy stuff in tanana.

 

[JBond]

At least most of us can agree punishing law abiding citizen either through a reduction in rights or monetarily through asinine taxes or other financial measures will not reduce gun violence, so why is the democrat party so hell bent on doing exactly that? What is the true purpose? Can anyone help me with an explanation?

 

[MetalHead]

I used to have one of those guns with a 40 round clip. I would describe it with two words: Loud and innacurate.

Which one?
The AR or the mini 14?

 

[JBond]

Which one?
The AR or the mini 14?

I doubt he even knows the difference between a clip and a magazine. I would love to see him try and feed a 40 round clip through either.

 

[superpunk]

wow you guys are just cunts to everyone.

jon88 you're my boy blue/

 

[MetalHead]

I doubt he even knows the difference between a clip and a magazine. I would love to see him try and feed a 40 round clip through either.

You beat me to it,because that is where I was going.
As for inaccurate,zero the fucking weapon first....he was probably a shitty shot and blames the rifle.