- Messages
- 2,633
- Reaction score
- 0
That's what you're taught.. correct. Seems like its a pretty effective move, right?
lol
:roythehammer
That's what you're taught.. correct. Seems like its a pretty effective move, right?
Here's a guy who just doesn't get it, ever.
If we had a Hall of Fame for threads, this one might make it in there.
Newman is stupid. *thread resuscitated*
Look at the Eagles today.. they played wayy too loose in coverage and their star CB's got thrown on underneath all day long.
Maybe those star CB's arnt as good as some of you thought. None of them can tackle a lick and they've given up a number of big plays in addition to being thrown on underneath. It hasnt all been because they "played too loose in coverage"
Maybe those star CB's arnt as good as some of you thought. None of them can tackle a lick and they've given up a number of big plays in addition to being thrown on underneath. It hasnt all been because they "played too loose in coverage"
I'm amazed that they don't just put their hand between the receivers' hands so they can just pop the ball out. It is so damn obvious that it would prevent the reception. There have only been about a million CBs during the history of the league. You'd think one of them would have figured that out by now.
sup?
If the Party-Ass starts farting Newman-opinions again, I'm going to hold you down like Frank Walker in coverage on a TE and stroll my baby-nuts right into your mouth for this.
If the Party-Ass starts farting Newman-opinions again, I'm going to hold you down like Frank Walker in coverage on a TE and stroll my baby-nuts right into your mouth for this.
I could cover the WR's on NE whos name doesnt rhyme with Schmelker