Irvin appears in gay magazine to push equality

[superpunk]

It's all about equality Laz.

Or something like that.

Ya'll are free to be bigots. Just do it in the privacy of your own homes.

 

[Midswat]

It's about equality. You are free to think they are gross or unnatural, you are not free to deny them rights and services that other citizens avail themselves of simply because you disapprove of what they do.

Yes you can.

 

[superpunk]

Well obviously you "can", because we "do". That doesn't make it right or fair.

 

[NoShame]

So now you trying to equate a sexual deviation/perversion with being black and/or a woman?

Shit is about to get real.

 

[LAZARUS_LOGAN]

Only if you use some bastardized version of the term "natural" that is meant to fit religious preconceptions - which would themselves fall into the category "unnatural" then.

When two homosexuals are able to get together and reproduce NATURALLY... then I guess it can then be referred to as being natural.

 

[Midswat]

Well obviously you "can", because we "do". That doesn't make it right or fair.

Life isn't fair.

Fair isn't a "right."

 

[LAZARUS_LOGAN]

I'm originally from Jersey. And I don't get your joke.

Maybe he's referencing the reality tv show of Jersey Shore.

 

[Cythim]

Well next, pedophiles are going to want to marry their pre-pubescant paramours, and I suppose that also will make the world a better place.


Then people who practice zoophilia/bestiality will want to also marry animals, and that too, will make the world a better place.

This is completely ignorant. There is a difference in protecting the innocent (kids and animals) and protecting your religious views. Comparing gays to pedophiles and zoophiles is comparing Christians to extremist Muslim suicide bombers.

 

[superpunk]

When two homosexuals are able to get together and reproduce NATURALLY... then I guess it can then be referred to as being natural.

Do you really think the only purpose of sex and love is to reproduce? Is this the 1600s? Should barren couples not be allowed to marry since they cannot reproduce "naturally"? Do you actually think before you type this bullshit or are you just on religious-zealot-autopilot?

 

[LAZARUS_LOGAN]

This is completely ignorant. There is a difference in protecting the innocent (kids and animals) and protecting your religious views. Comparing gays to pedophiles and zoophiles is comparing Christians to extremist Muslim suicide bombers.

Not ignorant at all. Homosexuals claim that they are "born this way", why can't a pedophile and/or a zoophile make the same claim and thereby act upon it?

 

[superpunk]

Life isn't fair.

Fair isn't a "right."

Discrimination for all!

 

[LAZARUS_LOGAN]

Do you really think the only purpose of sex and love is to reproduce? Is this the 1600s? Should barren couples not be allowed to marry since they cannot reproduce "naturally"? Do you actually think before you type this bullshit or are you just on religious-zealot-autopilot?

That doesn't make sense. If they are in the 1600's, how would they know that they are barren except until AFTER they were married? Because if the woman became pregnant before marriage, more than likely she would have been exiled or killed, so you are not making any sense.

 

[Cythim]

Not ignorant at all. Homosexuals claim that they are "born this way", why can't a pedophile and/or a zoophile make the same claim and thereby act upon it?

Because homosexuals do it in consenting fashion while pedophiles and zoophiles violate innocent beings. You making this argument is beyond stupid.

 

[Midswat]

Discrimination for all!

I disagree. I don't think it's right to discrimination against race, religion, sex, national origin, or familial status.

 

[LAZARUS_LOGAN]

Because homosexuals do it in consenting fashion while pedophiles and zoophiles violate innocent beings. You making this argument is beyond stupid.

How do you know the animals are being violated, just because they cannot consent, they also cannot dissent. They can make that argument. Bottomline they are all PERVERSIONS.

 

[LAZARUS_LOGAN]

Because homosexuals do it in consenting fashion while pedophiles and zoophiles violate innocent beings. You making this argument is beyond stupid.

And since we are on the subject of violation, homosexuals and their ilk are in VIOLATION of God's law and/or nature's law.

 

[Cythim]

How do you know the animals are being violated, just because they cannot consent, they also cannot dissent. They can make that argument. Bottomline they are all PERVERSIONS.

Dissent doesn't matter, the fact that they cannot or do not consent make it a violation.

 

[Cythim]

And since we are on the subject of violation, homosexuals and their ilk are in VIOLATION of God's law and/or nature's law.

The Laws of your God do not govern what I do. He can go fuck himself.

Nature - a round peg fits in a round hole.

 

[Jon88]

On another board some geek/fag like BrainPaInt or however the fuck he spells his stupid name would have closed this thread a long time ago. That's why CowboysZone sucks ass.

 

[Cythim]

That's why CowboysZone sucks ass.

It must be pretty gay over there.