Deprecated: League\Flysystem\EventableFilesystem\EventableFilesystem::__construct(): Implicitly marking parameter $emitter as nullable is deprecated, the explicit nullable type must be used instead in /usr/www/dcu/public_html/src/vendor/league/flysystem-eventable-filesystem/src/EventableFilesystem.php on line 30
Deprecated: League\Flysystem\EventableFilesystem\EventableFilesystem::get(): Implicitly marking parameter $handler as nullable is deprecated, the explicit nullable type must be used instead in /usr/www/dcu/public_html/src/vendor/league/flysystem-eventable-filesystem/src/EventableFilesystem.php on line 98
Deprecated: Use of "parent" in callables is deprecated in /usr/www/dcu/public_html/src/vendor/league/flysystem-eventable-filesystem/src/EventableFilesystem.php on line 431
Deprecated: Callables of the form ["League\Flysystem\EventableFilesystem\EventableFilesystem", "parent::classhas"] are deprecated in /usr/www/dcu/public_html/src/vendor/league/flysystem-eventable-filesystem/src/EventableFilesystem.php on line 431
Deprecated: Use of "parent" in callables is deprecated in /usr/www/dcu/public_html/src/vendor/league/flysystem-eventable-filesystem/src/EventableFilesystem.php on line 431
Deprecated: Callables of the form ["League\Flysystem\EventableFilesystem\EventableFilesystem", "parent::classhas"] are deprecated in /usr/www/dcu/public_html/src/vendor/league/flysystem-eventable-filesystem/src/EventableFilesystem.php on line 431
Deprecated: Use of "parent" in callables is deprecated in /usr/www/dcu/public_html/src/vendor/league/flysystem-eventable-filesystem/src/EventableFilesystem.php on line 431
Deprecated: Callables of the form ["League\Flysystem\EventableFilesystem\EventableFilesystem", "parent::classhas"] are deprecated in /usr/www/dcu/public_html/src/vendor/league/flysystem-eventable-filesystem/src/EventableFilesystem.php on line 431
What you're REALLY trying to say is "you don't need a gun" and that's irrelevant. We have a RIGHT to keep and bear arms. There's no qualifiers in that. Whether you "need" a firearm or not is a silly childish argument. To keep and bear arms is a fucking RIGHT guaranteed in the Constitution. And it also forbids the government from INFRINGING on that right.
Each state has its own laws in that regard. I'm talking FEDERAL law. The FEDERAL statute is 5 years no parole, you must serve 85 percent of that. Make it 20 and make it mandatory to be charged federally.
The problem with federal law is that it's not applied equally and doesn't have to be applied at all. I'd bet most drug and gun arrests by feds are prosecuted in state courts.
The problem with federal law is that it's not applied equally and doesn't have to be applied at all. I'd bet most drug and gun arrests by feds are prosecuted in state courts.
If it's charged under federal statutes it's adjudicated in federal court. Doesn't matter who does the arrest. The AUSA for that district decides yea or nay. MY idea is, if it's felon in possession it HAS to be federal and you're lookin at 20 years in federal pen.
If it's charged under federal statutes it's adjudicated in federal court. Doesn't matter who does the arrest. The AUSA for that district decides yea or nay. MY idea is, if it's felon in possession it HAS to be federal and you're lookin at 20 years in federal pen.
My point is it doesn't HAVE to be federal. That's at the discretion of the federal prosecutor. Most of these cases go state and that was an issue when I was still working.
If they "go to state," federal laws don't apply and aren't used. States can't prosecute federal statutes.
If the state charges you with felon in possession they prosecute you using their statute. This does not stop the AUSA from also charging you federally. If he does, the state usually drops their complaint but it's not required.
I know you're aware of all this, I'm explaining it for other readers.
And that's what I'm saying needs changed, for felon in possession.
If they "go to state," federal laws don't apply and aren't used. States can't prosecute federal statutes.
If the state charges you with felon in possession they prosecute you using their statute. This does not stop the AUSA from also charging you federally. If he does, the state usually drops their complaint but it's not required.
I know you're aware of all this, I'm explaining it for other readers.
I'm aware of how the system works. What I'm saying is that federal level violators are often prosecuted in state court with state laws. Some states had 5 year mandatories for weapons offenses by prior felons or if a weapon was used during a felony but I don't know if that's the case any more.
Nobody's proposing that. There's nothing in what I've said that even suggests that. I'm saying that any arrest for FiP gets presented to the AUSA of that district. I want to change the federal FiP law by giving it a lot more teeth. No bargaining with it, no reduced sentence or dropped charge for cooperation. If the AUSA goes with it it's the whole truckload - 20 year minimum for conviction.
Some states had 5 year mandatories for weapons offenses by prior felons or if a weapon was used during a felony but I don't know if that's the case any more.
Even before the ink dries on a controversial new gun-control decision by the San Francisco-based 9th District Court of Appeals, firearms advocates are preparing to push it to the U.S. Supreme Court because it appears to rewrite the Second Amendment.In deciding Young v. State of Hawaii, the split...
Enjoy the Bear spray while you can, its only a matter of time until there's a mass bear spraying event and it will cancel this shit too because laws written on paper stop crimes, not guns or bear spray
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register. We also collect user agent strings for troubleshooting, compatibility and security purposes.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies and user agent data.