Everson Walls says that Romo has "tells"

[Jon88]

Hostile does...

Hostile knows everything...or claims to.

 

[Plymkr]

Didn't this place used to not edit the F word?

What the **** is going on here?

YOu are surrounded by thin skinned pussies my friend. So, fUCK is gone.

And, I loved Walls, but, fuck him.

ANyone that thinks Kitna is even remotely in Romo's league, are higher than fuck.


Huh??? Fuck is back? lol, it's like it is out of time out. lol

 

[Sheik]

And there you go.

 

[Plymkr]

And there you go.

Fuck, you know this ain't gonna last. lol...

 

[Sheik]

An interesting look into Plymkr's daily routine.

[video=youtube;Q-pqzAttoTY]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q-pqzAttoTY[/video]

 

[theogt]

Aikman had a laser arm but as a whole Romo is the more talented quarterback. Maybe Garrett can bring out the best in him. I have a ton of faith in Garrett.

I agree.

 

[marionbarberthe4th]

Theo setting the board on fire off the bat

 

[Clutch88]

Aikman had a laser arm but as a whole Romo is the more talented quarterback. Maybe Garrett can bring out the best in him. I have a ton of faith in Garrett.

unce:Clapunce:Clap:sbk92unce:Clap

 

[Clutch88]

Romo is extremely talented. He might be one of the best pure athletes in the league. But, he is undisciplined. And, in a way he is done in by his athleticism. He can do things that Troy Aikman, for example, could not do--like move. But, that ability frees him up to force the ball and make dumb plays. He has nothing like Aikman's discipline. And in the NFL, if you are undisciplined at Quarteback, you might put up big numbers like a Randall Cunningham did--but like Randall, you will never win it all.

 

[sbk92]

Yeah, so anyway. Over at the adult table. We're all talking about how Aikman had a vastly superior skill set.

Romo isn't in his league as a passer.

 

[Rock Slamdance]

And there you go.

lol

 

[Rock Slamdance]

An interesting look into Plymkr's daily routine.

[video=youtube;Q-pqzAttoTY]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q-pqzAttoTY[/video]

lol

 

[theogt]

Yeah, so anyway. Over at the adult table. We're all talking about how Aikman had a vastly superior skill set.

Romo isn't in his league as a passer.

I simply disagree. I think if you put Romo on that team, you'd think differently too. The issue isn't clear cut and there's some subjectiveness to it (though most of the objective measures point to Romo being the better QB). Since that's the case, the only wrong answer is assuming your answer is the obvious one.

 

[Rock Slamdance]

Yeah, so anyway. Over at the adult table. We're all talking about how Aikman had a vastly superior skill set.

Romo isn't in his league as a passer.

Gotta agree with sbk.

Aikman is two country miles better than Romo. Every edge goes to him except athleticism.

 

[theogt]

Gotta agree with sbk.

Aikman is two country miles better than Romo. Every edge goes to him except athleticism.

In addition to being a better athlete, I think Romo is more accurate, has a better sense of timing, has better pocket presence, and a better field of view.

Just my opinion, though. These things aren't measurable, so that's all anyone can have is an opinion.

 

[Jon88]

Gotta agree with sbk.

Aikman is two country miles better than Romo. Every edge goes to him except athleticism.

Aikman was probably the most accurate quarterback of all time for various reasons. I still think Romo is the more talented qb overall, but he hasn't been able to put everything together.

 

[Rock Slamdance]

In addition to being a better athlete, I think Romo is more accurate, has a better sense of timing, has better pocket presence, and a better field of view.

Just my opinion, though. These things aren't measurable, so that's all anyone can have is an opinion.

I will consider giving you pocket presence...but no way is Romo more accurate and have better timing than Aikman. those two attributes were his strongest.

 

[Midswat]

Aikman had a stronger arm, was more accurate, and was a better leader -- and I'm not a guy that bangs on Romo's leadership ability.

But Romo has moxie.... and lots of it.

:kool

 

[Sheik]

Romo is an awesome athlete.

Aikman was a pure passer.

It's easy to say Aikman was the better of the two because of all the success. Theo said put Romo in that offense, that makes it a little more interesting to me.

I would still have to go with Aikman. When he was at his best, he was deadly accurate. Couple that with his leadership and big game record, I have to go with him.

Romo will hold every passing record the franchise has by the time it's over. He probably has as many TDs as Aikman already and hasn't played 4 full seasons. Obviously doesn't say a whole lot considering what each QB is asked to do in his offense. Still impressive.

Huge Romo fan. Love what he brings to the table.

I go with Aikman if I'm starting a team today and both are the same age and in the same draft.

 

[sbk92]

I simply disagree. I think if you put Romo on that team, you'd think differently too. The issue isn't clear cut and there's some subjectiveness to it (though most of the objective measures point to Romo being the better QB). Since that's the case, the only wrong answer is assuming your answer is the obvious one.

There's no subjectiveness to it. It's clear cut and obvious.

If you polled the 32 GMs in football not a single one would take Romo over Aikman.