Dumb POS mods on the Zone deleting all negative posts related to Brent

[FuzzyLumpkins]

You keep having that fantasy. But actually a troll is defined as someone posting just to elicit a response. It's not confined or even defined as making someone "mad." It can be making them laugh at stupidity too, like what we have here, with you.
You are not bothering to read replies, another habitual mark of the troll.

Sorry if I missed the response could you please answer the question since I missed your previous response then?

 

[Doomsday]

You don't think they are trying to intimidate me into going away with the ridicule and the like?

I don't feel like getting into a semantic argument but to say there is not an exclusionary groupthink that lacks introspection going on then we will just have to agree to disagree.

"Many people disagree with me. Therefore it is a clique."

#fuzzyhostile

 

[Doomsday]

Sorry if I missed the response could you please answer the question since I missed your previous response then?

It's not my job to read this shit for you. Keep up with the conversation if you want to be a honest broker.

 

[Sheik]

If they're acting like dicks, just for the sake of acting like dicks, don't give them the satisfaction of entertaining their BS.

Don't play into it, when you notice the pile on, just ignore it. Pretty soon they'll figure out that it's a waste if time.

 

[Doomsday]

You don't think they are trying to intimidate me into going away with the ridicule and the like?

 

[Sheik]

Just my honest opinion on it. It's a very touchy topic for sure, but there's no need to pile on.

 

[Doomsday]

Just my honest opinion on it. It's a volatile topic for sure, but there's no need to pile on.

At least here, we get to talk about it without posts being deleted and people getting banned. Brent isn't "protected."

 

[FuzzyLumpkins]

It's not my job to read this shit for you. Keep up with the conversation if you want to be a honest broker.

You can say that you are not made but a response like this to a polite request speaks to a different thing. You certainly like the cowardly dissembling route.

You said that if another team wanted to trade for his rights fine. when he retired he went on the teams retired list and retained his rights. When he is reinstated to the league I am not sure if he is required to honor the remainder of his contract or if it is up to the team to extend a contract but when he is reinstated the team has a choice to make.

That is the choice that I am speaking of and the one you are so desperate to dissemble from. It speaks to a severe insecurity that you do this but whatever.

 

[Doomsday]

"But he is SUCH a good guy and a good player, he just made one little mistake and he's sorry..."

Appealing the 10 game suspension and the intensive monitoring requirements.

Shows he's really sorry donut?

 

[Doomsday]

You can say that you are not made but a response like this to a polite request speaks to a different thing. You certainly like the cowardly dissembling route.

I already answered the fucking question, it's not my fault you "missed" it. It is still there for all to read.

 

[FuzzyLumpkins]

View attachment 2535

I'm not crying. If you want me to leave then you had best ban me.

and not mad. you are trying so hard to get digs in on me it's pathetic.

You still lack critical thinking skills and are a rank intellectual coward.

 

[FuzzyLumpkins]

I already answered the fucking question, it's not my fault you "missed" it. It is still there for all to read.

not mad

what a tool

 

[Doomsday]

I'm not crying.

Sure you are, crying and whining about poor #fuzzyhostile getting picked on.

New smilie for you, coming up!

 

[Sheik]

At least here, we get to talk about it without posts being deleted and people getting banned. Brent isn't "protected."

True.

I just think the tone is a few levels too high. Maybe I'm wrong.

Fuzzy didn't tuck tale and scurry back to the zone. He's here to debate/converse, not play CZ vs. DCU.

 

[Doomsday]

If you want me to leave then you had best ban me.

There you go again, making incorrect assumptions and putting words in people's mouths.

Paranoid much?

 

[FuzzyLumpkins]

"But he is SUCH a good guy and a good player, he just made one little mistake and he's sorry..."

Appealing the 10 game suspension and the intensive monitoring requirements.

Shows he's really sorry donut?

His agents argument makes sense and every man deserves the right to appeal. He did retire at a request from the league and had missed 20 games up to that point. Considering multiple precedents an expectation of fairness is not remiss in my view.

 

[Doomsday]

Fuzzy didn't tuck tale and scurry back to the zone. He's here to debate/converse, not play CZ vs. DCU.

But, the thread is about CZ. There's another strictly Brent thread #fuzzyhostile avoided, but did read.

 

[Doomsday]

He did retire at a request from the league

It was not a request from the league. It was totally voluntary. That's the basis for the idiot appeal, "we didn't make them cut me so i shouldn't have to be suspended or monitored."

 

[FuzzyLumpkins]

There you go again, making incorrect assumptions and putting words in people's mouths.

Paranoid much?

Go home fuzzy, you're embarrassing yourself.

This is what I am talking about when I talk of poor critical thinking skills.

 

[Doomsday]

Were he really interested in showing contrition, he would take his fucking medicine and deal and count his lucky stars he might get a NFL job again.