dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
58,664
Reaction score
9,123
There's this weird thing where some people support the best possible candidate, rather than just simply checking the R or D box. It's obvious that you have no interest in anything but partisan talking points, so this may come as a surprise, but some people do actually educate themselves on the candidates' positions and THEN decide which party would better serve America.

Shocking, I know.

If he was supporting the best candidate, that'd be fine. if he were a lifelong democrat, it'd be fine. If he had just up and changed his tune one day and decided he didnt like the Republicans and wanted to be seen as a Dem, that'd be fine.

But EVERYONE knows that isnt why he did what he did, and thats why I have a problem with it. He supports Obama because he is black, period, end of story. If Obama were white, Powell would have never given him the time of day.

Dems and Libs scream racism every chance they get, but its their own party thats far more racist than any other.
 
Last edited:

junk

UDFA
Messages
2,719
Reaction score
0
If he was supporting the best candidate, that'd be fine. if he were a lifelong democrat, it'd be fine. If he had just up and changed his tune one day and decided he didnt like the Republicans and wanted to be seen as a Dem, that'd be fine.

But EVERYONE knows that isnt why he did what he did, and thats why I have a problem with it. He supports Obama because he is black, period, end of story. If Obama were white, Powell would have never given him the time of day.

Dems and Libs screan racism every chance they get, but its their own party thats far more racist than any other.

Maybe. Or maybe the last Republican administration that he worked for made him look like a fool on a national stage and his view of the world has changed a little bit.

Powell has been fairly liberal on other issues in the past as well.

For the record, I'd rather have Powell running than either of these other two jokers.
 

Sheik

All-Pro
Messages
24,809
Reaction score
5
Ginny Lewis, a Democrat and 72-year-old retired district attorney from Princeton, Ky., says she'll vote for Romney because "I'm tired of the Republicans blaming all the debt on Democrats, so let them take over and see what they do."

lol lol lol

That was taken from an article on Romney closing the gap with women.
 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
58,664
Reaction score
9,123
Ginny Lewis, a Democrat and 72-year-old retired district attorney from Princeton, Ky., says she'll vote for Romney because "I'm tired of the Republicans blaming all the debt on Democrats, so let them take over and see what they do."

lol lol lol

That was taken from an article on Romney closing the gap with women.

Glad she is voting Romney, but the fact is the dems are repsonsible for a significant portion of the debt. They controlled congress for Bush's last two years, and they had complete control of everything Obama's first two years and a super majority in the senate. They've had the WH and senate the last two years.
 

superpunk

Pro Bowler
Messages
11,003
Reaction score
0
Ginny Lewis, a Democrat and 72-year-old retired district attorney from Princeton, Ky., says she'll vote for Romney because "I'm tired of the Republicans blaming all the debt on Democrats, so let them take over and see what they do."

lol lol lol

That was taken from an article on Romney closing the gap with women.

That seems to be about as deep as most republican voters are thinking about this election.
 

jeebus

UDFA
Messages
1,650
Reaction score
0
That seems to be about as deep as most republican voters are thinking about this election.

It must be hard on you. Your candidates only acomplishment is hated by the American people. Everything he has done he has done badly. He has flat out failed on the economy. He offered no vision for the next for years, he showed himself to be a true whore who puts elections above the country. Then despite all this, you have to make it seem like the other side is mindless following their guy. They don like your guy because he is as affective as jimmy carter.

But you are dbairs retarded brother so you love him and hate Romney. You know, the guy who didn't make his millions being a failure and sucking on America's tit.

Hell is it no wonder that Obama is for government redistribution and affirmative action, it has made him a millionaire.
 

superpunk

Pro Bowler
Messages
11,003
Reaction score
0
You know, the guy who didn't make his millions being a failure and sucking on America's tit.

If you think that's true then you don't know anything about how Romney made his money. Feel free to start here;

The reality is that toward the middle of his career at Bain, Romney made a fateful strategic decision: He moved away from creating companies like Staples through venture capital schemes, and toward a business model that involved borrowing huge sums of money to take over existing firms, then extracting value from them by force. He decided, as he later put it, that "there's a lot greater risk in a startup than there is in acquiring an existing company." In the Eighties, when Romney made this move, this form of financial piracy became known as a leveraged buyout, and it achieved iconic status thanks to Gordon Gekko in Wall Street. Gekko's business strategy was essentially identical to the Romney–Bain model, only Gekko called himself a "liberator" of companies instead of a "helper."

It's cute that you just decided to attack me rather than try to get into an actual argument with facts again - it was a smart move because good lord have you been fucking those up lately.
 

jeebus

UDFA
Messages
1,650
Reaction score
0
If you think that's true then you don't know anything about how Romney made his money. Feel free to start here


ly.

Yea making your money in the corporate world > becoming a millionaire politician who has never had a real job, ever.

Truthfully, in my house speaking of becoming a millionaire through politics would be considered shameful. Corporate raider, not so much.
It's cute that you just decided to attack me rather than try to get into an actual argument with facts again - it was a smart move because good lord have you been fucking those up late
Whatever is due.

Tell me again how many more and how much newer our aircraft carriers are.
 

superpunk

Pro Bowler
Messages
11,003
Reaction score
0
Truthfully, in my house speaking of becoming a millionaire through politics would be considered shameful. Corporate raider, not so much

Tell that to all the employees of many companies who've lost their jobs due to Mitt taking their company over, over-leveraging it and then bankrupting it while he ran off with millions in "management fees". I wonder which career path they think is more honorable. So brave...
 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
58,664
Reaction score
9,123
After todays news with the new Libya details SP, you shoukld be fucking ashamed to support this anti-American piece of garbage President.

Its sickening, and this guy should be impeached first thing Monday morning.
 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
58,664
Reaction score
9,123
What news was broke today?

Its so sickening I dont even want to talk about it.

My father proudly served this country for 21 years, I'm sure he is turning over in his grave.

Just impaeach the motherfucker.
 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
58,664
Reaction score
9,123
It's too traumatic to even speak of.

lol

You can kleep being a fucking dick if you want SP, but this crap is disgusting. Obama basically executed those 4 people.

He's a fucking coward and a criminal. Biggest disgrace/black eye to this country, EVER.
 

superpunk

Pro Bowler
Messages
11,003
Reaction score
0
So Obama basically killed those people but he gets no credit for Bin Laden?

Make up your mind.
 

superpunk

Pro Bowler
Messages
11,003
Reaction score
0
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...ormation-to-intervene-during-benghazi-attack/

idk my bff jill?

The U.S. military did not quickly intervene during the attack on the U.S. Consulate in Libya last month because military leaders did not have adequate intelligence information and felt they should not put American forces at risk, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta said Thursday.

In his most extensive comments to date on the unfolding controversy surrounding the attack in Benghazi, Panetta said U.S. forces were on heightened alert because of the anniversary of 9/11 and prepared to respond. But, he said, the attack happened over a few hours and was over before the U.S. had the chance to know what was really happening.

"(The) basic principle is that you don't deploy forces into harm's way without knowing what's going on; without having some real-time information about what's taking place," Panetta told Pentagon reporters. "And as a result of not having that kind of information, the commander who was on the ground in that area, Gen. Ham, Gen. Dempsey and I felt very strongly that we could not put forces at risk in that situation."

Panetta was referring to Gen. Carter Ham, the head of U.S. Africa Command, and Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

Maybe david has access to something else.
 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
58,664
Reaction score
9,123

Gee, was watching it going on on live TV/computer monitors not good enough? Holy fuck man, quit being a stooge for your party and think. What did these goons believe was happening, early Halloweeen/Trick or Treat?

3 times the CIA requested military intervention, they even had laser targeting on the mortars ready to eliminate them. Obama (or someone in his adminstration told them to STAND DOWN. One of our brave young men finally IGNORED the roder and went in anyway, trying to save those at the consulate,and he was killed by one of the mortar shots we could have taken out.
 
Top Bottom