superpunk

Pro Bowler
Messages
11,003
Reaction score
0
I already addressed what you said. 2 weeks of factual evidence supports my stance. Your president had no interest in telling the Anerican people the truth about Benghazi-Gate.

He vaguely mentions that no act of terror will ever shake, blah blah blah, but sends out his minions to blame a video. Himself, Hillary, Susan rice, Jay Carney all blame it for weeks.

He never said that the attack was a terrorist attack. He mentioned, again, "any act of terror".

Theres a difference. Wether you want to admit it or not, the two weeks that followed that comment backs up VA's and My point.

I'll ask you again, if he was specifically calling it a terror attack, and not just vaguely mentioning the words "act of terror", then what is the excuse for blaming a disgusting video for weeks after?

If only your boy had said a damn thing about any of that last night - but he didn't. He specifically wanted to make an issue out of whether Obama called it an act of terror in the Rose Garden and I'm sorry sheik, but if you want to keep denying what's in black and white there's just no helping you.
 
Messages
1,274
Reaction score
0
It's right there in black and white. He says act of terror then says justice will be done for this terrible act.

You're seeing what you want to see even when I've typed it all out and highlighted it for you. Responding to that clear transcript with "nuh-uh he was vague" is not a rebuttal. Romney didn't claim he was vague he claimed he never said it.

Why did his UN Ambassador report to the UN that it was a spontaneous act based on a proteest over a religious video?
 

Sheik

All-Pro
Messages
24,809
Reaction score
5
If only your boy had said a damn thing about any of that last night - but he didn't. He specifically wanted to make an issue out of whether Obama called it an act of terror in the Rose Garden and I'm sorry sheik, but if you want to keep denying what's in black and white there's just no helping you.

Do you know what the subject of the final debate is, SP?
 

superpunk

Pro Bowler
Messages
11,003
Reaction score
0
If only your boy had said a damn thing about any of that last night - but he didn't. He specifically wanted to make an issue out of whether Obama called it an act of terror in the Rose Garden and I'm sorry sheik, but if you want to keep denying what's in black and white there's just no helping you.

Why did his UN Ambassador report to the UN that it was a spontaneous act based on a proteest over a religious video?

Why do you guys keep trying to change the subject?
 
Messages
2,064
Reaction score
0
Poor SP, trying to cling to some vague terror comment because he can't talk about Obama's record on the economy or anything remotely relevant. lol
 

superpunk

Pro Bowler
Messages
11,003
Reaction score
0
Poor SP, trying to cling to some vague terror comment because he can't talk about Obama's record on the economy or anything remotely relevant. lol

Hmmmm...who was the first person in this thread to try to make the Libya terror comment into an issue? Man let's see....

Candy just sat there and blatantly lied defending the President's lie about the terrorist statement. He never said that the day after.

Oops. Now you look stupid twice. Or like 80 times. I'm losing track.
 
Messages
2,064
Reaction score
0
Hmmmm...who was the first person in this thread to try to make the Libya terror comment into an issue? Man let's see....

Oops. Now you look stupid twice. Or like 80 times. I'm losing track.

I made Candy lying for Obama an issue. The topic regarding the lie was secondary. But yes, I understand you don't want to talk about the soaring debt and deficit and gas prices, etc so you can cling to this one issue.
 

Bob Sacamano

All-Pro
Messages
26,436
Reaction score
3
Superpunk is fighting you all so hard because he doesnt want to give up his Obama phone.

Another campaign lie smh
 
Top Bottom