Debate 2

[superpunk]

He used the term acts of terror, but he was not referring to Libya at all. It was a vague term to describe previous terrorism.

Are you fucking serious, bro?

Enough with the spin it's there in black and white.

 

[carphalen5150]

So your position now is that, when he mentioned "acts of terror", in a speech about the attack in Libya, he could have been talking about absolutely anything.

Dude you really need to stop opening your mouth.

They have this cool thing called the internet...lots of info out there, you should look into it.

 

[superpunk]

Romney: Did you say act of terror?
Obama: Check the transcript

It's there. You got served up motherfucker.

 

[Sheik]

So your position now is that, when he mentioned "acts of terror", in a speech about the attack in Libya, he could have been talking about absolutely anything.

Dude you really need to stop opening your mouth.

He was vague, not calling it what it was.

Dont agree? Fine.

Susan Rice, Hillary Clinton, and your boy were blaming a video as long as 14 days later. A spontaneous attack caused by a YouTube video. They bought TV time in the Middle East to condemn the video. That's laughable.

There's no getting around that fact.

Obama vaguely mentions an act of terror the next day, then goes on to blame a YouTube video for weeks.

Its not difficult to understand what is/was going on.

 

[carphalen5150]

Are you fucking serious, bro?

Enough with the spin it's there in black and white.

I'm absolutely serious...I'm also serious when he does not refer to it as an act of terror, but that it escalated from a protest. Fell free to spin like Candy did.

 

[VA Cowboy]

Dude you really need to stop opening your mouth.

no u

 

[superpunk]

Its not difficult to understand what is/was going on.

Yeah you guys are so embarassed by your boy's snafu that you're willing to spin what's plainly in black and white. Romney wanted to press him on whether he said act of terror the next day (your boy even used the exact same fucking phrase Obama used) Obama said go to the transcript, your boy stuttered like a fool.

Boom. There it is in the transcript.

 

[VA Cowboy]

Originally Posted by VA Cowboy
SP, let's talk about how Obama cut the deficit in half like he promised.

Or how about getting that $9 trillion debt under control since it's so unfair for future generations all the while it's now over $16 trillion.

....you can respond anytime

~whistling~

 

[Sheik]

Yeah you guys are so embarassed by your boy's snafu that you're willing to spin what's plainly in black and white. Romney wanted to press him on whether he said act of terror the next day (your boy even used the exact same fucking phrase Obama used) Obama said go to the transcript, your boy stuttered like a fool.

Boom. There it is in the transcript.

No hope for you, Friend.

 

[superpunk]

No hope for you, Friend.

Honestly I expect it at this point from retards like Bach but not you.

When does "act of terror" not mean "act of terror". Tune in at 11 when dcu's own republican spin machine of people who can't read tell you exactly that.

He could have been talking about anything!

 

[superpunk]

Romney: On the day after the attack, you went into the Rose Garden, and said that this was an "act of terror"
Obama: *nods*
Romney (incredulous): You said, the day after the attack, in the Rose Garden, that it was an act of terror? It was not a spontaneous demonstration? Is that what you're saying?
Obama: Please proceed, Governor
Romney (stuttering): I want to make sure we get that for the record.

Check the transcript. Romney got fucked up on that one.

"No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for. Today we mourn four more Americans who represent the very best of the United States of America. We will not waver in our commitment to see that justice is done for this terrible act. And make no mistake, justice will be done."

MAN HE WAS SO VAGUE HE COULD HAVE BEEN TALKING ABOUT ANYTHING

Get real.

 

[VA Cowboy]

In 2008 Obama calls adding $4 trillion in debt over Bush's 8 years "unpatriotic". In the last 4 years Obama has added more than that.

~crickets~

 

[Sheik]

Honestly I expect it at this point from retards like Bach but not you.

When does "act of terror" not mean "act of terror". Tune in at 11 when dcu's own republican spin machine of people who can't read tell you exactly that.

He could have been talking about anything!

All I'll say is, pay close attention to what happens the next few days.

You declared Biden the winner of last weeks debate. The 7 day rolling average still shows Romney pulling away among likely voters.

Someone is going off pure emotion in this conversation, hint: it's not me.

 

[superpunk]

All I'll say is, pay close attention to what happens the next few days.

You declared Biden the winner of last weeks debate. The 7 day rolling average still shows Romney pulling away among likely voters.

Someone is going off pure emotion in this conversation, hint: it's not me.

What does any of that have to do with what I wrote?

 

[VA Cowboy]

Even MSNBC's undecideds swinging towards Romney:

[video=youtube;JDanNdzAUn0]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDanNdzAUn0[/video]

 

[carphalen5150]

Romney: On the day after the attack, you went into the Rose Garden, and said that this was an "act of terror"
Obama: *nods*
Romney (incredulous): You said, the day after the attack, in the Rose Garden, that it was an act of terror? It was not a spontaneous demonstration? Is that what you're saying?
Obama: Please proceed, Governor
Romney (stuttering): I want to make sure we get that for the record.

Check the transcript. Romney got fucked up on that one.

"No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for. Today we mourn four more Americans who represent the very best of the United States of America. We will not waver in our commitment to see that justice is done for this terrible act. And make no mistake, justice will be done."

MAN HE WAS SO VAGUE HE COULD HAVE BEEN TALKING ABOUT ANYTHING

Get real.

He was vague...you are seeing what you want to see. His UN Ambassador told a different story 4 days later...maybe one day they'll all say the same thing.

 

[superpunk]

Romney: On the day after the attack, you went into the Rose Garden, and said that this was an "act of terror"
Obama: *nods*
Romney (incredulous): You said, the day after the attack, in the Rose Garden, that it was an act of terror? It was not a spontaneous demonstration? Is that what you're saying?
Obama: Please proceed, Governor
Romney (stuttering): I want to make sure we get that for the record.

Check the transcript. Romney got fucked up on that one.

"No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for. Today we mourn four more Americans who represent the very best of the United States of America. We will not waver in our commitment to see that justice is done for this terrible act. And make no mistake, justice will be done."

MAN HE WAS SO VAGUE HE COULD HAVE BEEN TALKING ABOUT ANYTHING

Get real.

He was vague...you are seeing what you want to see. His UN Ambassador told a different story 4 days later...maybe one day they'll all say the same thing.

It's right there in black and white. He says act of terror then says justice will be done for this terrible act.

You're seeing what you want to see even when I've typed it all out and highlighted it for you. Responding to that clear transcript with "nuh-uh he was vague" is not a rebuttal. Romney didn't claim he was vague he claimed he never said it.

 

[VA Cowboy]

Gallup Poll: Romney 51% Obama 45%

http://www.gallup.com/poll/157817/election-2012-likely-voters-trial-heat-obama-romney.aspx

 

[Sheik]

What does any of that have to do with what I wrote?

I already addressed what you said. 2 weeks of factual evidence supports my stance. Your president had no interest in telling the Anerican people the truth about Benghazi-Gate.

He vaguely mentions that no act of terror will ever shake, blah blah blah, but sends out his minions to blame a video. Himself, Hillary, Susan rice, Jay Carney all blame it for weeks.

He never said that the attack was a terrorist attack. He mentioned, again, "any act of terror".

Theres a difference. Wether you want to admit it or not, the two weeks that followed that comment backs up VA's and My point.

I'll ask you again, if he was specifically calling it a terror attack, and not just vaguely mentioning the words "act of terror", then what is the excuse for blaming a disgusting video for weeks after?

 

[Sheik]

Please, SP, focus on the last paragraph of my last post.

Spin that. I know you have it in you.