Messages
8,660
Reaction score
0
Damned Tony Romo
By Chris Arnold | 105.3 The Fan
October 9, 2013 11:20 AM

ARLINGTON (105.3 THE FAN) – Men lie. Women lie. Numbers don’t lie. And if you can’t handle the truth about Tony Romo, stop reading right now.

Damned Tony Romo! Because he’s the quarterback for America’s Team, where Jerry Jones sets the bar at “Super Bowl or bust” every season. Romo is damned if he does or damned if he doesn’t.

His incredible performance this season against the Denver Broncos, a Cowboys franchise record 506 yards passing and 5 touchdowns, included a game changing interception. Damn! It seemed to be a microcosm of his career! It had Romo haters screaming “Choke Artist!” from coast to coast. And it had Romo supporters arguing it was the Cowboys’ defense that cost them a 51-48 defeat at the hands of the best quarterback in the game today, Peyton Manning.

Damn! Romo can’t win the perception game. If Romo had led his team to the game winning field goal, would Denver fans be roasting Manning or ripping their own defense for giving up half a hundred points to Dallas?

Perception sucks. And the perception is, Romo can’t win a big game and cannot bring a team back from behind in the 4th quarter. This perception is the Big Lie. Romo has done all of those things and more, at a higher rate than some of the best quarterbacks in the league. They get a pass on their failures, some because their teams have won Super Bowls or playoff games, or some because most of their failures weren’t televised to the majority of the country each week. Romo does not have the rings, but that does Not mean he’s a Choke Artist. He’s actually one of the most clutch quarterbacks in the NFL today. WTF?

The problem is this, Romo is held to a ridiculously high standard that no other quarterback is held to. Nothing short of a Super Bowl MVP season would make detractors realize Romo is a very good quarterback on a not so good team. The bottom line is Romo can never be a Super Bowl MVP without a better team around him. Period.

Romo is clutch? Don’t worry, I can prove it. The numbers don’t lie. What made me dig deep and research this was the fact that Romo has the highest 4th quarter quarterback rating of any quarterback since the year 2000. 100.7 going into this season. Yes, higher than Manning, Brady & Rodgers. So how could he own that lofty rating if he was a bonified choke artist? It seemed impossible to me. He couldn’t possibly be both.

For “Next Level Analysis”, let’s check the numbers:

We know Romo isn’t a bus driver. He has thrown for over 300 yards a total of 41 times and has 51 games with a passer rating over 100.0 (minimum 15 attempts). His 7.94 yards per attempt is the seventh highest in NFL history. He’s not conservative.

Romo has seven straight seasons with a passer rating of at least 90.0 (minimum 200 attempts). Only Steve Young (1991-98) and Peyton Manning (2003-10) have ever done that. Romo’s 95.6 passer rating is fifth all time.

In the only season Romo had a top 10 defense (2009), he won a playoff game. Coincidence? Hmm… Maybe he needs a better team around him? He’s historically productive, efficient, wins more than he loses and he has the rare skills to buy time in the pocket and make big plays. Oh, but that still doesn’t satisfy the doubters who say Romo has never “carried or lifted” a team to clutch victories like the great quarterbacks are supposed to do. No one it seems, can remember the last time Romo brought the Cowboys from behind to win a game. Are you kidding me?

Tony Romo has the franchise record for most come from behind victories with 18. Yep, more than Aikman, Staubach and Meredith. Still not good enough, huh? How about this fact: Romo has the 2nd most 4th quarter comeback wins in the NFL since 2011 with 9! Only Eli Manning had more with 10. You want more? Romo has 9 game-winning drives (3rd behind Eli’s 11 and Matt Ryan’s 10) since 2011.

While many bash Romo for choking, it’s amazing how they can’t seem to remember the last time Romo had a 4th quarter comeback victory! They only vaguely remember the 2011 overtime win in San Francisco with Romo playing with a punctured lung. How quickly the experts forget that last season Romo set a Cowboys franchise record with FIVE comeback wins for a season!

In fact, Romo became the first quarterback in team history to lead 3 consecutive comebacks and game-winning drives in Weeks 13-15. The 9-point comeback Romo led in Cincinnati was the only time the Bengals allowed 20 points in their final nine games. He followed that up with a 14-point comeback in the final 4:45 to force overtime with New Orleans before going on to lose 34-31. But all everyone remembers is the last game against the Redskins and his last pick.

Like clockwork, Romo had one of his worst moments when the Nielsen ratings were at their highest. His interception late in the fourth quarter with Dallas trailing 21-18 was a killer. All the hard work put in, all the successful drives wasted with one snap. And like that, Romo further securing his ridiculous national choker status.That’s Romo’s problem. He’s good enough, often great even, to put Dallas in positions to do something, but it just seems like the errors come when everyone in the nation’s watching.

Nobody cares that the Cowboys started last season 3-5, that Romo led the Cowboys from a 23-0 deficit to the Giants, only to lose the greatest comeback win in team history by the size of Dez Bryant’s fingers. Or that they lost on the final play of the game against eventual champion Baltimore on a missed Dan Bailey field goal 31-29. Those games, like the Denver game this season, do nothing to boost Romo’s reputation because they are all losses.

So let’s compare. Does Romo fail more in the clutch than some of the biggest names in the game today? The numbers say Romo IS clutch, and in some cases even more clutch than those with gaudy reputations.

Romo’s clutch track record is too good to only remember the bad plays. His records at comebacks and game-winning drive opportunities put him right there, compared to reputation, with today’s current top quarterbacks, especially the likes of Drew Brees, Philip Rivers and Aaron Rodgers.

Let’s take a “Next Level Analysis” look at Romo in the clutch. Tony Romo has 19 career game wining drives since he became a starting quarterback. Looking deeper, he has 10 turnovers in 27 games that the game winning drive failed. Sounds like a choke huh? Welp, let’s look at Phillip Rivers who also became a starter in 2006. Rivers has 22 turnovers in 36 game winning drive failures. That’s 10 vs 22! Also, Rivers was 2-19 in game winning drives going into this season. Who’s the better quarterback?

It’s no different for Aaron Rogers and Drew Brees, who each won a Super Bowl when their defense stepped up with several critical takeaways and stops during the postseason. (Peyton Manning & Eli Manning too, but we’ll leave them out of this one)

The national media and pro football fans ignore the fact that Rogers is an amazing 0-18 in 4th quarter comebacks against teams that are .500 or better in his career! They ignore that Drew Brees has only made the playoffs 5 times in 12 years and has 20 turnovers in clutch drive ending losses (compared to Romo’s 10). Those quarterbacks get the pass because they have a ring. Rivers? His reputation as being clutch is fiction.

No one’s trying to put Romo in the Hall of Fame or on the same pedestal as Peyton Manning and Tom Brady, but the facts remain that he’s very good and gets held to one of the more ridiculous standards in the league. There are other quarterbacks blowing games more often than Romo, and there aren’t as many giving their team a chance to win as Romo. Yet Romo, who delivers more times in the clutch than many others, is considered a choke artist.

In a league that savors top picks at quarterback, we should be celebrating Romo as one of the best undrafted quarterbacks in NFL history. His success story should be something for all kids who dream of possibly making it in the NFL one day. Instead he gets held to all or nothing standards. Why do we hold Romo to a higher standard than most quarterbacks who are drafted in the first round? It must be a Cowboys bias. I shake my head.

So to come full circle. Men lie. Women lie. Even media and fans lie. Numbers don’t lie. Tony Romo is one of the most clutch quarterbacks in the NFL today, and with a better team around him he could get a Super Bowl ring and maybe his true reputation will be celebrated. Until then, perception continues to distort reality. Damn.
 

Hoofbite

Draft Pick
Messages
4,231
Reaction score
0
The team he plays on is shit.

Without him, Dallas is easily one of the worst 5 teams in the NFL. Not as bad as Jacksonville but not good enough to sweep the Jaguars in a series if you were to pit them against one another.

The team lacks depth almost across the board. They invest so much into starting players that they have guys like Will Allen starting week 1 and cut week 5.

The Browns are 3-2 with Weeden and some random at QB. You put that type of shitty QB play on the Dallas team and they won't win more than 5 games.

When Romo is gone, people will see what a joke this franchise has become because Dallas will be the Lions of the early 2000s. Constantly shitty and picking in the top 10 every year.
 
Messages
10,636
Reaction score
0
The team he plays on is shit.

Without him, Dallas is easily one of the worst 5 teams in the NFL. Not as bad as Jacksonville but not good enough to sweep the Jaguars in a series if you were to pit them against one another.

The team lacks depth almost across the board. They invest so much into starting players that they have guys like Will Allen starting week 1 and cut week 5.

The Browns are 3-2 with Weeden and some random at QB. You put that type of shitty QB play on the Dallas team and they won't win more than 5 games.

When Romo is gone, people will see what a joke this franchise has become because Dallas will be the Lions of the early 2000s. Constantly shitty and picking in the top 10 every year.

I told dbair last year that Kansas City was legit and just needed a qb. I told him they have every bit the blue choppers we do. Like always I was right.

The bottom line with romo is if you walk the right rope 24/7 you're going to have a lot of highlights and lowlights. It's just constant close games and we need plays made out of nothing
 

jnday

UDFA
Messages
2,680
Reaction score
0
This is a case where stats and numbers don't tell the whole story. I am no Romo hater, but if Romo is in a big game with two min. on the clock, I have come to expect a big screwup. He simply does not have the best judgement when the pressure is on. If he is in a situation against an average team, he can pull off a winning drive. When he is faced with a big game situation he screws up more times than not. I don't know if the guy is just cursed, or if he is just dumb, but he has blew too many big games for him to escape the blame. There is a definite pattern in these situations and it is not a pattern of winning the big games.
 
Messages
46,859
Reaction score
5
Listen, I understand that without Tony, we'd be a 2-14 team. I tell people that at work.

My problem is... why is he so fantastic the first 58 minutes, able to carry the team and give us fans hope, only to routinely crumble in the last two minutes of critical games.

I mean... it's like having a sexy girlfriend who gets you all worked up, titties all hanging out, lace panties, dancing around, giving you a lap dance and then when you think you're going to have sex she poops on herself.

Hell... I'd almost rather be that 2-14 team instead of having Tony Romo fill us fans with false hopes and even worse giving Jerry false hope. Let us be a bottom feeder so that dick head Jerry either dies of frustration or steps aside and lets someone else run the ship.
 
Messages
10,636
Reaction score
0
The article did the math, so.....list the fuck ups. I can think of like 6 or 7 wtf u so sucky moments.

He had 5(FIVE) come from behind game winning drives just last year.more if Garrett doesn't go full ****** in baltimore and Arizona
 

jnday

UDFA
Messages
2,680
Reaction score
0
The article did the math, so.....list the fuck ups. I can think of like 6 or 7 wtf u so sucky moments.

He had 5(FIVE) come from behind game winning drives just last year.more if Garrett doesn't go full ****** in baltimore and Arizona
It seems like he can pull some games out when they are not considered big games against good teams. Romo seems to choke at his best in prime time games and games with playoff implications.
 

jnday

UDFA
Messages
2,680
Reaction score
0
Listen, I understand that without Tony, we'd be a 2-14 team. I tell people that at work.

My problem is... why is he so fantastic the first 58 minutes, able to carry the team and give us fans hope, only to routinely crumble in the last two minutes of critical games.

I mean... it's like having a sexy girlfriend who gets you all worked up, titties all hanging out, lace panties, dancing around, giving you a lap dance and then when you think you're going to have sex she poops on herself.

Hell... I'd almost rather be that 2-14 team instead of having Tony Romo fill us fans with false hopes and even worse giving Jerry false hope. Let us be a bottom feeder so that dick head Jerry either dies of frustration or steps aside and lets someone else run the ship.

I had rather seen them blow the team up and get away from Romo. I could live with the 2-14 record if I knew that they was serious about rebuilding. Romo has flashes of greatness and then he throws a damn interception at the worst time possible. I have come to expect it from him in any meaningful game. I would rather see them get away from the older core of players that causes the heartbreak.
 
Messages
8,660
Reaction score
0
This is a case where stats and numbers don't tell the whole story. I am no Romo hater, but if Romo is in a big game with two min. on the clock, I have come to expect a big screwup. He simply does not have the best judgement when the pressure is on. If he is in a situation against an average team, he can pull off a winning drive. When he is faced with a big game situation he screws up more times than not. I don't know if the guy is just cursed, or if he is just dumb, but he has blew too many big games for him to escape the blame. There is a definite pattern in these situations and it is not a pattern of winning the big games.
You may say you're not a Romo hater, but this post is exactly what a Romo hater says.

"Stats are nice and all, but they don't tell the whole story. The story is that in big game situations he screws up more times than not. What's that you say? The numbers say that's not true? Well, that's how I remember it."
 

Angrymesscan

Practice Squad
Messages
316
Reaction score
0
Ok, so because Romo wasn't the one that fucked it up the game vs. Baltimore last year wasn't big?
I see how that works...
 
Messages
8,660
Reaction score
0
I'd almost rather be that 2-14 team instead of having Tony Romo fill us fans with false hopes and even worse giving Jerry false hope. Let us be a bottom feeder so that dick head Jerry either dies of frustration or steps aside and lets someone else run the ship.
I don't crave being a bottom feeder. It might be nice to get a high draft pick one year, but that's it. Jerry is never giving up control of this team while he's still able to speak. And I have no faith in him being able to rebuild a team.

Romo is the nut the blind squirrel found. If Jerry's still in control when he leaves, we're going to have another parade of QCars, Hutches, Leafs, Testaverdes, Bledsoes, Stoerners, and Hensons. That's not something I want.

I'd rather hope on the chance he hires some defensive genius who can make that unit respectable, and have a coach and offensive staff that starts letting Romo do what Romo does. If we have that team, we'll be in the hunt.
 

jnday

UDFA
Messages
2,680
Reaction score
0
You may say you're not a Romo hater, but this post is exactly what a Romo hater says.

"Stats are nice and all, but they don't tell the whole story. The story is that in big game situations he screws up more times than not. What's that you say? The numbers say that's not true? Well, that's how I remember it."

Do you really want to count all the big games that was lost due to Romo's mistakes? Even better, just name a couple of big games where Romo led a 4th quarter come-back. The key words to focus on is big games. He has had some comebacks against some average teams in games that really had no playoff implications. Just name a few big games where he played well and led his team to a playoff berth. I hope that you are not going to deny him blowing several big games. It has happened many times. He is a good QB that has a history of fading in pressure situations. I don't understand why fans can't accept that Romo has these faults.
 
Messages
8,660
Reaction score
0
Here's the problem with that... you trying to limit it to "big games" gives a vague qualification to begin the conversation. You're probably going to discount the game against the Saints and Bengals last year, but pump up the Redskins game because it fits your argument. That's exactly the point I'm trying to make. Romo haters have a biased view of his accomplishments, and claim they're not good enough because there have been failures.

That's why an article like this, where the numbers are easy to qualify... 4th quarter comebacks... is so much more convincing. The NFL is a league of parity by design. It doesn't matter who you're playing, a 4th quarter comeback should be a credit to the QB, especially when you have 5 in one season. It shouldn't be dismissed because of some subjective standard such as, "the game wasn't a big game."
 
Messages
46,859
Reaction score
5
Big game = win and you're in
Big game = title game (Divisional title, NFC title, SB title)
Big game = playoff game
 
Top Bottom