dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
60,854
Reaction score
10,906
If so it makes me wonder if Jimmy's having a say. Jerruh DID say Jimmy's back in an advisory role. If true we kind of have to rethink our opinions of decisions in Dallas.
We shall see, the track record is so bad that I'd have to see some real evidence for that to give them any credit.

But they should be looking at the Parsons situation as a potential opportunity to reshape the team for the next decade. They dont have a franchise QB and are going to need one. There are none in this draft (unless you just get damn lucky). Next year though is a potentially different story, so acquiring draft capital for 2026 should be something that a forward thinking franchise in need of a true #1 QB is thinking about. If I can get a 1st this yr AND next yr, plus a couple other picks or so then it should absolutely be considered, especially if it's with a team that probably isnt making a run for the the playoffs right now.

If they could convince Tennessee to take Parsons for their 1st and 4th this yr, they could potentially parlay that into NUMEROUS primo draft picks, even if they only moved down a few spots. The roster could be set for years to come, especially if they land a legit #1 QB next yr.
 

Doomsday

High Plains Drifter
Messages
22,532
Reaction score
5,308
We shall see, the track record is so bad that I'd have to see some real evidence for that to give them any credit.

But they should be looking at the Parsons situation as a potential opportunity to reshape the team for the next decade. They dont have a franchise QB and are going to need one. There are none in this draft (unless you just get damn lucky). Next year though is a potentially different story, so acquiring draft capital for 2026 should be something that a forward thinking franchise in need of a true #1 QB is thinking about. If I can get a 1st this yr AND next yr, plus a couple other picks or so then it should absolutely be considered, especially if it's with a team that probably isnt making a run for the the playoffs right now.

If they could convince Tennessee to take Parsons for their 1st and 4th this yr, they could potentially parlay that into NUMEROUS primo draft picks, even if they only moved down a few spots. The roster could be set for years to come, especially if they land a legit #1 QB next yr.
How is it we mere fans can see this and think this way, but Jerruh and clan can't?
 

bbgun

Administrator
Messages
15,250
Reaction score
2,492
Now if a team like New England offered their 1st and 3rd this yr and 1st next yr, I'm getting highly interested.
Any team that has to pay him big money is not gonna give us a boatload of picks. Why did Cleveland give us next to nothing for Cooper? Because they had to take on his salary.
 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
60,854
Reaction score
10,906
Any team that has to pay him big money is not gonna give us a boatload of picks. Why did Cleveland give us next to nothing for Cooper? Because they had to take on his salary.
Sure they would. He's an elite level pass rusher just coming into the prime of his career.

Cooper made had a large salary but had already been in the league for awhile and every team knew we had a major cap problem to go along with knowing we'd keep Lamb over Cooper. I think its obvious the Cowboys wanted to be rid of Cooper for other stuff as well.

The Bears traded a crap load of stuff to the Raiders and paid Khalil Mack. Multiple teams called the Browns about Myles Garrett and the Browns refused to trade him regardless of what the offer was, whomever got Garrett was going to pay him a boatload of money.

Parsons has massive trade value, he is young, proven and whatever team trades for him can sign him to a mega extension with cap charges they can control and manipulate from day one.

The one thing that could negate some value we could get for Parsons is while he doesnt have a no trade clause per se, any team trading for him is going to insist on being able to sign him longterm now. He can always bitch and moan and threaten to hold out if he doesnt like the destination.
 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
60,854
Reaction score
10,906
I asked Grok (Twitter/X AI) to peg Micah Parsons trade value:

Determining the exact trade value of Micah Parsons, the Dallas Cowboys' star linebacker and edge rusher, involves a mix of his on-field performance, age, contract status, and market trends for elite defensive players in the NFL. As of March 19, 2025, here’s an analysis based on available insights and historical comparisons:

Micah Parsons, at 25 years old, is one of the NFL’s premier defensive talents. He’s amassed 52.5 sacks in his first four seasons, earning two First-Team All-Pro selections, three Pro Bowl nods, and the 2021 Defensive Rookie of the Year award. His versatility—he plays both linebacker and edge rusher—and consistent production (13+ sacks in each of his last three seasons) make him a rare commodity. He’s currently in the final year of his rookie contract, with a 2025 fifth-year option salary of $24.007 million, after which he’d hit free agency unless extended or traded.

Trade value in the NFL often hinges on precedent. A common benchmark is the 2018 Khalil Mack trade, where the Oakland Raiders sent the then-27-year-old star to the Chicago Bears for two first-round picks, a sixth-round pick, and a third-round pick. Mack had 40.5 sacks over his first four seasons—comparable to Parsons’ 52.5—and was also pre-extension. Adjusting for inflation in player value and Parsons’ youth, his trade haul could exceed this. Another reference point is the rumored offer for Brian Burns in 2022, where the Los Angeles Rams reportedly offered two first-round picks and a second-round pick for the edge rusher, who had fewer accolades and just 9 sacks that year compared to Parsons’ dominance.

Analysts and insiders suggest Parsons could command a “king’s ransom.” NFL reporter Charles Robinson has argued that if Burns was worth two first-rounders, Parsons—younger, more productive, and with a stronger resume—could fetch at least three first-round picks. Others, like NFL.com’s Adam Rank, speculate a package might include multiple first-rounders plus additional assets, potentially players, akin to the Herschel Walker trade that reshaped the Cowboys in the ‘90s. The recent Myles Garrett extension (rumored at $40 million AAV) further elevates Parsons’ market, as teams trading for him would also need to pay a record-breaking contract, likely north of $40-45 million annually.
Given the Cowboys’ situation—coming off a poor 2024 season, with significant cap space tied to Dak Prescott and CeeDee Lamb—a trade isn’t unthinkable, though the team is reportedly leaning toward an extension. If they did move him, a realistic trade package might look like:
  • Two to three first-round picks: Reflecting his elite status and the premium on pass rushers.
  • A mid-round pick (e.g., a third or fourth): Adding depth to the deal.
  • Possibly a young player: A starter or high-upside prospect to offset losing Parsons’ immediate impact.
For example, a team like the Detroit Lions or Baltimore Ravens, both playoff contenders needing defensive juice, might offer two first-rounders, a third, and a role player. The exact value would depend on the acquiring team’s desperation, draft capital, and willingness to pay Parsons’ next contract. Posts on X and web discussions float ideas like pairing him with Travis Hunter plus a second-rounder, but that’s speculative and less grounded than pick-based projections.

In short, Micah Parsons’ trade value would likely start at two first-round picks and climb to three, plus additional assets, making him one of the most expensive players ever moved in NFL history—assuming the Cowboys entertain the idea.
 

bbgun

Administrator
Messages
15,250
Reaction score
2,492
Cooper made had a large salary but had already been in the league for awhile and every team knew we had a major cap problem to go along with knowing we'd keep Lamb over Cooper.
Thanks to Dak, we still have those problems, as evidenced by the bargain basement shopping during free agency. That doesn't scream "leverage" to me. If a team doesn't think we can afford him, or that we like but don't love him, we're not gonna get full value in return.

Parsons has massive trade value, he is young, proven and whatever team trades for him can sign him to a mega extension with cap charges they can control and manipulate from day one.

He has a lot of negatives as well. We see the explosive ability and the speed, but he's also a little light in the britches. He can get off to a hot start, but he wears down as the season progresses, can be schemed out of a play by smart o-coordinators and does next to nothing in playoff games. And I haven't even gotten to the unhelpful Twitter battles and podcast issues. You have to win before you podcast or get into flame wars with ex-teammates.
 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
60,854
Reaction score
10,906
Thanks to Dak, we still have those problems, as evidenced by the bargain basement shopping during free agency. That doesn't scream "leverage" to me. If a team doesn't think we can afford him, or that we like but don't love him, we're not gonna get full value in return.



He has a lot of negatives as well. We see the explosive ability and the speed, but he's also a little light in the britches. He can get off to a hot start, but he wears down as the season progresses, can be schemed out of a play by smart o-coordinators and does next to nothing in playoff games. And I haven't even gotten to the unhelpful Twitter battles and podcast issues. You have to win before you podcast or get into flame wars with ex-teammates.
Well we still have close to 50 million cap space right now so the two situations are not similar.

Parsons has immense trade value, the question is whether the Cowboys would even pursue it and if someone says "hey we'll give you a 2nd rd pick for him" then you just say fuck off and call it a day. But if they seriously pursued trading him, someone is going to pay a shit ton of draft picks to us and cash to him to get it done. His situation is nothing like Cooper's at all.
 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
60,854
Reaction score
10,906
As expected, Parsons singing another tune about money now.


Cowboys defensive end Micah Parsons is optimistic about getting a long-term deal with the team. The question is: When?

Clarence Hill of All City DLLS reports the Cowboys have yet to have “real talks” with Parsons’ agent, David Mulegheta, though a deal could come together quickly if both sides are motivated.

Parsons said Thursday he was unconcerned about not having a long-term agreement yet, adding he has spoken with owner Jerry Jones and executive vice president Stephen Jones around the team facility.

“It’s coming along well,” Parsons said, via Hill.

Parsons said late last season that he didn’t need $40 million annually, but since then, Browns edge rusher Myles Garrett and Bengals receiver Ja’Marr Chase reset the market for non-quarterbacks at more than $40 million. Parsons is expected to top the $40.25 million yearly average of Chase.
https://www.nbcsports.com/nfl/profootballtalk/rumor-mill/news/qb-joe-milton-visited-browns-this-week
Parsons acknowledged Thursday that "$40" million is real for him.

“I just played these last couple years on $2 [million] and $3 million,” Parsons said. “I think if I had $40 million, I’d be the happiest man alive. You go from playing for the league rookie minimum and get that big of a jump, I think anybody would be happy.”

Parsons played last season for a base salary of $2.989 million and is scheduled to play 2025 on the fifth-year option of $24.07 million.

He sent something of a message on social media Friday after Mulugheta negotiated big deals for Panthers cornerback Jaycee Horn and Texans cornerback Derek Stingley Jr.

“Some of these agents don’t have the best interest for y’all man!,” Parsons wrote. “Wake up. David Mulugheta has been showing it time and time again! It’s sad seeing some of these players get violated by teams because of lack of decency and effort by their agents!”

So, no, Parsons isn’t taking a hometown discount. With four Pro Bowls, two All-Pro citations and 52.5 sacks in four seasons, he has earned an extension that makes him the highest-paid non-quarterback in the league.
 
Last edited:

daboyz

🚀 Scientist
Messages
2,195
Reaction score
2,105
Parsons become a Prescott. It's ALL about the money. Like Prescott, he's average at his position. Highly overrated Parsons comes apart when playing decent opponents & that's exactly why he's not even in the top 10. How quickly he's forgotten that he was the happiest man alive being drafted into the NFL.

I'll be the happiest Dallas Cowboys fan alive if they trade his big mouth spoiled arz!20250323_183458.jpg
 
Top Bottom