More upside at this point and makes 100% effort. Players like Collins don't help you change, effort toughness or commitment. For the difference in price, going with Steele makes sense. He may not work out long term, but whatever dropoff in level of play isnt enough to warrant the price difference and lack of effort.
Opponents will have book now, on this D and its personnel. There's no way the takeaways and the scoring plays we saw last year come again this year. We snuck up on people with the new D last year, won't happen this year.
So he's good enough to start for a Super Bowl team but not us.
Right now that is nothing but pure speculation on your behalf.
Why didn't they find their own version of Steele instead of paying Collins?
They had a lot of cap space, they chose to spend it on what they thought were proven starting help on OL.
I think he just started practicing after some sort of "injury" along with "personal issues"
Historically, takeaway defenses such as we saw last year do not repeat the performance. So it's a bit more than just speculation.
Not speculation: Parson's career in Dallas will be wasted like Ware's was.
I think he was more of a sucker punch to opponents last year. They'll be looking for him this year. He ain't Lawrence Taylor.
Surgery required, projected out until mid December.
You believe Parsons is ordinary?
He had a better rookie yr than Taylor did when he was DROY and MVP that same year.
Maybe he retired just because he didnt want to be stuck in that shithole fucking dump people call California, and instead wants to live & work in a normal person area.
