- Thread starter marionbarberthe4th
- Start date
- Status
- Messages
- 2,189
- Reaction score
- 0
A moron like yourself actually thinks we are rooting for the offensive line to fail and its quite the contrary but if you going to tell me its a position of strength that you are as dumb as Middie told me you were
- Messages
- 11,877
- Reaction score
- 119
the same front office who originally tried to sell us that last year's o line was good enough?
but keep on buying what they're sellling. Wait, no reason to sell you, you're all in.
when you wonder why a certain political party's members just take anything like mindless sheep, think back to yourself and the Cowboys' Front Office.
inNo need to buy it, it just got proved on the field. We made improvement, faggots cried like little bitches when we had to trot out backups to our backups due to injury, we told faggots to calm down and wait to see what happens when we actually see the plan, faggots kept crying now they look stupid.
- Messages
- 15,236
- Reaction score
- 2,486
True. Even Murray's long run was the result of a busted play. The fair thing to say is that the o-line "survived" this game. When Frenchy gets overpowered on the second play of the game, that has nothing to do with "reps."
- Messages
- 11,877
- Reaction score
- 119
- Messages
- 15,236
- Reaction score
- 2,486
The Zone was always worse after a win compared to a loss. That disease seems to be spreading.
aww people are grumpy and don't want to take their medicine.
More than happy to jump to conclusions and just bash the shit out of the front office before even seeing the product on the field. Product gets on the field, plays...maybe not well, but better than expected against a great Dline, and the excuses and "dont crown em yet" starts.
More than happy to jump to conclusions and just bash the shit out of the front office before even seeing the product on the field. Product gets on the field, plays...maybe not well, but better than expected against a great Dline, and the excuses and "dont crown em yet" starts.
- Messages
- 2,189
- Reaction score
- 0
is your point that we should never question the decisions the front office makes. Still not sure what your point is here
- Messages
- 15,236
- Reaction score
- 2,486
Dude, you're talking about a one-game sample. Would you propose to a girl after one date? Well, maybe you would, if you're lonely and horny enough.
We won last night in spite of the line, not because of it. Half the time, Smith was being overpowered or spun like a top. The Romo pick happened because JPP bullrushed Cook. Romo was running for his life (again) and Murray wasn't exactly gliding through gaping holes. And don't get me started on the pre-snap penalties or clusterfuck on 4th and 1. Yes, we scored points, but we did so last year behind a similarly awful line. Delay the coronation.
Last edited:
Crazy how this is now an acceptable rebuttal.
When we were saying calm down wait to see the actual plan during preseason it was nothing but hand wringing and fuck jerry and our incompetent front office.
I'm all for waiting and seeing, but that wasn't the realists plan in the preseason. Now it is.
- Messages
- 15,236
- Reaction score
- 2,486
The "realist" point of view is that there's enough talent on this team to finish with a winning record despite mediocre players in the trenches. A winning team, but not a championship team. I saw nothing last night to change that. Even Jerry's fiercest critics didn't think we'd go 0-16.
- Messages
- 15,236
- Reaction score
- 2,486
I don't think he truly believes that Jerry or the scouts are "vindicated" after one game. I think he just enjoys winding people up. :whistle
I already explained what the realists were saying. And your milquetoast version isn't it. I can link if you want.
Suddenly they want to wait and see if the line can be mediocre. Two weeks ago snap judgements and Jerry/Front Office hate were all the rage. We'd "done absolutely nothing" to address our offensive line. What changed??????????
- Status