Quit beating around the bush then and prove it's true. Cythim tried to do it and failed. Until you have some substance showing the "reputation" has merit, I'm not going to give that tired line much credence.
It's an opinion. Isn't easy to prove an opinion as being "true."
If it were, then it'd be called a fact.
Even though it's a widely held opinion.
But I'll entertain you and point out why I believe it to be the case (although I'm sure I've already done so in this thread)...
2006 Bobbled snap @ Seattle.
2007 Int in the end zone vs Giants in divisional round.
2008 ****** pick 6 @ Steelers.
2008 Romo's three turnovers in a win and in @ Eagles.
2009 Romo's three fumbles and interception @ Minnesota.
My opinion, as stated time and time again, is that Romo is a very good QB. But I think he struggles mightily in hostile enviroments, when the game is on the line.
His history shows that. And that is his reputation.
Now... if you disagree with that, then so be it. I have no interest in trying to convince you otherwise. Likewise, there's nothing you're able to say that would change my perception. The only thing that would change my perception is Romo's play. Get us to the playoffs. Travel to New Orleans or Green Bay, and steal a victory.
It should be noted, I also think McNabb is a chocker for his post season woe's, despite him being a media darling, and always having to hear what a herowarriorleader he is.