Status
Not open for further replies.

NoDak

UDFA
Messages
2,633
Reaction score
0
WTF?

I step out to to the wellhead to check on my rig crew and Chi scores 10 points?
 

NoDak

UDFA
Messages
2,633
Reaction score
0
That's something I don't hear here in San Francisco.

It's bullshit. Almost 9:30 and I'm still at work.

Good thing I'm the f'n boss and only have to sit in my pickup dickin' around on the computer and watching the crew work.

BOOYAH!
 
Messages
46,859
Reaction score
5
Yeah, I know. I'm just kidding.

Oh. You caught me off guard because usually when you're kidding, it's at least remotely humorous.

SICK BURN!!!!!!!!!!!

Seriously though, props amigo for going to bat for me. Although I thought I did all that under the username HITR94, which was my admin account at the DCT, and I got along great with all the DCC'ers so they welcomed me at the DCC. They, of course, didn't realize my true identity. Not until I dropped that epic sick burn 4 lyfe dumbass line on them. I bet they were sooooo embarrassed. :errr

Likewise, I went to bat for you when you registered here. Sheik and Cr122 secretly hate you with a passion, although they'll both deny it.
 

Sheik

All-Pro
Messages
24,809
Reaction score
5
If I deny it, I prove him right.

I'm going to have to secretly hate you, Phil.
 

Bob Sacamano

All-Pro
Messages
26,436
Reaction score
3
I'm not gonna play these games. I asked a very pointed question about a comment in your post. If you want to have a conversation with me about it, and want to ask me questions, you have to answer the question I asked first.

*sigh* I can just do a quick search comparing Romo and Aaron Rodgers for the last seasons (20 games), and Romo has 1 less lost turnover (INT, lost fumble) in 10 less games played.

Romo: 12 INTs, 1 lost fumble

Rodgers: 13 INTs, 1 lost fumble

I consider them both to be very good QBs, while one is changing the possession due to a turnover a good amount more than the other on a per game basis.
 
Last edited:
Messages
10,636
Reaction score
0
That was a gander. C'mon, we all know Romo makes way too many mistakes.

Agreed.

But I dont think he/we are good enough to play more cautiously. We need points via the passing game. We have like 1 rushing TD in the past 12 games. And if we do ever get a rushing TD its a 1 yarder.

I dont think we need to replace him, I think we need to get some guards and centers and improve around him.

We had 13 pro-bowlers a few years ago and whos even left from that group? Romo, Witten, Ware, Rat, Newman, and McBriar. And only Witten, McBriar, and Ware are still that good. I think hes a 10-6 QB. A PS run with him is entirely possible.
 

Bob Sacamano

All-Pro
Messages
26,436
Reaction score
3
Agreed.

But I dont think he/we are good enough to play more cautiously. We need points via the passing game. We have like 1 rushing TD in the past 12 games. And if we do ever get a rushing TD its a 1 yarder.

I dont think we need to replace him, I think we need to get some guards and centers and improve around him.

We had 13 pro-bowlers a few years ago and whos even left from that group? Romo, Witten, Ware, Rat, Newman, and McBriar. And only Witten, McBriar, and Ware are still that good. I think hes a 10-6 QB. A PS run with him is entirely possible.

He had no choice but to proceed cautiously against Detroit and the Jets. Esp. when facing the Jet's defense. We were up by 2 or more TDs in both games.

I agree that we can win a lot of games with Romo, and have been doing so, but any farther is doubtful at this point unless he focuses an entire season with a good group around him.
 
Messages
10,636
Reaction score
0
He had no choice but to proceed cautiously against Detroit and the Jets. Esp. when facing the Jet's defense. We were up by 2 or more TDs in both games.

I agree that we can win a lot of games with Romo, and have been doing so, but any farther is doubtful at this point unless he focuses an entire season with a good group around him.


A slant is a dangerous play? Running it in from the 1 isnt usually too dangerous. Especially when the called fade probably wouldve been picked by Revis.

And In hindsight the Jets had that block in their back pocket so we were apparently always -7 at some point in the game.


My point is look at all the dudes we cut who are now out of the league. I think he raised a lot of them to that level and didnt have as much help as people think. Good QB's, desirable ones, can drag a team to the playoffs. They cant win 3/4 playoff games on their own though. Only great ones can do that.
 

Bob Sacamano

All-Pro
Messages
26,436
Reaction score
3
A slant is a dangerous play? Running it in from the 1 isnt usually too dangerous. Especially when the called fade probably wouldve been picked by Revis.

And In hindsight the Jets had that block in their back pocket so we were apparently always -7 at some point in the game.


My point is look at all the dudes we cut who are now out of the league. I think he raised a lot of them to that level and didnt have as much help as people think. Good QB's, desirable ones, can drag a team to the playoffs. They cant win 3/4 playoff games on their own though. Only great ones can do that.

A slant is generally never a dangerous pass, but when you trust a guy you've barely worked with to complete the route, then it becomes one. Of course hindsight is 20/20, but you get my drift. Romo forces things that sometimes he shouldn't which is the crux of all his turnovers. *minus the 50 passes Miles has tipped to the opponent*
 
Messages
10,636
Reaction score
0
I bet his ribs havent been well enough to enable him to throw it deep. They havent taken many shots

BTW WTH happened to all the fuggin screens that were supposed to be called this year?
 

Bob Sacamano

All-Pro
Messages
26,436
Reaction score
3
I bet his ribs havent been well enough to enable him to throw it deep. They havent taken many shots

BTW WTH happened to all the fuggin screens that were supposed to be called this year?

1. Felix's shoulder probably doesn't allow him to stretch for many of Romo's passes.

2. They don't trust DeMarco Murray yet.

3. Choice can only run forward.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom