Right, my hypothetical was more about the offense and QB style (like your team runs) than our team structure, which probably won't ever change.IMO the fatal flaw in bringing in a college coach as head coach of the Cowboys is that the Jones family would have an even firmer grasp on front office decisions. A college coach who lacks NFL gravitas and NFL credibility would result in Jerry being cast as the expert. The franchise would be justified in relying even more heavily on Jerry. After all, he's been doing NFL contracts, drafts, trades and GM'ing for years and the college coach hasn't done it all.
... and we all know that's not going to work.
The franchise would be better off with a Bill Cowher, even if Cowher isn't a better football coach than Kevin Sumlin/Art Briles. IMO, the single most important qualification for the next Head Coach is that he have the NFL gravitas to go toe-to-toe with Jerry.
Because if he can't do that, nothing else matters.
Besides, Briles just signed a 10 year contract with Baylor, so he is out of the conversation
Steve Alford signed a 10-year deal at New Mexico about a week before he signed with UCLA.
Yea, because picking OL in 2 of the last 3 years in the first round sold a TON of jerseysWho will sell more jerseys in Dallas? That will be the deciding factor.
Right, my hypothetical was more about the offense and QB style (like your team runs) than our team structure, which probably won't ever change.
Though I will say the model for my idea was someone like Chip Kelly. He was a college coach, but he had so much cred and was in such demand that he got to write his own ticket. In that case, I'm assuming he would have some say. If it were some unknown assistant from Oregon or Baylor, then yeah, he'd just be a puppet in front of Jerry's 18 wheeler.
If it absolutely has to be a huge name from the pro ranks, something like CMD's idea is probably the only one that would work, just because Gruden is still pretty young and seems open-minded enough to implement spread concepts. All the other guys I can think of are probably too old and set in their ways.
The thing about drafting O Linemen high is that they last a long time, assuming that aren't busts. So if we add Cyril Richradson this year and a young tackle to groom behind Free. Those two guys plus Frederick and Smith will alll be in their primes when we draft Romo's replacement, let's say Christian Hackenberg in the 2016 draft, when Romo will be 36 and 2016 is also the first chance where we can actually save cap room by cutting him.
To whoever said mettenberger over Manziel. lol
How many times will we push his money down the road? We may be unable to cut him in 2016 after all the restructuring that will have to take place between now and then just to field a team.
Speaking of wild ass ideas.... last time I visited my boyfriend I sat on the edge of the bed, and had him stand in front of me, bend over and pull his panties down while I ..... wait..... this is about football? Misleading thread title! :/
Yea, because picking OL in 2 of the last 3 years in the first round sold a TON of jerseys
Right, I'm very Pro-Romo so this isn't anything against him. More a hypothetical about going in a spread direction on offense and coaching-wise. I know a lot of people hate it, think it's gimmicky, "high school offense", etc.
Also, I don't mean running the QB every down. More spread concepts in the passing game like Kelly is doing with Foles. Though personally, I'd want someone who could at least run some, unlike Foles.