Discrimination doesn't just mean that you're denying Native Americans services. It refers to noting a distinction among a group of people.
They're using a derogatory name towards a race of people to market their team, sell merchandise, etc. How is that not exploitation?How is the name Redskins exploiting people? It's just a name and it's not a racial slur.
You're using a literal interpretation of the word as well...?That's a very literal interpretation. A more common definition is punishing or penalizing someone unfairly in some way. That certainly doesn't apply to Snyder's Redskins.
They're using a derogatory name towards a race of people to market their team, sell merchandise, etc. How is that not exploitation?
You're using a literal interpretation of the word as well...?
Snyder has stated he will “never” change the name.
There's a lot more than "white columnists" who think it's derogatory.I don't think it's derogatory and neither does the league. White columnists with nothing to write about in the offseason say it is, and they've apparently convinced you as well.
It's not my fault you assume incorrectly.When you use the word "discrimination" in a discussion about race or minorities, naturally I'm going to assume you mean discriminatory in a legal or negative sense.
There's a lot more than "white columnists" who think it's derogatory.
and at the idea that I'm easily convinced by the "white columnists." You're only on this side of the matter because your crushing on Midswat.
Who said I was offended? I'm 1/32 Native American, but I'm not easily offended. But I'm not surprised you don't know how to intelligently debate a topic without assuming I'm actually a person affected by the topic.That's not true at all. I'm just very anti-PC and agree with him on this.
Anyway, the name isn't changing so find something else to get offended about.
Someone had to take up the mantle in your absence...peplaw - board's new liberal bogeyman
Who said I was offended? I'm 1/32 Native American, but I'm not easily offended. But I'm not surprised you don't know how to intelligently debate a topic without assuming I'm actually a person affected by the topic.
I guess it all depends on the intent behind it huh? ****** can be used in a merely descriptive manner as well. You certainly can't claim that "Redskin" has never been used pejoratively.Because ****** (a pejorative) isn't remotely analogous to redskin (a description).
Then you assumed incorrectly. Appears to be a lot of that going on in here.Since you took the stance that you're against the name and called it discriminatory then I assumed you were offended by it.
I get it... You think you can belittle me by calling me an "attorney." See, I guess even words that aren't innately pejorative can be made to be so. Good one Jon.I should have known you would be playing word games. You're an attorney. That's how you and the other 15 million attorneys in this country make a living.
Two things I'm not personally affected by...And if you really think you're affected by the term "Redskins," I suggest you stop being such a pussy. That's ridiculous.