Whitlock slamming Parcells

[Bob Sacamano]

No, it actually wasn't.

p.s. lrn2comprehend

Annnnnd straight from the article:

However, The Big Tuna never coached in a Super Bowl without Belichick on his coaching staff.

Maybe you should hook up with Derek Zoolander...[video=youtube;7ffj8SHrbk0]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ffj8SHrbk0&feature=related[/video]

 

[lons]

Jerry without Jimmy/Jimmy's players

Go!

Jerry hasn't done anything without Jimmy and vice versa. I think we can all agree that they needed each other to keep the other in check or to at least poke each other to do better in a competition.

 

[marionbarberthe4th]

Parcells flips houses. No shit his record won't be as great as his legacy.

 

[marionbarberthe4th]

so romo didn't actually blow that game then

We would've taken a 2 point lead, and handed the Seahawks the ball with about 1:30 left on the clock, with the then hottest kicker in the league in Josh Brown (who had kicked I think four 50 yard plus game winning field goals for the Seahawks that year), coupled with our Zimmer-led defense who had a propensity for letting teams drive late in games, surrendering wins.


But if you want to play the what if game... so be it. Doesn't change what DID happen.

 

[Sheik]

Parcells flips houses. No shit his record won't be as great as his legacy.

cuz hez scared to build houses without BB.

 

[Midswat]

Annnnnd straight from the article:

However, The Big Tuna never coached in a Super Bowl without Belichick on his coaching staff.

Re-read SP's quote.

whitlocks point about parcells not winning without bellichick was specifically about super bowls,

Now re-read Whitlocks article.

Repeat that process as needed.

 

[Midswat]

Parcells flips houses. No shit his record won't be as great as his legacy.

Why does he flip houses?

Because he gets burnt out.

Most good coaches, if they go to a bad team, could turn it around.

Fortunately for owners, most good coaches can hang at the same job more than 3-4 years.

 

[Cr122]

Wade Phillips > Bill Parcells

No.....

 

[Bob Sacamano]

Re-read SP's quote.



Now re-read Whitlocks article.

Repeat that process as needed.

What are you disjointedly babbling on about?

Whitmore never mentioned or said anything about winning games or playoff games. He specifically mentioned Super Bowls. You lose.

 

[superpunk]

he did compare records without each other, but the whole article is just cherry picking stats and half-rationalizations. It's a retardedly simple analysis that was only done to support Whitlock's agenda, which was to rail against surly white men from Jersey which is probably why Midswat likes it so much.

 

[Midswat]

What are you disjointedly babbling on about?

Whitmore never mentioned or said anything about winning games or playoff games. He specifically mentioned Super Bowls. You lose.

lol

Oh, really?

In fact, Parcells coached seven seasons in the NFL without Belichick on the coaching staff — three in New England and four in Dallas. Parcells’ record in those seven seasons was 55-57 in the regular season and 0-3 in the postseason.

Belichick’s career record without Parcels is currently 165-95, 15-6 and three Super Bowl titles.

:roythehammer

 

[Bob Sacamano]

After he mentioned Super Bowls. Noone gives a shit about regular season wins.

 

[Rock Slamdance]

No.....

joke