Just cause he ain't a pretty QB doesn't mean they have no QB. I mean, are you just saying it's coincidental that they've gone 7-1 with Tebow starting?
That's the complete
opposite of what I'm saying.
My point (elaborated) is, either and/or:
A.) Tebow is single-handedly (despite lacking key Quarterbacking traits) willing his team to 6 straight victories (unlikely, but probably of late). While we have no such players.
B.) John Fox and his staff always have their team prepared to finish games (more than likely). While Garrett and the rest of his staff haven't theirs.
C.) A larger majority of their roster simply cares more than the majority of our roster (also likely).
Yes, you could pin our struggles as of late, all on the key roster deficiencies that we have, but the Packers ultimately won the Super Bowl last year with 12 rookies starting
and/or playing significant roles for them.
We have Dez Bryant who Jimmy Robinson can't get out his full potential while a young guy like Jordy Nelson in Green Bay is flourishing
without him. A player like Gerald Sensabaugh, despite his obvious size/speed combination, is a hesitant tackler. Newman, a 7 year vet, who is playing absolutely oblivious down the stretch. I could go on, and that despite these termed "excellent" coaches we are getting net loss results from them.
Hell, it's probably all A., B. and C.
