What will the Redskins record be in 2012


  • Total voters
    16

LAZARUS_LOGAN

Pro Bowler
Messages
14,639
Reaction score
207
@ New Orleans L
@ St. Louis W
Cincinnati W
@ Tampa Bay W
Atlanta L
Minnesota W
@ New York L
@ Pittsburgh L
Carolina W
Philadelphia L
@ Dallas L
New York W
Baltimore L
@ Cleveland W
@ Philadelphia L
Dallas W

That is 8 right there, if they beat the Eagles once that is 9. They could beat the Ravens, Atlanta at Home too or the Saints on the road, if the Payton lose effects them more than some think. I am worried Dallas is last in the division honestly.


St. Louis, Caronlina, Tampa Bay, and Cincninatti, are not given not at all. Especially with the Redskins' secondary. And seriously... the Cowboys play the Redskins better on the road. In fact, I see it mor elikely that they get swept by the division.

And what good does it do worrying like a bitch, honestly?

They're not winning 9 games with that secondary.
 
Last edited:
Messages
46,859
Reaction score
5
another who will be eating their words come January

10053352_this.gif
 

Sheik

All-Pro
Messages
24,809
Reaction score
5
Anyone happen to catch Patrice O'Neals last special? The one where his last joke was about ladies would love sex more if they had a money shot. Something about shooting out eggs.

Funny stuff.
 
Messages
5,432
Reaction score
0
@ New Orleans--LOSS
@ St. Louis--WIN (Ask Skin Fan, they normally always find a way to lose to the Rams but I'll get them the win)
Cincinnati--LOSS (The Best Young WR in the AFC Green will be licking his chops when he sees D.Hall)
@ Tampa Bay--WIN (The Skins could easily lose to this talent restocked Buc squad)
Atlanta--LOSS
Minnesota--WIN (They better win or they will be picking in the top 5/6 again...Oh they don't have a pick lol)
@ New York--LOSS (They aint sweeping the Giants 2 years in a row ....Bitch Please)
@ Pittsburgh--LOSS
Carolina--LOSS(They beat the crap outta the Skins last year when Cam was a rookie)
Philadelphia--LOSS
@ Dallas--LOSS
New York--WIN (I won't be surprised if the Giants turn the tables on them but I'll give them this one)
Baltimore--LOSS
@ Cleveland--WIN (I would actually bet on the Skins to win and cover but then again the Browns are @home)
@ Philadelphia--LOSS (Usually at least 2-NFC East opponents sweeps them, I'm saying only the Eagles this year)
Dallas--WIN (With our luck this loss will knock us out the playoff race)


Redskins 6-10
 

LAZARUS_LOGAN

Pro Bowler
Messages
14,639
Reaction score
207
@ New Orleans--LOSS
@ St. Louis--WIN (Ask Skin Fan, they normally always find a way to lose to the Rams but I'll get them the win)
Cincinnati--LOSS (The Best Young WR in the AFC Green will be licking his chops when he sees D.Hall)
@ Tampa Bay--WIN (The Skins could easily lose to this talent restocked Buc squad)
Atlanta--LOSS
Minnesota--WIN (They better win or they will be picking in the top 5/6 again...Oh they don't have a pick lol)
@ New York--LOSS (They aint sweeping the Giants 2 years in a row ....Bitch Please)
@ Pittsburgh--LOSS
Carolina--LOSS(They beat the crap outta the Skins last year when Cam was a rookie)
Philadelphia--LOSS
@ Dallas--LOSS
New York--WIN (I won't be surprised if the Giants turn the tables on them but I'll give them this one)
Baltimore--LOSS
@ Cleveland--WIN (I would actually bet on the Skins to win and cover but then again the Browns are @home)
@ Philadelphia--LOSS (Usually at least 2-NFC East opponents sweeps them, I'm saying only the Eagles this year)
Dallas--WIN (With our luck this loss will knock us out the playoff race)


Redskins 6-10

If we beat the Redskins in the first game, it's more likely that we'll sweep them. We play better at FedEx than at home against them. But you're a HATER BC.
 

Bob Sacamano

All-Pro
Messages
26,436
Reaction score
3
Anyone happen to catch Patrice O'Neals last special? The one where his last joke was about ladies would love sex more if they had a money shot. Something about shooting out eggs.

Funny stuff.

Yeah, it's called bukkake.
 
Messages
3,455
Reaction score
0
9-7 is realistic for the Skins. They play all their rivals tough. Could have easily beaten the Cowboys twice and beat the Giants. A Cowboy homer said they lost Landry, do you realize the guy was hurt most of the time? They have a young up and coming defense. They had alot of injuries last year. Revamped the WR core. Who knows, i wouldn’t count the Skins out. Plus the Giants will flop again after winning the SB.
 

LAZARUS_LOGAN

Pro Bowler
Messages
14,639
Reaction score
207
9-7 is realistic for the Skins. They play all their rivals tough.

How long have they been playing their rivals tough? Last year they played their rivals 'tough" and went 6-10, the year before that 4-12. And so forth. Many teams in the NFL play their rivals tough.



Could have easily beaten the Cowboys twice and beat the Giants.

Could have but didn't. They faced off against the Cowboys the first game with Romo having broken ribs---I guess you ignore that tidbit. I guess according to your dumbass that if Romo were 100% healthy, that the Redskins would have beaten us... right? Also Miles Austin didn't play in either game against the Redskins, now let's suppose that he did play... I imagine the Redskins would have beaten us, correct? And yes they beat the Giants, sorry but bad teams sometimes beat good teams.

And should I go into the "could haves' with the Cowboys?


A Cowboy homer said they lost Landry, do you realize the guy was hurt most of the time?

And maybe that's why they might have went 5-11?? Uh... duh.


They have a young up and coming defense.

The Redskins average age on defense is 30 years old, compared to the Cowboys of 27.4


They had alot of injuries last year.


They had no more than anyone else. We had our share of injuries. I guess Murray being injured wasn't a factor for the Cowboys, right and I'm just being a homer? I guess Romo playing iwth his injury almost all yea was not a factor. I guess Miles Austin ebing injured was not a factor. What injuries did the Redskins have that were anymore significant than the Cowboys?


Revamped the WR core.

The question is revamped with what? They got rid of their leading WR in Gaffney.


Who knows, i wouldn’t count the Skins out. Plus the Giants will flop again after winning the SB.


You ask as to "who knows" but yet you yap on like you do know. Now you're saying don't count out the Redskins? So let me get this straight. You are COUNTING OUT the Super Bowl Champions---the team that won it twice in 5 years, but then you tell us not to count out a 5-11 team, that was 6-10 the year before, and 4-12 the year before that? Brilliant!

Man just go back to selling those embroidered T-shirts, and leave serious football alone to us... "homers".
 
Messages
3,455
Reaction score
0
How long have they been playing their rivals tough? Last year they played their rivals 'tough" and went 6-10, the year before that 4-12. And so forth. Many teams in the NFL play their rivals tough.

Ok, which supports my point that you shouldn’t take them lightly.

The Redskins average age on defense is 30 years old, compared to the Cowboys of 27.4

I was speaking mostly about their young linebackers and d-lineman. Besides, final rosters aren’t set to be able to use average per age as a reference.

They had no more than anyone else. We had our share of injuries. I guess Murray being injured wasn't a factor for the Cowboys, right and I'm just being a homer? I guess Romo playing iwth his injury almost all yea was not a factor. I guess Miles Austin ebing injured was not a factor. What injuries did the Redskins have that were anymore significant than the Cowboys?

WTF? You are having an argument with yourself, lol. I never mentioned the Cowboys and their injuries.

The question is revamped with what? They got rid of their leading WR in Gaffney.

Gaffney was their leading receiver. Let that sink in. They are obviously improved at that position. At least on paper.

You ask as to "who knows" but yet you yap on like you do know. Now you're saying don't count out the Redskins? So let me get this straight. You are COUNTING OUT the Super Bowl Champions---the team that won it twice in 5 years, but then you tell us not to count out a 5-11 team, that was 6-10 the year before, and 4-12 the year before that? Brilliant!

I wouldn’t count out the Champs or any NFC East teams. I do think they have shown in the past to have a Super Bowl let down the next year. Hopefully they will again.

Man just go back to selling those embroidered T-shirts, and leave serious football alone to us... "homers".

:laz
 

LAZARUS_LOGAN

Pro Bowler
Messages
14,639
Reaction score
207
Ok, which supports my point that you shouldn’t take them lightly.

It does? And your point about dismissing the Giants? You got it ass backwards. It's not that anybody is taking them lightly, we just are not slurping their cocks like you.



I was speaking mostly about their young linebackers and d-lineman. Besides, final rosters aren’t set to be able to use average per age as a reference.

I went by their starters for average age.



WTF? You are having an argument with yourself, lol. I never mentioned the Cowboys and their injuries.

I know you didn't, I did. You want to use injuries as an excuse for the Redskins sucking, but they had no more injuries than the other division teams. I mean I don't think any team had as many injuries as the Giants.



affney was their leading receiver. Let that sink in. They are obviously improved at that position. At least on paper.

Well the Patriots picked up Gaffney. How have they improved? Garcon? Hmmm.. 40% of his yards came in garbage time when the game was out of reach for the Colts. And does he have a Reggie Wayne playing along side of him with the Redskins? And you talk about how the Redskins improved, but guess what... so has every other team, including ours, despite you not believing it.



wouldn’t count out the Champs or any NFC East teams. I do think they have shown in the past to have a Super Bowl let down the next year. Hopefully they will again.

But you did count them out until I busted you on it. And once again you're bing hypocritical. If you're going by history that the Giants in the past have had Super Bowl let down the following year, then why do you have a hard time with the Redskins finishing under .500, when they've done that for 3 consecutive years? Make up your mind.




Black Snake Moan... I bet your wife craves it when you out selling those T-shirts.
 
Messages
3,455
Reaction score
0
It does? And your point about dismissing the Giants? You got it ass backwards. It's not that anybody is taking them lightly, we just are not slurping their cocks like you.

I love Redskin cock. Damnit you got me!

I went by their starters for average age.

Link?

I know you didn't, I did. You want to use injuries as an excuse for the Redskins sucking, but they had no more injuries than the other division teams. I mean I don't think any team had as many injuries as the Giants.

Injuries are a good excuse. Some teams can over come them, some can’t. Giants obviously could. I predicted a 9-7 record for the Skins that is slightly above average. Let’s not go over board here.

Well the Patriots picked up Gaffney. How have they improved? Garcon? Hmmm.. 40% of his yards came in garbage time when the game was out of reach for the Colts. And does he have a Reggie Wayne playing along side of him with the Redskins? And you talk about how the Redskins improved, but guess what... so has every other team, including ours, despite you not believing it.

Huh? When did i say i didn’t think the Cowboys have improved?

But you did count them out until I busted you on it. And once again you're bing hypocritical. If you're going by history that the Giants in the past have had Super Bowl let down the following year, then why do you have a hard time with the Redskins finishing under .500, when they've done that for 3 consecutive years? Make up your mind.

Because i think they are due for a decent season, lol. What is so wrong with that?

Black Snake Moan... I bet your wife craves it when you out selling those T-shirts.

My wife craves cock. But just for the record, i don’t go out selling t-shirts. I do graphic design and i tattoo part time. I can do custom heat transfer t-shirts in house but people come to me. I don’t embroider either. Get your facts straight muther fucker, lol
 

LAZARUS_LOGAN

Pro Bowler
Messages
14,639
Reaction score
207

Go to NFL.COM and look up the age of the starters, and then get somebody to add them up, and divide the number for you.



Injuries are a good excuse. Some teams can over come them, some can’t. Giants obviously could. I predicted a 9-7 record for the Skins that is slightly above average. Let’s not go over board here.

Predicting a 5-11 team in the NFC East of going 9-7 is as overboard as it gets. Now I've asked you, what significant inuures did the Redskins have, and yet you still haven't addressed that. Maybe because you don't have a clue as to what youa re talking about.



Huh? When did i say i didn’t think the Cowboys have improved?

Didn't you point out that the Redskins "could have beaten us easily" last year, and now they have a revamped WR corp, blah blah blah, and that is what you base them going 9-7 this upcoming season. The flaw in that is that they won't be facing the same Cowboys' team.

So do you think all the NFC East teams will finish 9-7 and better?

They had a LAST PLACE SCHEDULE last year. And could only net 5 wins.



Because i think they are due for a decent season, lol. What is so wrong with that?

Well hey! There you have it. The Redskins are going to go 9-7 because they're due for a decent seasons. Nevermind if they just happen to be the least most talented team in the division. They're just due! Brilliant football analysis.



My wife craves cock. But just for the record, i don’t go out selling t-shirts. I do graphic design and i tattoo part time. I can do custom heat transfer t-shirts in house but people come to me. I don’t embroider either. Get your facts straight muther fucker, lol


A graphic artist... translation: while my wife goes out to support me and my kids, I sit at home and draw and visit chat rooms. LOL.
 
Top Bottom