Messages
8,660
Reaction score
0
That bolded part is important. A lot of legal experts have said Martin's autopsy would prove if there was any altercation between the two. I'd guess something like this is what they're talking about.
I didn't think there was a debate over whether there was an altercation.
 
Messages
8,660
Reaction score
0
Physical altercation. As in, did Martin strike Zimmerman.

Save your semantics for court, counselor.
It's not semantics. That's what I meant. I thought there were third-party witnesses who said there was a physical altercation?

I didn't think that was disputed.
 

SixisBetter

Anywhere on the line.
Messages
4,211
Reaction score
370
George Zimmerman’s injuries:

* Broken nose

* Two black eyes

* Two cuts to the back of the head

* Back pain

* Bruised upper lip

If that's not reason enough to kill a guy,I don't know what is.
 

NoDak

UDFA
Messages
2,633
Reaction score
0
It's not semantics. That's what I meant. I thought there were third-party witnesses who said there was a physical altercation?

I didn't think that was disputed.

Reread this thread. You'll find plenty of it.
 
Messages
8,660
Reaction score
0
If that's not reason enough to kill a guy,I don't know what is.
Depends on the facts. If you were an innocent person who was attacked, then probably. If you were following someone after profiling them and putting them in fear for their life, then probably not.
 

Jon88

Pro Bowler
Messages
19,523
Reaction score
0
Depends on the facts. If you were an innocent person who was attacked, then probably. If you were following someone after profiling them and putting them in fear for their life, then probably not.

Oh yeah Trayvon was in fear of his life. He didn't run. He did what any thug/punk would do and beat him up.

Too bad the guy had a gun.
 

NoDak

UDFA
Messages
2,633
Reaction score
0
You can't prove your point so make it about me having a need to argue.

Thats some weak shit NoDak.
I can prove plenty. But feel no need to prove it to you.

It's what you do. You pick the contrarian side to shit. No matter the subject. If everyone was in agreement that water was wet, you'd invent some reason to argue the other side.

So argue on. More power to you. Just don't expect me to play your stupid games.
 
Messages
8,660
Reaction score
0
Oh yeah Trayvon was in fear of his life. He didn't run. He did what any thug/punk would do and beat him up.

Too bad the guy had a gun.
He called his girlfriend and told her that someone was following him. He wouldn't do that if he wasn't fearful. He tried to get away from Zimmerman. He wouldn't do that if he wasn't fearful. Do you know that he didn't run? His girlfriend told him to run and he said he wasn't going to run. Doesn't mean he didn't run. And running isn't required to show fear. The rest of this stuff does that.
 

jiggyfly

In the Rotation
Messages
712
Reaction score
0
I can prove plenty. But feel no need to prove it to you.

It's what you do. You pick the contrarian side to shit. No matter the subject. If everyone was in agreement that water was wet, you'd invent some reason to argue the other side.

So argue on. More power to you. Just don't expect me to play your stupid games.

You got me, the only reason I have been in this thread is because I want to be contrarian. lol

Heaven forbid anybody have a different opinion or least they be accused of playing games and this from a guy who has admitted to just stirring shit up because he was bored.
 

Jon88

Pro Bowler
Messages
19,523
Reaction score
0
He called his girlfriend and told her that someone was following him. He wouldn't do that if he wasn't fearful. He tried to get away from Zimmerman. He wouldn't do that if he wasn't fearful. Do you know that he didn't run? His girlfriend told him to run and he said he wasn't going to run. Doesn't mean he didn't run. And running isn't required to show fear. The rest of this stuff does that.

What's his girlfriend going to do? Why didn't he try explaining what he was doing? If he was scared then maybe he was doing something wrong. Still not a reason to beat someone up. You could get shot, you know.
 

jiggyfly

In the Rotation
Messages
712
Reaction score
0
What's his girlfriend going to do? Why didn't he try explaining what he was doing? If he was scared then maybe he was doing something wrong. Still not a reason to beat someone up. You could get shot, you know.

So in your mind its not possible that Zimmerman started the altercation and then got his ass beat?

In your mind Martin had no right to "stand his ground" but Zimmerman does, why is that?
 
Messages
46,859
Reaction score
5
So in your mind its not possible that Zimmerman started the altercation and then got his ass beat?


No, that actually makes perfect sense. Zimmerman, who up until that point had been communicating with authorities, provided his location, and made plans to meet officers upon their arrival... decided to kick a little ass until the cops came.

:sbk92


In your mind Martin had no right to "stand his ground" but Zimmerman does, why is that?

You lose the right to stand your ground when you initiate the physical confrontation - which Martin obviously did.

Also, I'm changing your username to Jiggyfly. The name BigBoi is almost as obnoxious as your posting style.
 

Jon88

Pro Bowler
Messages
19,523
Reaction score
0
So in your mind its not possible that Zimmerman started the altercation and then got his ass beat?

In your mind Martin had no right to "stand his ground" but Zimmerman does, why is that?


What made him need to stand his ground if he was simply asked a question about what he was doing? That's no reason to start swinging on someone and it never will be.
 
Top Bottom