No. Different circumstances. You are assuming that we would have played the Redskins the same way. You just cannot change one variable of an entire scenario. Fact is, Manning had a better Oline with the Colts.
Yet fans do it all the time.
OMG! COSTA SUCKS! IF WE HAD BETTER CENTER WE PLAY BETTER WIN MOAR GAME!!!
but but but... if we had a better center, the opponent might've played us different.
OMG! NEWMAN SUCKS! IF WE HAD BETTER CORNER WE PLAYE BETTER WIN MOAR GAME!!!
Happens all the time in sports.
Naturally, if you change one variable, there is an entire sequence of events that would change. That goes without saying.
But based on what we saw... that being, the Redskins winning 6 games, and their most obvious glaring weakness being quarterback... and in a division where the champ was 9-7.... then it's not out of the question to suggest that had the Redskins had quality quarterback, then they very well could've won the division.
Does that make sense?
Or are you going to do the "they won games cuz lucky" and "serviceable my ass! horrid receivers catch 70 passes and 950 yards all the time in the NFL" routine as well?