This is the most underwhelming case for they have weapons that I have ever seen. It's a bunch of bums and starters who wouldn't even get on other teams PS's. There's noone even in Wayne/Clark/Garcon's hemisphere.
- Thread starter Bonecrusher#31
- Start date
This is the most underwhelming case for they have weapons that I have ever seen. It's a bunch of bums and starters who wouldn't even get on other teams PS's. There's noone even in Wayne/Clark/Garcon's hemisphere.
Gaffneys been in the league a while. Serviceable. Hell, he looked very good against us.
Hankerson was a well regarded prospect in the past draft.
And like I said, the free agent WR corps is impressive, and you can have your virtual pick of the litter at #6.
All that notwithstanding, I'd absolutely make this move if Peyton was healthy and I was the Redskins GM.
I disagree.
They would've beaten us twice, so that's 8-8 right there.
I'm sure a quality QB could've squeezed another win somewhere.
You're comparing a cornerbacks impact on a team to that of QB?
maybe with a corner or safety we hold on to beat Detroit instead of watching Barry Church and co. fall at CJ's feet, maybe we also beat New England and New York the first time, making our week 17 matchup meaningless. Then we go on an epic run as SB champions.
Makes alot more sense than your "the talentless Redskins are a QB away from being contenders." Jabar Gaffney as "serviceable"? Gimme a break.
Makes alot more sense than your "the talentless Redskins are a QB away from being contenders." Jabar Gaffney as "serviceable"? Gimme a break.
I've stated in a previous thread that yeah, had we signed Nmandi, I think we would've won the division.
In your opinion. Like I said, agree to disagree.
The "no talent hack" Redskins won 6 games this year - with horrid QB play.
With that horrid QB play, they nearly beat us twice. We won because of a miraculous 3rd and 23 conversion in one game, and a missed Redskins field goal in overtime in the second game.
Grossman was benched because of a four interception outing vs the Eagles. Despite those four picks, they only lost by 7.
They lost the following three games Beck started largely because of Beck's complete and utter incompetance.
QB was far and away the Redskins most glaring need.
They had a solid defense. And the run game was strong despite the lack of a threat in the pass game.
If the notion that them having a quality starting QB from contending for the NFC East in a year when the winner was a mere 9-7, and the Eagles were in it until week 15 despite a what, 4-8 start to the season.... if that notion is too far-fetched for you, then I don't know what to tell you.
Again, agree to disagree.
It's pretty crazy how bad I'm carving you up here.
LAZARUS_LOGAN
Pro Bowler
- Messages
- 14,639
- Reaction score
- 207
They have a good TE---singular, not plural. Davis is a stud. Cooley is done. Word is, that he's on his way out.
If they are acquiring Manning, they are not going to have the #6 pick. Because that is what it would probably take. Considering what the Raiders gave up for Palmer.