NoDak

UDFA
Messages
2,633
Reaction score
0
Well, when you bold something, and then the first word you post is "plenty" sure does look like it.


Go back and read your incoherent ramblings. Then maybe you'll understand where it could look like that is exactly what you're saying. And please. Continue with your prepubescent attempts at insults. They make you look even more retarded than the general ideas of your posts. Great comedy. lol
 

Bob Sacamano

All-Pro
Messages
26,436
Reaction score
3
How can you appreciate it when you haven't watched him? You're full of shit. Nobody is ignoring it. Going with Kowalski would not be ignoring the position or winging it, the guy has proven himself more than capable thus far---enough to warrant the start, and where we can focus on other positions. You can be snide all you want about the 144 snaps. Fact is... because of those 144 snaps that he done well with, he deserves more.

Right. Kowalski deserves the opportunity...

to compete for the starting C position with whomever we may bring in or whomever is already on the roster, minus Costa. The only thing his performance last year guarantees is that he's not going to get shown the door along with Costa.

Lazarus Logan said:
Not sure where you are getting your claim that they are heavily scouted or that Guard is any less heavily scouted.

Only a fool would take Konz over DeCastro, which is what you are advocating.

You really have to stop putting words in people's mouths. I never said directly or indirectly that I would choose Konz over DeCastro.

I'd probably choose Konz over Kowalski though.
 
Last edited:

LAZARUS_LOGAN

Pro Bowler
Messages
14,639
Reaction score
207
You really have to stop putting words in people's mouths. I never said directly or indirectly that I would choose Konz over DeCastro.

I'd probably choose Konz over Kowalski though.


You're advocating drafting Konz, you said it's a priority. Or do you think the Cowboys will be able to draft both?
 
Top Bottom