yimyammer

Pro Bowler
Messages
10,167
Reaction score
4,038
Where did I ever say that? (bolded part). I'm a HUGE proponent of the death penalty, we should be using it far more than we do and if we did, crime would greatly be curtailed.

Dont patronize me with bullshit like what's going on in England and what they are locking people up for and somehow try to make a correlation with what this batshit crazy woman just said. A massive company's CEO was just murdered in the streets and wrote the same words on shell casings that she regurgitated and then said "you're next", that's a far cry from some Joe Blow guy saying "this government sux because they import too many terrorists". One is free speech, the other is a legitimate THREAT and was on the tails of something that literally JUST HAPPENED.

I know you're smarter than this. I'm a 100% free speech guy, telling somebody on a recorded line that "you're next" after another health company's CEO was just murdered is NOT a free speech issue. The woman is either stupid as hell or fucking nuts, and in todays day and age you have to take this stuff seriously.

here's what you said in post #3,132:

Scum sucking traitors, all of them.

Of course they want the pardon, behind the scenes I am sure him, Cheney, Peolosi, Schiff, Fauci and dozens others are BEGGING for a parson. They all know they are guilty of sin of treason and in Fauci's case, also crimes against humanity. Every one of them 100% deserve the death penalty.

I'm not saying you should be locked up and I know what you're saying when you made this comment (the death penalty implies due process, etc) but you know damn well there are people that would make a similar argument you're making against this woman toward you in order to create a power structure to punish people for what they say

:icon-lol: settle down there hombre, I'm not trying to patronize you (maybe I did accidentally) and I'm not saying I'm right on this, I just lean hard toward free speech because most people are too damn sensitive about words and will use a precedent like this to try and lock people up for "misgendering", "misinformation", etc. Just look at what the lunkheads at your favorite cowboy forum do with their power

People talk a lot of shit, you do it all the time and you have the right to do so without fear of being locked up. I think this lady was just upset and decided to talk shit because she was pissed off, kind of like we've heard people do when they say "I hope you die!" etc in a state of rage. Her statement could easily be her talking shit in a rage implying its treatment like she's getting that leads people to do what Luigi did thus "you're next" but in no way meant she was going to do actually anything.

I agree the times and recent murder demand vigilance but lets not accidentally do more harm than good in our haste to try and prevent the next Luigi so thats where I'm coming from. You know damn well the leftist loons would love to have incarceration for speech they find unacceptable in their arsenal and I dont want anyone to ever have that, regardless of party.

Guess I'm jaded from always being told "sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me"

The people I find most threatening are the ones you never hear a peep from until its too late

I admit I'm on the extreme absolute end of free speech but am open to hearing ideas of how best to handle situations like this.

This example in GB strikes me as an over-reach given I've been called racist for merely not accepting a view expressed by a minority:

Man convicted of intending to stir up racial hatred after posting online

06 August 2024
A man who posted messages on Facebook about attacking a hotel where asylum seekers were housed has been convicted of using threatening words or behaviour to stir up racial hatred.

Jordan Parlour, 28, made the online comments advocating an attack on a hotel in Leeds, and the posts were reported to police.

The hotel manager put the building into lockdown on Saturday, 3 August due to the disorder in Leeds, and at least one window was broken after stones were thrown over the weekend.

There was no evidence that Parlour attended the hotel.

The Attorney General provided consent today to prosecute in accordance with Section 27 of the Public Order Act 1986.

This is the first conviction for posting online in relation to the public disorder.

Parlour pleaded guilty at Leeds Magistrates’ Court today and was remanded in custody ahead of his sentence at Leeds Crown Court on Friday, 9 August.

Nick Price, Director of Legal Services at the Crown Prosecution Service, said:"I want to be absolutely clear, anyone involved in inciting this thuggish behaviour will face severe consequences.

"Parlour advocated violence through his online posts and risked the safety of those staying at the hotel.

"The CPS will continue to act swiftly and robustly regarding these cases and ensure those responsible for such deplorable criminality are brought to justice."
 

yimyammer

Pro Bowler
Messages
10,167
Reaction score
4,038
That lady could have saved a lot of time, money and hassle if she had simply bit her tongue, hung up and then called these guys:

 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
58,539
Reaction score
9,040
They are going full blown fucktard to end the worst 4 yrs in our country's history.

Earlier today Biden signed some kind of contract agreement to allow all those federal losers to continue working from home for years to come.

 

Creeper

UDFA
Messages
1,887
Reaction score
2,275
OK assholes...you people are ruining the earth with your needless breathing....we are going to do our part here at DCU, and moving forward you are hereby ordered to hold your breath for 30 seconds at a time when posting. You can do this mandatory 30 seconds either at the beginning or end of your posting session, but the science says you are fucking everything up with your excessive breathing, and we have to follow the science.

Do your part and "take a breather from breathing!!!!!!!!!!!"



I recommend that half of us stop breathing to solve the problem. I think Democrats who are especially worried about Global Warming should go first.
 

Creeper

UDFA
Messages
1,887
Reaction score
2,275
I live in Northern NJ and I have yet to see a drone flying over my area. Of course I am not outside looking for them all day but I do walk my dogs 3 times a day so I am probably out more than most people this time of year.

I have seen the occasional helicopter and private small plane but no drones.

My sister lives in South Jersey and she says she sees them all the time. She lives near the NJ Turnpike which runs the length of NJ North-South. It is a major highway, RT 95, running up and down the east coast. If I was worried about the transportation of WMDs to NYC or DC, I would be surveilling the NJ Turnpike constantly.

Not saying the reports of a search for a dirty bomb, or nuclear material that was smuggled into the country is true, but it is the most plausible explanation for all these drones I have heard and why the US government will not shoot one down and also why they are not telling us the truth. They are concerned about a panic evacuation. This is believable because Democrats are in charge and they think we are all stupid.
 

yimyammer

Pro Bowler
Messages
10,167
Reaction score
4,038
I live in Northern NJ and I have yet to see a drone flying over my area. Of course I am not outside looking for them all day but I do walk my dogs 3 times a day so I am probably out more than most people this time of year.

I have seen the occasional helicopter and private small plane but no drones.

My sister lives in South Jersey and she says she sees them all the time. She lives near the NJ Turnpike which runs the length of NJ North-South. It is a major highway, RT 95, running up and down the east coast. If I was worried about the transportation of WMDs to NYC or DC, I would be surveilling the NJ Turnpike constantly.

Not saying the reports of a search for a dirty bomb, or nuclear material that was smuggled into the country is true, but it is the most plausible explanation for all these drones I have heard and why the US government will not shoot one down and also why they are not telling us the truth. They are concerned about a panic evacuation. This is believable because Democrats are in charge and they think we are all stupid.

if they are searching for a dirty bomb, it just shows how dumb the current administration is, they could have come outing front of the news and announced a cover story for why there will be drones like testing them for terrain mapping, etc, etc
 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
58,539
Reaction score
9,040
if they are searching for a dirty bomb, it just shows how dumb the current administration is, they could have come outing front of the news and announced a cover story for why there will be drones like testing them for terrain mapping, etc, etc
Now the FBI is out there threatening people who shoot them down (guns or lasers)

If you want to see what a complete made up bullshit story is, go read about it. They are telling people "most of these are manned planes" as if people are REALLY this stupid. Almost any fucking idiot with a functioning set of eye balls and ears can tell the difference between a low flying drone and a manned jet/helicopter. Further, many of the witnesses to these drones are law enforcement, military or other aviation experts who all know the fucking difference for certain.

They apparently had a classified briefing on this yesterday and at least one member who spoke afterward said most of these are likely Chinese spy drones. This on the heels of Chinese spy ballons that the Biden people let fly all over our country unfettered and then didnt shoot them down until AFTER they moved over the entire country and out into the Atlantic.

This is the most corrupt and inept piece of shit government and administration we have ever had.
 

yimyammer

Pro Bowler
Messages
10,167
Reaction score
4,038
These fucking treasonous bastards. They've all contributed to ruining the country for years so what do they do?

They vote themselves a FORTY PERCENT (40%) raise??????? WTF



IMO, all bills should be single issue and riders, attachments, etc should be outlawed
 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
58,539
Reaction score
9,040
I would encourage all 8 of our members to phone his/her US Rep TODAY. It takes less than 5 mins. Make sure they know you don't support this fucking treacherous, treasonous piece of shit bill that none of them bothered to read.

I called mine (Rep Andre Clyde) and was told he was a firm no. Elon and Vivek are both asking people to flood these offices with calls.

Easy to find out who yours is (if you dont know) and their contact info is also shared here.

 
  • Like
Reactions: VTA

yimyammer

Pro Bowler
Messages
10,167
Reaction score
4,038
I would encourage all 8 of our members to phone his/her US Rep TODAY. It takes less than 5 mins. Make sure they know you don't support this fucking treacherous, treasonous piece of shit bill that none of them bothered to read.

I called mine (Rep Andre Clyde) and was told he was a firm no. Elon and Vivek are both asking people to flood these offices with calls.

Easy to find out who yours is (if you dont know) and their contact info is also shared here.


Is a phone call more effective than an email?

What does CR stand for? Is this an actual bill or some other horseshit scheme they've come up with to spend money?
 

yimyammer

Pro Bowler
Messages
10,167
Reaction score
4,038
here's what you said in post #3,132:



I'm not saying you should be locked up and I know what you're saying when you made this comment (the death penalty implies due process, etc) but you know damn well there are people that would make a similar argument you're making against this woman toward you in order to create a power structure to punish people for what they say

:icon-lol: settle down there hombre, I'm not trying to patronize you (maybe I did accidentally) and I'm not saying I'm right on this, I just lean hard toward free speech because most people are too damn sensitive about words and will use a precedent like this to try and lock people up for "misgendering", "misinformation", etc. Just look at what the lunkheads at your favorite cowboy forum do with their power

People talk a lot of shit, you do it all the time and you have the right to do so without fear of being locked up. I think this lady was just upset and decided to talk shit because she was pissed off, kind of like we've heard people do when they say "I hope you die!" etc in a state of rage. Her statement could easily be her talking shit in a rage implying its treatment like she's getting that leads people to do what Luigi did thus "you're next" but in no way meant she was going to do actually anything.

I agree the times and recent murder demand vigilance but lets not accidentally do more harm than good in our haste to try and prevent the next Luigi so thats where I'm coming from. You know damn well the leftist loons would love to have incarceration for speech they find unacceptable in their arsenal and I dont want anyone to ever have that, regardless of party.

Guess I'm jaded from always being told "sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me"

The people I find most threatening are the ones you never hear a peep from until its too late

I admit I'm on the extreme absolute end of free speech but am open to hearing ideas of how best to handle situations like this.

This example in GB strikes me as an over-reach given I've been called racist for merely not accepting a view expressed by a minority:
More crap from Britain:

 
Top Bottom