Some relic named Pearson predicts Cowboys to the Super Bowl

[LAZARUS_LOGAN]

Skill position wise we definitely have enough talent to win offensively. There is that pesky OL to think about though.

And HC.

 

[LAZARUS_LOGAN]

"improvements on defense"? Durant and Allen will put us over the top or something? very unlike him to homer out like this.

As usual, you don't have a fucking clue as to what you are talking about. Durant is a solid player, and a vet.

 

[LAZARUS_LOGAN]

The improvements will be about adding Kiffin and Marinelli. I feel good about our DEs, CBs, and LBs, but we have massive question marks at DT and S. Positions we continually do not seem to value.

Question marks with the DT? I'm more than fine with Hatcher and Rat. And I think the depth behind DTs is better than that behind the DEs.

 

[LAZARUS_LOGAN]

Livings is garbage. But Bernadeau played better as the year went on.

Just have to hope that Leary is good enough to start over one of them.

 

[LAZARUS_LOGAN]

That might be the dumbest post I've ever seen by you, bbgun.

Indeed. And that's saying quite a bit.

 

[carphalen5150]

One of the biggest problems is we never mention Arkin as a solution to the line issues.

 

[LAZARUS_LOGAN]

what's dumb about "brains and coaching" not being enough? we need talent more than we need Marinelli.

This team was talented enough to still compete for the division last year, despite the lack of brains and coaching.

 

[LAZARUS_LOGAN]

One of the biggest problems is we never mention Arkin as a solution to the line issues.

It was a wasted pick. much like Wilber.

 

[bbgun]

As usual, you don't have a fucking clue as to what you are talking about. Durant is a solid player, and a vet.

Big deal. We pick up a veteran linebacker every other year and it never makes a significant difference. God help us if you're counting on Detroit's castoffs.

 

[bbgun]

This team was talented enough to still compete for the division last year, despite the lack of brains and coaching.

The division is their ceiling. We're talking about Drew Pearson and his Super Bowl prediction.

 

[carphalen5150]

It was a wasted pick. much like Wilber.

I don't know if I am ready to give up on Wilber yet, but Arkin certainly was a waste.

 

[Midswat]

Just look at how we've played against recent SB winners/competitors....

No one blows us out. And we either beat, or almost beat them all.

When healthy, there's not a lot of teams that are head and shoulders better than us, bbgun.

 

[LAZARUS_LOGAN]

I don't know if I am ready to give up on Wilber yet, but Arkin certainly was a waste.

I'd rather see Albright backing Ware. But I guess we will see.

 

[bbgun]

Meh. "We played 'em close!" is loser talk. The fact that we lost three Super Bowls in the 1970s by a total of 11 points does not make me feel any better.

 

[carphalen5150]

I think that we have a chance to make a run because our division might be the worst in the NFC. The West and South are better...and it is probably a pick'em between the North and the East. So we get 6 games against lesser competion.

 

[carphalen5150]

I'd rather see Albright backing Ware. But I guess we will see.

I'd like to see Albright stay at LB altogether.

 

[Midswat]

I'm simply illustrating to you that we have the talent to compete with anyone in the league.

 

[cmd34(work)]

I'd like to see Albright stay at LB altogether.

why? Tampa 2 LB's are asked to cover a lot of ground and fly to screens and passes to the flats. Not exactly Albright's strength.

 

[Midswat]

You underestimate Albrights athleticism.

 

[carphalen5150]

why? Tampa 2 LB's are asked to cover a lot of ground and fly to screens and passes to the flats. Not exactly Albright's strength.

He impressed me last year when given a chance to make some plays. I just know I'd rather have him at LB than DE.