If it makes sense to you, I have to assume you don't know what the F you're talking about.
I don't care what we ended up with in trades after. I only care that they let 2 starting caliber players leave for a pittance. We could have gotten more.
If I trade Jay Ratliff for a 6th round pick and then end up using that 6th on a future hall of famer, did I make a good trade?
The answer is no. You could have, and should have gotten more for the player. Not that Ayodele or Fasano are as good as Ratliff, but that's besides the point. We gave away starters for relatively nothing because we have a joke oil salesman pretending he's an NFL GM.
the reality of the trade was that it was fasano for the 1st pick of the 4th round and the first pick of sunday morning. number 100. That is a valuable pick.
ayodele struggled through the whole season and the team had already replaced him with zach thomas in free agency and had burnett for the nickel and dime packages.
There were multiple reports of why the team soured on fasano, I dont know which one is true, he was an injury proned player or poor special teams player....either way they felt he didnt fit. I imagine this was endorsed by john and jason garrett and they were driving the bus. Its unreasonable to expect to get much back for a number 2 tight end who just had shoulder surgery.
The team did well with the pick they got back and also added zach thomas. I like fasano and would not have traded him and disliked the trade on that friday night when it was announced. But in retrospect they did well that weekend with what they turned that pick into. Its too bad jason williams was so poor. If he had worked out it would have turned out because of that trade we would have had scandrick, choice, williams and then ironically tucker.