Common homer behavior.
Saying we need to run the ball translates to we want to run the ball 100% of the time.
Saying we need to sign more free agents translates to we want to throw millions of dollars at every free agent out there.
You try to debate your side and you get accused of extremist thinking.
With a big lead, let's just run the ball more than we are now. Is that too radical an idea?
You don't win in the NFL by running the ball. It doesn't matter how many times you say you think you do, you don't. You win by passing effectively. And by keeping the other guys from passing effectively.
Whatever stupid criticisms people have about the play calling, or about not running it enough, if Romo doesn't make the three bad decisions in the passing game, we beat Detroit handily. Playing the way we did on Sunday, if Romo doesn't make those three bad decisions, we beat almost anybody handily.
If we want to get where we all want this team to go, we're only going to get there by Tony not making these types of bad decisions in the passing game. That's going to come down to Garrett pulling in the reins in certain game situations because he needs to know, now, that Tony can't be left on those islands. He'll make the aggressive plays that get us beat. Tony needs to recognize those situations better and throw the ball away when he's playing with a lead and the pass is not a sure thing. This is something they can work on. It's something they've *got* to get fixed if we're going to have a shot at the post season.
But these are correctible problems. We've seen Tony play seasons, or long stretches of seasons, where he takes good care of the ball. We should understand intuitively that, as good as Garrett's been, there are things he needs to learn in handling a franchise QB. I can't believe how many of our retarded fans (most of you guys are straight-up retards, by the way) want to give up on an otherwise elite QB who's got obvious ball control issues and start from scratch in a league where there aren't enough quality prospects--much less prospects with anywhere near the talent of the guy you've already got. How's this for an idea: in the absence of a more-talented alternative, expect the team to identify and solve the problem. In the off-season, start working to get a talented alternative in house. Not Stephen McGee. Somebody you think you can ultimately win big with in the NFL. Groom him to bring pressure on Romo. Work with Romo to fix the holes in his game. Between the two of them, you put the Cowboys in a better situation competitively. Then we don't have to listen to you dipshits complain about 'play calling' when it's usually execution of the plays that are called that's the problem. We'll win more, and most of you won't bother to question it.