- Thread starter Doomsday
- Start date
foolforspeed
Spectator
- Messages
- 14
- Reaction score
- 0
After last night I'm not sure they can win another game even against the Redskins. There just seems to be a pattern where every other year is 8 & 8.
foolforspeed
Spectator
- Messages
- 14
- Reaction score
- 0
He's busy with the tantrum with Goodell.
- Messages
- 21,878
- Reaction score
- 4,383
That "pattern" actually holds true as a average finish, for the last 20-plus years.
yimyammer
Pro Bowler
- Messages
- 10,264
- Reaction score
- 4,122
He knows exactly what he's doing and its just how he likes it, winning be damned
ThoughtExperiment
Quality Starter
- Messages
- 9,906
- Reaction score
- 3
Funny and probably true, but our talent is better than our coaching. At least our head coaching.
yimyammer
Pro Bowler
- Messages
- 10,264
- Reaction score
- 4,122
been that way for decades, its just now dawning on us
- Messages
- 21,878
- Reaction score
- 4,383
The thread broke today.
- Messages
- 10,319
- Reaction score
- 6,488
The pitchfork that finally sticks garrett should have way more prongs on it,,
and possibly serrated or barbed
- Messages
- 58,945
- Reaction score
- 9,288
- Messages
- 4,952
- Reaction score
- 0
He should have never got the job in the first place. After that initial Baltimore interest, no team would touch him with a ten-foot pole. He'd be out of the league coaching FCS football somewhere if fired today. He has wasted season after season with poor play calls and coaching gaffes. Can't blame any players until you know that the coaches are maximizing talent. In Dallas, it has been 10 straight seasons of players masking coaching deficiencies.
I'm the biggest Romo homer ever, but his comfort with Garrett was purely disgusting, particularly after being trained under Sean Payton and Lee. Romo had the power to end this Garrett bullshit years ago. Now I'm not sure what it will take. Maybe somebody can photoshop him 69'ing Gene under the stadium artwork.
It's possible that the NFL will end before Garrett is ever fired. I'm fine with either at this point. The playoffs require brilliant coaching (as we saw with the Atlanta collapse last season) so none of these seasons matter anyway.
ThoughtExperiment
Quality Starter
- Messages
- 9,906
- Reaction score
- 3
I still suspect Romo wasn't happy with Garrett but Jerry wouldn't fire him outright. I think he compromised and agreed to get Tony a new OC, which is what led to Linehan.
Because regardless of Garrett's spin, we know he did not want to give up play calling.
- Messages
- 21,878
- Reaction score
- 4,383
Other than saying Garrett is "a great coach."
ThoughtExperiment
Quality Starter
- Messages
- 9,906
- Reaction score
- 3
Meh, lip service. What else is a current player supposed to say in public?
- Messages
- 21,878
- Reaction score
- 4,383
He wasn't asked or prompted. He was just gushing like a schoolboy. It's what he really believes.
- Messages
- 58,945
- Reaction score
- 9,288
I still suspect Romo wasn't happy with Garrett but Jerry wouldn't fire him outright. I think he compromised and agreed to get Tony a new OC, which is what led to Linehan.
Because regardless of Garrett's spin, we know he did not want to give up play calling.
OK, keep on believing that then.
If Romo had said get me a new HC or else, there'd have been a new HC. The fact is he didn't, didn't care. Was just glad to be out there flinging a ball around and making millions.