Orakpo on ESPN Snub: “I’m Gonna Kill the League Next Season”

[sbk92]

I don't think the verdict will be decided by a Cowboys jury.

All I know is if he doesn't blow by Barron at the snap, the hold doesn't happen and we win the game.

 

[LAZARUS_LOGAN]

So anyway.....

Orakpo forced a hold from the inferior Cowboy and won the game for the Redskins.

Very good player. Wish we had him.

So that makes him a very good player because he forced a hold against an INFERIOR Cowboys? Well why was he faced up against the INFERIOR Cowboy in the first place? Oh wait! Because he moved over after GETTING BEAT by an SUPERIOR Cowboy in Doug Free, whom on a number of occasions referred to him as a "piece of shat". Yet that "piece of shat" beat Orakpo and shut him down in all 4 meetings that occured between them. So then if Orakpo is "very good" for beating up on an inferior Cowboys, then that means you would have to revise your opinion on Free as being a piece of shat. I'm amazed but not surprised by you on ragging on Free being that he was the lone Parcells' Olineman pick that panned out. I guess this what happens when you go out of your way trying to be a contrarian, you contradict yourself.


In the second game last year, Orakpo got dominated by the "piece of shat" Free and then Colombo.

Whioch means that either Orakpo is very good---because he dominated Barron, which thus means that Free is not a piece of shat, or Free is a piece of shat still, and Orakpo is not very good since he got dominated by said piece of shat.

One thing for sure is... you're full of shat.

Gotta love it!

 

[LAZARUS_LOGAN]

I don't think the verdict will be decided by a Cowboys jury.

All I know is if he doesn't blow by Barron at the snap, the hold doesn't happen and we win the game.

Wrong. Even if he blows by Barron, and Barron does not hold, the Cowboys when. If Barron did not hold Orakpo, Orakpo still would not have gotten the sack. His angle was way too wide in the first place and Romo had already stepped up into the pocket, that's why all Barron needed to do was simply push him and redirect his momentum. Orakpo whiffs alot.

 

[LAZARUS_LOGAN]

Clay went with the 26th pick in '09 he is great or very good imo.

Orakpo was picked with the 13th pick and I'd say he is good but the jury is still out.

More than likely they are both on steroids.

 

[Bob Sacamano]

sbk would lick anything's asshole that doesn't wear the Star.

 

[sbk92]

Yeah....so anyway. Orakpo's a good player. Wish we had him here. He single-handedly won the game for the Redskins that night. He made the key play and a desperate inferior Cowboy had to tackle him to prevent the superior talent from molesting the QB.

If that were DeMarcus Ware, there'd be a ****** conga line around here in celebration.

It's objective evaluating. Teams don't matter. It's all about what you see on the field. All teams have good players. Orakpo's one on the Redskins.

 

[sbk92]

More than likely they are both on steroids.

That's right. All non Cowboy players with any production are probably on steroids.

 

[sbk92]

Let's mention a ref conspiracy here with these guys to wrap up this tard fest.

 

[Bob Sacamano]

Orakapo said "kill" on the air. That's one step away from a suspension.

 

[Bonecrusher#31]

Orakapo said "kill" on the air. That's one step away from a suspension.

It just shows his Roid Rage for worrying about a ESPN top 10 lol

 

[Bob Sacamano]

It just shows his Roid Rage for worrying about a ESPN top 10 lol

And his disregard for Herr Goodell's royal decrees.

sbk, better hurry up and save his ass.

 

[Cr122]

I'd trade Spencer for Orakpo anyday.

Just thought I'd put that out there.

 

[Bob Sacamano]

I'd trade Spencer for Orakpo anyday.

Just thought I'd put that out there.

Same here.

 

[Cr122]

Same here.

Just imagine those two playing on the same team. Awesomeness.

 

[sbk92]

I'd trade Spencer for Orakpo anyday.

Just thought I'd put that out there.

If you can't get to the QB, you can't play OLB in a 3-4. I don't care how well you play the run.

You have to have rush threats from both sides to make a 3-4 work. That scheme's all about confusion. Who's coming on this down? Nobody's confused playing the Cowboys.

 

[LAZARUS_LOGAN]

sbk would lick anything's asshole that doesn't wear the Star.

Not true. Parcells at one time wore the Star.

 

[LAZARUS_LOGAN]

I'd trade Spencer for Orakpo anyday.

Just thought I'd put that out there.

Of course, as the wind blows with you. People that bag on Spencer for not generating enough sacks are also the same idiots that bag on Spears for the very same reason. No matter that they are both excellant against the run and in Spencer's case in coverage. It's all about the sacks/stats and your desire to jack yourself off to them when they occur. But what happens when they are not getting sacks? Sacks is a glory stat, stopping the run and dropping into coverage is where it's all at. Being a liability against the run and in coverage is worse for a team than not being a great pass rusher. And if that's what you want, then I am glad that you are not running the team.


I guess it's lost on you that perhaps in addition to the steroids that Orakpo is on, that he also had an Albert Haynesworth, particularly in his first year. If you notice his sack numbers decreased coincides with Haynesworth decreased playing time, despite the fact that he was allowed to rush the passer more under Haslett than what he was under Blache.

 

[LAZARUS_LOGAN]

Just imagine those two playing on the same team. Awesomeness.

Unfortunately, teams would simply run to Orakpo's side all day, wouldn't have to worry about passing.

 

[LAZARUS_LOGAN]

If you can't get to the QB, you can't play OLB in a 3-4. I don't care how well you play the run.

You have to have rush threats from both sides to make a 3-4 work. That scheme's all about confusion. Who's coming on this down? Nobody's confused playing the Cowboys.

Once agian you don't know what the f -uck you are talking about because if you look at most 3-4 teams, the SOLB does not generate that many sacks. Spencer is tied for 4th in terms of sacks with SOLBs.

 

[Cr122]

Of course, as the wind blows with you. People that bag on Spencer for not generating enough sacks are also the same idiots that bag on Spears for the very same reason. No matter that they are both excellant against the run and in Spencer's case in coverage. It's all about the sacks/stats and your desire to jack yourself off to them when they occur. But what happens when they are not getting sacks? Sacks is a glory stat, stopping the run and dropping into coverage is where it's all at. Being a liability against the run and in coverage is worse for a team than not being a great pass rusher. And if that's what you want, then I am glad that you are not running the team.


I guess it's lost on you that perhaps in addition to the steroids that Orakpo is on, that he also had an Albert Haynesworth, particularly in his first year. If you notice his sack numbers decreased coincides with Haynesworth decreased playing time, despite the fact that he was allowed to rush the passer more under Haslett than what he was under Blache.

Cry me a river about the wind blowing shit. I'm just another fan who sees the truth side of it and not the homer side of it like yourself and others.

Orakpo is the better player overall, although, I'm not giving up entirely on Spencer yet. Maybe Ryan can get the best out of Spencer this year like he had a couple of years ago. Orakpo was the better pass rusher last year and Spencer had more tackles.

Their not that far off of each other but like I said I would take Orakpo anyday over Spencer. It's just my own opinion of the player. I don't feel that way about every player on our team just some like Bennett, Barber, Choice, and Spencer.