Messages
46,859
Reaction score
5
JON MACHOTA
Special Contributor
jmachota@dallasnews.com
Published: 26 December 2011 04:46 PM


When the critical decisions need to be made, Jerry Jones prefers to take care of business in person. That's why the Cowboys owner and general manager elected to speak with Jason Garrett face-to-face during the first quarter of Saturday’s game at Cowboys Stadium.

Jones said Monday that he prefers this method of communication in some situations, adding that there have been occasions where he has traveled by airplane just to get the opportunity to communicate eye-to-eye.

"You communicate a lot of different ways," Jones said during a radio interview with The Ticket (KTCK-AM 1310). "It isn’t just words. It’s body language, it’s everything. So it’s important to me, when I’m down there, to be evaluating what’s going on on the sideline, and it’s important to me to be communicating with anything I’m about on the sideline.

"In this particular case, I did want nothing to drop between the lines communication-wise. We had talked about clearly what would happen if the Giants won, what we would be doing with Felix [Jones] during this ballgame and the need to have him healthy if we could do anything about it next week. But what we didn’t talk about was what if something happened and there was a question mark about [Tony] Romo, how that would be handled. That’s Jason’s decision, but he doesn’t need to be making that one by himself.

"So I wanted to, very briefly, step down there with just a few minutes gone in the first quarter, sit there and say, 'Here’s the lay of the land. Romo’s got a hand injury, but it looks like we’re going to have him for New York. Felix is there. You make the decision, but our emphasis should be on New York.'"

Jones went on to say that his actions on Saturday where nothing different from how he has handled certain decisions with all of the other head coaches he has employed.

"I’ve talked to every head coach during a ballgame, on the sideline, that we’ve ever had with the Dallas Cowboys," he said.

Jones reassured that he isn’t calling the plays, he doesn’t decide the offensive philosophy and he isn’t determining which players dress on gamedays. But showing his face on the sidelines continues to bring criticism that amazes the man that has owned the franchise since 1989.

"It has amazed me to be criticized for really walking down on the floor of the company or walking into the business that we’re doing, not just the Dallas Cowboys, and not pick up the trash or be interested in how that guy’s treating customers,” Jones explained. “The more involved your top management, the more involved ownership can be, I’ve always thought made the best way for it to work.

"Anybody who has got any sense knows that I didn’t get here alone. I got here with a lot of very smart people and listening to those very smart people and I do do that. We don’t have to take a step back. What we need to do is win. And we need to win this way and a lot of other things then go away.

"You didn’t see that kind of criticism very early on, but we were winning Super Bowls. And it was the same exact way that we handled our decision-making and the exact same way that we handled our ultimate information gathering system. We’ve been doing it ever since I owned the team. The exact same way."
 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
57,933
Reaction score
8,708
Because its Jones, its made into a big deal. But plenty of owners and GM's have went down to the field when their franchise QB's or other VIP has suffered a serious injury.
 
Messages
2,064
Reaction score
0
Because its Jones, its made into a big deal. But plenty of owners and GM's have went down to the field when their franchise QB's or other VIP has suffered a serious injury.

Plenty of owners/GMs go to the field and consult with the HC during games? Interesting.
 
Messages
2,450
Reaction score
0
Because its Jones, its made into a big deal. But plenty of owners and GM's have went down to the field when their franchise QB's or other VIP has suffered a serious injury.

Only Jerrah would go down and address the head coach during the game and think it was ok.
 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
57,933
Reaction score
8,708
Plenty of owners/GMs go to the field and consult with the HC during games? Interesting.

On something like a major injury to their franchises most important player, yeah I've seen it before.

Would have been better had he not went down there, but ultimately its one of those "who cares?" things to me. Jones has been going down to the sidelines since he bought the team. It isnt like he did it for certain coaches and not for others, he's done it with all of our coaches.
 
Messages
2,064
Reaction score
0
On something like a major injury to their franchises most important player, yeah I've seen it before.

Would have been better had he not went down there, but ultimately its one of those "who cares?" things to me. Jones has been going down to the sidelines since he bought the team. It isnt like he did it for certain coaches and not for others, he's done it with all of our coaches.

Going to the sidelines and going to the sidelines and thinking he has to consult with the HC are two different things. Jimmy didn't tolerate that BS and we all know it. When Jerry went down there back then he normally did it late in the game and just watched. He wasn't up in Jimmy's ear acting like he's an assistant or supervisor during the game. He didn't pull that crap with Parcells either. I don't doubt he did it with the others seeing how they (Switzer/Gailey/Campo/Wade) were just puppets much like it appears Jason apparently is.
 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
57,933
Reaction score
8,708
How long was he actually there for? Maybe it is what he said it was.
 
Messages
2,064
Reaction score
0
It's just one more instance that reminds us that Jerry is still pulling the strings. That's why.
 
Messages
46,859
Reaction score
5
This is all you need to know:

Jerry said:
That’s Jason’s decision, but he doesn’t need to be making that one by himself.


There's no justifying or sugarcoating that.
 

superpunk

Pro Bowler
Messages
11,003
Reaction score
0
It's just one more instance that reminds us that Jerry is still pulling the strings. That's why.

Yeah but who cares?

I just have trouble drawing a straight line from "Jerry does stuff and talks to Jason on the field" to "This is why we suck".
 
Messages
2,064
Reaction score
0
Yeah but who cares?

I just have trouble drawing a straight line from "Jerry does stuff and talks to Jason on the field" to "This is why we suck".

I care. Jerry's meddling and undermining the HC's authority has been an issue in the past and it's obvious it's still happening with Garrett. I'm sure if he feels the need to go down to the field and consult with Garrett about this during a game it isn't the only time or issue he has interfered. One it shows he doesn't trust the HC in charge to make the proper decisions. Two it shows the players that the HC doesn't have the full authority regarding issues and therefore plays a part in undermining him.
 

superpunk

Pro Bowler
Messages
11,003
Reaction score
0
So how does this theoretical undermining affect what happens on the field, though?

Has Newman lost the ability to backpedal or stand upright most of the time because Jerry "undermines" Jason?

I get how it affects your perception of Jason and Jerry. I just don't get how it affects anything that matters.
 
Messages
46,859
Reaction score
5
So how does this theoretical undermining affect what happens on the field, though?

Has Newman lost the ability to backpedal or stand upright most of the time because Jerry "undermines" Jason?

I get how it affects your perception of Jason and Jerry. I just don't get how it affects anything that matters.


You don't think Jerry undermining the head coach's authority would have an effect on the team?

Ask Troy Aikman how signing Deion affected the team in the long run. He's discussed in the past how coaches would tell Deion what to do, but plenty of times, Deion wouldn't do it. When threatened, he'd (Deion) say he was going to go talk to Jerry.

Both instances have the same effect. The head coach needs to be respected and feared. If the owners shows an obvious lack of trust in his coach, then why would the players trust their coach.

Players performance is strongly tied to practice habits and effort. Players practice habits and effort are tied to their response to the coaches.

You're being naive if you don't think Jerry's actions don't negatively affect this team on some level.
 
Messages
2,064
Reaction score
0
So how does this theoretical undermining affect what happens on the field, though?

Has Newman lost the ability to backpedal or stand upright most of the time because Jerry "undermines" Jason?

I get how it affects your perception of Jason and Jerry. I just don't get how it affects anything that matters.

What if Jerry were the HC? Would that effect Newman's ability to backpedal or stand upright? Probably not.
But would it have any other effect of the team? hmm...?
 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
57,933
Reaction score
8,708
I care. Jerry's meddling and undermining the HC's authority has been an issue in the past and it's obvious it's still happening with Garrett. I'm sure if he feels the need to go down to the field and consult with Garrett about this during a game it isn't the only time or issue he has interfered. One it shows he doesn't trust the HC in charge to make the proper decisions. Two it shows the players that the HC doesn't have the full authority regarding issues and therefore plays a part in undermining him.

How exactly was he meddling though? If he went down there to do what he said (give Garrett up to date info on Romo's injury and the result of the Giants/Jets game) then what was he "meddling" with exactly?
 
Messages
46,859
Reaction score
5
How exactly was he meddling though? If he went down there to do what he said (give Garrett up to date info on Romo's injury and the result of the Giants/Jets game) then what was he "meddling" with exactly?

You don't think Jerry saying that if a QB plays or not is "not a decision Jason needs to make himself" is meddling?

Really?
 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
57,933
Reaction score
8,708
You don't think Jerry undermining the head coach's authority would have an effect on the team?

Ask Troy Aikman how signing Deion affected the team in the long run. He's discussed in the past how coaches would tell Deion what to do, but plenty of times, Deion wouldn't do it. When threatened, he'd (Deion) say he was going to go talk to Jerry.

Both instances have the same effect. The head coach needs to be respected and feared. If the owners shows an obvious lack of trust in his coach, then why would the players trust their coach.

Players performance is strongly tied to practice habits and effort. Players practice habits and effort are tied to their response to the coaches.

You're being naive if you don't think Jerry's actions don't negatively affect this team on some level.

The Deion stuff was 15 years ago dude, let it go. There's no evidence of anything going on like that now, and hasnt been for years.
 
Messages
46,859
Reaction score
5
The Deion stuff was 15 years ago dude, let it go. There's no evidence of anything going on like that now, and hasnt been for years.

The Deion stuff was brought up to illustrate how important it is for a coach to be viewed as the ultimate authority on a football team.
 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
57,933
Reaction score
8,708
You don't think Jerry saying that if a QB plays or not is "not a decision Jason needs to make himself" is meddling?

Really?

So did he go down there to tell Garrett that Romo could or could not play according to him? Thats what I am missing here I guess. What I read about it the other day was that Jones claimed he went down there to discuss the extent of Romo's injury and the results of the Giants/Jets game. Romo says he wasnt able to grip the ball properly and at that point the trainers said he couldnt go back in the game. Is this not what happened? Is there other info?
 
Top Bottom