I don't know why this kind of shit doesn't leak from the republican side. Or does it?
I'm sure there were plenty of juicy emails through the GOP primary.
Until it happens, I hope this further pisses off Sanders supporters. I heard today there is a massive march headed for the DNC in Philly. I hope to fuck these Sanders idiots continue to give Hillary the finger.
I don't think the establishment is a big fan of Trump.
And yet, the story has zero traction. As planned. Because they picked the perfect time to post the news release.If they didn't want it to gain traction, why release it in the first place?
You realize it's a 24 hour news cycle now with multiple cable news networks. This isn't the 1950s anymore Dooms so your 5pm Friday theory doesn't really fly.
Again, they had this for months, possibly even a year or more. It's the same hack that discovered Hillary's private server, from the same group of hackers. The best time to release it would have been while Bernie was under constant pressure to endorse Hillary, but hadn't done so yet. If in fact, they wanted maximum impact to help Bernie and hurt Hillary.Wikileaks dropped the story now to have an impact this close to the convention.
Julian Assange is no Hillary fan.
Because it is from the same source. Source who is a regular contributor to wikileaks.How do you know they had it then?
Nobody said anything about them being forced to do anything. Another straw man fails.And they're releasing it on their own. They're not being forced to do anything. So your entire hypothesis on why it was released now (least amount of coverage) is just stupid. Because if they didn't want it covered, they didn't have to release it. Duh.
IF this had come out before Bern's endorsement of Hillary, the most likely outcome is that Trump winds up winning in November. Think.Your ramblings would make a lot of sense if the source was pro Hillary.
Julian Assange does not care for Hillary at all. I suspect the leak at this point is to drum up as much protest as possible at the Dem's convention. What's the March at right now? 50k protestors?
Because it is from the same source. Source who is a regular contributor to wikileaks.
doomsday said:Nobody said anything about them being forced to do anything. Another straw man fails.
If this comes out 2 weeks ago, they have two weeks to patch things up before the convention.
The story is much better for Trump if the DNC convention news involves massive protests by, wait for it, . . . .liberals.
Hopefully more liberal protesters show up at the DNC than did at the RNC.
Yeah I hope its chaos. At least then it'll be somewhat interesting.
And thats a good thing. Its why he's so popular.
Democrats are just one step short of soaiclists.Bernie isn't a democrap
He's an admitted socialist who I believe is officially listed as an "independent"
Assange has a status in this "transparency" community. The sources know when they gave the info. His sitting on this indefinitely would be extremely bad faith. Understand - they don't care really who the (D) is, so long as that (D) wins over any (R).If they didn't want exposure, why release it?
Can you answer that?
The fear was, this would tarnish the (D) so much that Bernie's followers would either stay home, or vote Trump. They NEED them to vote Hillary. It's quite evident there aren't too many chess players here.If this comes out 2 weeks ago, they have two weeks to patch things up before the convention.
The story is much better for Trump if the DNC convention news involves massive protests by, wait for it, . . . .liberals.