Messages
46,859
Reaction score
5
Here it is midsummer, and although the blast furnace was a tad late in making a local arrival, the blistering heat showed up just in time to deliver a sweaty goodbye kiss to the Rangers.

With the baseball season over in July — or actually, much earlier in June — it’s the next-team-up syndrome that now applies.

Hello, Cowboys.

Training camp is about to open in Oxnard, Calif. It’s only a week and a couple of days away.

Granted, anything is better than the Rangers at the moment, but then again, we are talking about the Cowboys here. The current excitement level for Jerry and the boys is definitely higher than another Leonys Martin at bat, but …

A gamer like Adrian Beltre taking his hacks is certainly worth watching, which leads to the obvious question. Will the Cowboys be worth watching?

Early answer is: No.

Well, maybe 8-8 again. Even that would be better than the baseball mess on the other end of Randol Mill Road.

At least of the two biggest questions concerning the 2014 Cowboys, one is a positive.

How good can this team be, offensively?

Maybe real good.

On the flip side, the other question and massive doubt about the Cowboys is ongoing from last season:

How bad will the defense be? Even worse than a year ago? Statistically, it can’t be worse than 2013’s ranking of 32nd in the NFL. But the eyeball test of the current level of defensive talent tells us to brace for even worse.

Then again, the offensive positives come with a nagging doubt.

From the Department of Believe It or Not, I don’t know what’s harder to take seriously, the Jon Daniels media apologists for this baseball season or the Tony Romo all-is-well dreamers.

The Daniels apologists are now scrambling in attempting to provide a protection racket for their boy. But are the fans really buying that crap?

Meanwhile, the Romo dreamers, starting with Mr. Jerry, are praying the football gods will protect their boy.

As a Romosexual/Romo-truther, I have admitted repeatedly that Tony drives me nuts as the quarterback of America’s Failed Team. But without him, the Cowboys are 2-14, at best, and hoping not to screw up the first pick in the draft next spring.

Romo is a good quarterback, and if we all don’t agree on that, then you’re wrong and I’m right. But he’s also a cursed quarterback. Bad spit always happens to Tony. It’s in him, and it’s going to come out.

But the real issue at the moment totally centers on another area.

Romo is 34 and coming off two back surgeries in 2013 — before the season and again after.

Is it remotely logical to think Tony is going to stay healthy for 16 games this season? Or two games?

It’s not logical.

And the backup quarterback situation is just that. A backup situation. Based on the current backup candidates, it’s even worse than it’s been.

Talent-wise, it made no sense at all this spring when the Cowboys passed on Johnny Manziel in the draft.

Financial-wise, it made all the sense in the world when Mr. Jerry let Manziel move on, even though it had to kill Mr. Jerry not to bring the Johnny circus to town. Jerry would even admit as much after the draft, also saying that Manziel was the highest-ranked player on the Cowboys’ draft board when they passed on him.

But the massive contract to Romo a year earlier prevented Jerry from “investing” in another QB. If Jerry had just said, “I gave Tony too much money and now I’m stuck with him forever,” then it’d be OK.

But no, Mr. Jerry painted Tony as a wimp by inferring the last thing Romo needs is any competition at quarterback.

I happen to think Manziel will be a good NFL quarterback, therefore providing Romo with competition. Others, of course, don’t think so.

Obviously there were many in the Cowboys’ scouting department who agreed with me, otherwise why was Johnny in the Cowboys’ top 16?

The critics can say Mr. Jerry has spent the last how many seasons in a “Romo friendly” mode, doing his best to ensure Tony is comfortable and free of competition. Those critics would be right.

But dang it, Mr. Jerry remained stuck on that same message in 2014, even with Tony at age 34 and coming off a couple of serious back surgeries.

It makes no sense, but it’s consistency, if nothing else. Stupid consistency.

So here at midsummer 2014, with the Rangers’ already deader than Bob and Ray’s baseball brain, and with the Daniels apologists scrambling to protect their boy Jon, the Cowboys are our next team up.

There’s a safe theory out there that anything will be better than the Rangers.

Well …

In the case of the Cowboys, exactly how safe is that theory?

Leave a message for Randy Galloway at 817-390-7697.
 

Doomsday

High Plains Drifter
Messages
21,917
Reaction score
4,436
Tell us what we don't know Randy.
No kidding. But then he's made a living out of being Captain Obvious. Or Captain Oblivious, whichever you prefer.
But without him, the Cowboys are 2-14, at best, and hoping not to screw up the first pick in the draft next spring.
^^ This is pure hyperbole, you can't possibly know that. Without Romo they might have to like, have a controlled passing game and like, run the ball alot more behind that three first-rounder line. Might even do better than they have.
 

Doomsday

High Plains Drifter
Messages
21,917
Reaction score
4,436
2010: Team was already 1-5 when Romo broke his collarbone.... Was 5-5 after, with him on IR..

The 5-5 includes the road win over previously undefeated Colts.
 

Doomsday

High Plains Drifter
Messages
21,917
Reaction score
4,436
Honestly I'd like to see us try a entire season without the Romo crutch. Hoping he'll snap his achy breaky back in early camp.
 
Messages
355
Reaction score
0
Honestly I'd like to see us try a entire season without the Romo crutch. Hoping he'll snap his achy breaky back in early camp.

Wow. Im guessing you are just saying that to stir shit up OR you're still hoping they tank the season to get a top 5 draft pick. :paper

I guess I should take off my Rose Colored Glasses, huh? :confused
 

Doomsday

High Plains Drifter
Messages
21,917
Reaction score
4,436
Wow. Im guessing you are just saying that to stir shit up OR you're still hoping they tank the season to get a top 5 draft pick.

I guess I should take off my Rose Colored Glasses, huh?
We just got done debunking that "can't win without Romo" myth in post #7. I'd really like to try it without him for a full season.
 
Messages
8,660
Reaction score
0
2010: Team was already 1-5 when Romo broke his collarbone.... Was 5-5 after, with him on IR..
And the team was 1-7 under doofus Wade and had given up. Insert new coach and guys playing for their jobs, and they go 5-3 under Garrett. So I suppose you could blame the start on Romo... or you could blame it on Wade losing the team. I suspect dbair blamed Wade at the time.

The 5-5 includes the road win over previously undefeated Colts.
Colts were 6-5 going into that game.
 

Doomsday

High Plains Drifter
Messages
21,917
Reaction score
4,436
And the team was 1-7 under doofus Wade and had given up. Insert new coach and guys playing for their jobs, and they go 5-3 under Garrett.
EDIT - you're right again. Is that Garrett's ONLY winning record?
So I suppose you could blame the start on Romo.
Nobody was. I merely pointed out that the one time we were without Romo for any extended period of time, we were able to do at least as well as .500 ball without the God of Quarterbacks.
Colts were 6-5 going into that game.
I stand corrected! That was Manning's "slump year" where they managed only 10-6.
 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
59,142
Reaction score
9,444
And the team was 1-7 under doofus Wade and had given up. Insert new coach and guys playing for their jobs, and they go 5-3 under Garrett. So I suppose you could blame the start on Romo... or you could blame it on Wade losing the team. I suspect dbair blamed Wade at the time.

Nobody in their right mind would pin the awful start on Romo. This is the problem with blind homers (of whatever type). They dont see the argument being made for or against, they only see what they want to see.

The argument being made by some (which is not supported by the evidence) is that the team would be far WORSE without Romo, and couldnt possibly win without him. Since he missed more than half of a season previously we have some idea of whether thats true or not, and it wasnt true that year. The team was bad from the start of the season but without Romo, the team did win 5 of their last 10 games. Romo also missed the season finale last yr and we nearly beat Philly with Kyle Orton, who had a very good game other than one or two plays. And that was with a team with an epic bad defense.

Alot of what would happen would depend on who you replace him with. If you replaced him with someone like Quincy Carter, the results of the team probably would be worse. But even an aged Jon Kitna was able to play at a very respectable level and won a few games on what was a bad 2010 team.
 
Messages
8,660
Reaction score
0
Nobody in their right mind would pin the awful start on Romo. This is the problem with blind homers (of whatever type). They dont see the argument being made for or against, they only see what they want to see.

The argument being made by some (which is not supported by the evidence) is that the team would be far WORSE without Romo, and couldnt possibly win without him. Since he missed more than half of a season previously we have some idea of whether thats true or not, and it wasnt true that year. The team was bad from the start of the season but without Romo, the team did win 5 of their last 10 games. Romo also missed the season finale last yr and we nearly beat Philly with Kyle Orton, who had a very good game other than one or two plays. And that was with a team with an epic bad defense.

Alot of what would happen would depend on who you replace him with. If you replaced him with someone like Quincy Carter, the results of the team probably would be worse. But even an aged Jon Kitna was able to play at a very respectable level and won a few games on what was a bad 2010 team.
Well, you're saying the team turned it around without him, which leads one to the inference that with him there was something wrong. You're at least partly blaming it on him.

The 2010 team wasn't nearly as bad as this team we have now. They had just come off a playoff appearance where they went 1-1. They basically stood pat in free agency and the team got complacent. Dez and Lee were just rookies, so they weren't world beaters yet. But that team was eons better than this one. And Kitna had been a solid QB. We're not even gonna have Kyle Orton here, and Weeden's not that.
 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
59,142
Reaction score
9,444
Well, you're saying the team turned it around without him, which leads one to the inference that with him there was something wrong. You're at least partly blaming it on him.

I never said anything about anybody turning anything around. You are putting words in my mouth. I said the team started out bad but did win some games without him. if the argument some of you were making were entirely true, the team would have been far worse without him and not only would we have lost more, but would have probably lost my more lopsided amounts.
The 2010 team wasn't nearly as bad as this team we have now. They had just come off a playoff appearance where they went 1-1. They basically stood pat in free agency and the team got complacent. Dez and Lee were just rookies, so they weren't world beaters yet. But that team was eons better than this one. And Kitna had been a solid QB. We're not even gonna have Kyle Orton here, and Weeden's not that.

You are out of your freaking mind. That team was a trainwreck to start the season.
 
Messages
911
Reaction score
0
no I get I said it but I didn't say those exact words. I phrased it differently and you're wrong.
 
Messages
8,660
Reaction score
0
no I get I said it but I didn't say those exact words. I phrased it differently and you're wrong.
LOL

I never said anything about anybody turning anything around. You are putting words in my mouth. I said the team started out bad but did win some games without him.
Would it not be fair to say that a team that started out poorly, then won some games after a certain point in time "turned it around?"

You are out of your freaking mind. That team was a trainwreck to start the season.
I understand the record was bad. What I'm saying is the talent on that team was way better than the talent on this team. Wake up.
 

bbgun

Administrator
Messages
15,198
Reaction score
2,401
You are out of your freaking mind. That team was a trainwreck to start the season.

not a fan of Alex Barron?

[video=youtube;L9q-cxsYhZ4]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L9q-cxsYhZ4[/video]
 
Top Bottom