Messages
5,432
Reaction score
0
Galloway: Cam could be the man for the Cowboys

Posted Thursday, Jan. 13, 2011

By Randy Galloway

rgalloway@star-telegram.com

Let me get this out of the way early, therefore allowing the abuse obviously headed in this direction to build immediate momentum, and then crescendo in late April.

The NFL Draft is more than three long months away. The Dallas Cowboys pick ninth in the first round.

Here in mid-January, I'm already insisting that when Jerry Jones gives Roger Goodell the name to call, it be:

Cam Newton.

There, I said it. Even my friends have already screamed, "Idiot." But, OK, that's not anything unusual for my friends.

Other catty comments from good pals:

"If you are actually writing that, Cam needs to also steal your computer."

"When Jerry has to pay the kickback cash to Cecil, does it count against the salary cap?"

"Yeah, sure, with all their other desperate needs, it makes perfect sense to draft a quarterback not ready to play when you already have a quarterback."

"Did you not watch the game against Oregon's bad defense? Pretty ordinary-looking quarterback, don't you think?"

Answering that last part:

From the standpoint of his NFL future, Newton was impressive -- to me -- in the bogus national title game because he had to play quarterback, not superstar, once he was taken out of his usual role as the most dynamic player in all of college football.

The Duckies had a great defensive plan. They took away Cam's feet, saying if Cam's going to beat us, it will be with his arm.

Yes, he overthrew a wide-open receiver headed for a touchdown. Yes, he threw a pick. Yes, he underthrew a receiver in the end zone on fourth down. Yes, he fumbled late and that one could have gotten his team beat.

But he managed the game well. Didn't panic. He let the game come to him. He played quarterback based on what the defense was allowing. And the concentration of defense on him also allowed the War Eagles' running game to greatly prosper.

This kid showed he's a quarterback first, not a runner first. His passing accuracy, not so great against Oregon, pleasantly surprised everyone this season. Mel Kiper, the draft guru, calls that accuracy still "underrated."

But the entire package -- arm and feet -- that's what takes Newton far beyond where Vince Young was when coming out of Texas.

Why am I making Young comparisons? Because there are already those comparisons from an NFL point of view, and before anyone else reminds me, my comment on Vince four years ago as a top NFL draft pick was "don't know what he will be, but I'm sure for finding out."

I loved Vince's chances at the next level.

Now we know. If nothing else, Young as an NFL quarterback is soft in the head, still thinks he's a star when he's not even close, and his NFL work ethic has never been where it should be. Vince is also out of a job and out of a team at the moment.

Now there's Newton. By NFL standards, he's a more advanced QB than Young. With Tony Romo already in place, Newton's advantage here would be he could sit for a while. Sit, watch and learn for two years, maybe three.

In hindsight, the worst thing that happened to Young is he was rushed into action as a rookie, debuting, in fact, against the Cowboys one Sunday in Nashville.

His rookie season was also impressive. Unfortunately, it was fool's gold. Slowly but surely, the erosion happened. His game never advanced. Many blame the lack of a work ethic combined with big head-itis.

By all accounts, Newton works his butt off in football study sessions, is a total team guy, and is adored by his Auburn teammates and coaches.

But, yes, quarterback is the one position in the NFL where solid citizen is an absolute must. So does a kid who gets kicked out of one school after buying a stolen computer and allegations of academic cheating, and then is linked to a huge pay-me scandal just two years later at another school, qualify as a solid citizen?

And no, I don't believe that NCAA crap of a ruling that Cam never knew his daddy, Cecil, was pimping him to the highest bidder.

By the time the investigation in that case is finally finished, Newton's name could well be tarnished again when the No. 1 hardware is removed -- see Reggie Bush and USC -- from the grasp of War Eagle World.

When it comes to solid citizen credentials, those who deal with Newton obviously have to concede Cam's track record is a tad spotty, but they swear that's not this kid. Not now.

Cam is a junior who announced Thursday he would enter the draft. There was no question he was, let us say, "encouraged," to leave college football immediately because of the pay-me cloud.

At Auburn, as the NFL people conduct a thorough investigation -- and it will be very thorough -- what they will hear repeatedly on Newton is "first-class citizen in all areas, even in attending class." (I know, it's hard to believe SEC players actually attend class. Well, except at Vandy.)

Among NFL voices, I hear more concerns about attitude and such surrounding Ryan Mallett (the Arkansas quarterback who has declared for the draft) than I do about Newton. Mallett, by the way, would be wise to prepare himself well for some harsh scouting combine interviews that are surely coming.

But keep an open mind on Newton to the Cowboys in the draft. Think Aaron Rodgers.

Brett Favre was firmly entrenched in Green Bay when the Pack took Rodgers. He sat for three years. Look at him now. Look at Favre now, and I don't mean his text photos.

Romo will be 31 in April. Favre was like in his late 40s, early 50s (actually, he was 35) when Green Bay drafted Rodgers.

We all know about the other Cow needs in April, but the Pack also had many needs when Rodgers fell their first-round way in the draft.

I'm just saying Newton is the best player in college football, he's a quarterback with an NFL skill set, and he's a playmaker deluxe.

In the end, you win with playmakers.

Only an idiot would say the Cowboys should draft Cam?

Count me in.
 
C

Cr122

Guest
I don't know what I'd do if we drafted Newton.

We have other needs and I think there's a better option at 9.
 

LAZARUS_LOGAN

Pro Bowler
Messages
14,639
Reaction score
207
When I first saw the title of the article, I was thinking that the Cowboys might be looking at Cam Cameron for OC. And then I saw the Newton....LOL!!!
 

sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
I like the thought process of considering a QB.

Not sure about the player.
 

sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
Is your response the same if the pick is Gabbert?

Just askin'.

I wouldn't hate it, but it probably wouldn't be my first choice when we're on the clock.

Most Cowboys fans would hate it. They have Romo. And he's the best and will be for the next 25 years. We should use our draft picks to fill immediate needs since that's clearly the smart way to go about it.
 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
57,572
Reaction score
8,204
If the OL, pass rush and safety positions werent such an issue, maybe you'd consider taking a QB #1. I wouldnt take Newton with any pick however.

The fact that the worst commissioner in NFL history is going to ruin the offseason for everyone though probably rules out any kind of thinking like you propose, because there wont be a free agency before the draft.
 
Messages
46,859
Reaction score
5
Most Cowboys fans would hate it. They have Romo. And he's the best and will be for the next 25 years. We should use our draft picks to fill immediate needs since that's clearly the smart way to go about it.

No, most Cowboys fans would hate it because they understand we don't have the luxury of taking a player that doesn't fill an immediate need.

If a QB falls to us that is head and shoulders the BPA, then the selection is warranted. But since Luck decided to return to school, there is not another QB that meets that criteria.

Gabbert, Newton, Mallett, and Locker could cure cancer at the Combine while throwing 80 yard bombs through a tire, and they still wouldn't be rated significantly higher than what many presume will be available while were on the clock.
 
Messages
165
Reaction score
0
No, most Cowboys fans would hate it because they understand we don't have the luxury of taking a player that doesn't fill an immediate need.
Grab a QB now and develop him during the remaining few seasons we have Romo and the window doesn't close. If the window doesn't close, you don't have immediate needs in the draft.
 
Messages
46,859
Reaction score
5
Grab a QB now and develop him during the remaining few seasons we have Romo and the window doesn't close. If the window doesn't close, you don't have immediate needs in the draft.

There isn't a QB worth taking at 9.

Romo still has about 4 years of 4k 30 td seasons ahead of him. You don't draft a QB at 9 and sit him for four years.

Now, if you tell me you want to spend a 4th rounder or below on a developmental QB, with the hopes he could take Romo's place in 4 years, then I'm all for it.

But not at 9. And not on any of these QB's that'll be available at 9. None of them are worth a shit.
 

NoShame

UDFA
Messages
2,797
Reaction score
0
We're not drafting a fuckin' QB. Especially Cam Newton.

I know I've said it a million times already but we have too many other positions of need with which the best possible player availabe strategy should be taken.

I'm pretty dead set on taking someone for the OL but I wouldn't be against taking an impact player on defense.
 
Messages
165
Reaction score
0
There isn't a QB worth taking at 9.

Romo still has about 4 years of 4k 30 td seasons ahead of him. You don't draft a QB at 9 and sit him for four years.

Now, if you tell me you want to spend a 4th rounder or below on a developmental QB, with the hopes he could take Romo's place in 4 years, then I'm all for it.

But not at 9. And not on any of these QB's that'll be available at 9. None of them are worth a shit.

IMO, Carimi is the guy I want at 9 anyhow. But, I won't get upset at a QB.

Also, I think Romo having 4 more elite years in him is a pipe dream. I'm guessing 2.
 
Messages
46,859
Reaction score
5
Also, I think Romo having 4 more elite years in him is a pipe dream. I'm guessing 2.

Based on what?

He'll be 31 when the season starts. Didn't become a full time starter until he was 26, so he doesn't have too much wear and tear on his body. And quality QB's regularly play until their mid 30's.

You think his play will drop off considerably within 2 years to the point he'll need replacing?
 
Messages
165
Reaction score
0
Based on what?

He'll be 31 when the season starts. Didn't become a full time starter until he was 26, so he doesn't have too much wear and tear on his body. And quality QB's regularly play until their mid 30's.

You think his play will drop off considerably within 2 years to the point he'll need replacing?

I think in 2 years, with a mixture of crappy OL play which will cause a lot of wear and tear on him as it did this season, along with his physical tools starting to decline. A lot of what makes Romo good is his escapability, and that will be one of the first to go. If Romo was more like a Drew Bledsoe in terms of mobility, he would be average at best and that's how he'll look when he starts to slow down.

Might as well groom his replacement for a few years like Aaron Rodgers was so when Romo does start to decline, we don't skip a beat. Unless you'd rather wait too long like we did with Aikman and then end up with a flurry of Quincy Carter's, Chad Hutchinson's, Clint Stoerner's and whatever else crap we found.
 
Messages
46,859
Reaction score
5
If Romo was more like a Drew Bledsoe in terms of mobility, he would be average at best and that's how he'll look when he starts to slow down.

I think you're way off on this. But whatever.

Might as well groom his replacement for a few years like Aaron Rodgers was so when Romo does start to decline, we don't skip a beat. Unless you'd rather wait too long like we did with Aikman and then end up with a flurry of Quincy Carter's, Chad Hutchinson's, Clint Stoerner's and whatever else crap we found.

Aaron Rodgers was an expected top 5 pick (predicted #1 overall leading into the draft) that fell to what, 24?

And I'd argue there isn't a QB in this class (maybe Gabbert... maybe) that grades out like AR did.

If there isn't a clear cut top of the board QB sitting there when we go on the clock, then it'd be foolish to take one. What I mean is, if we go on the clock and we have a corner, OLB, DE, DT & QB sitting there, all with 93-95 grades, then we'd be best served go after the corner, DE, or DT.

But if we have a QB with a 98 grade, and everyone else is at 92 or below, then take the QB. But there isn't that QB in this draft.

You want to develop a QB, fine... take one in a later round and develop him. Not at 9.
 

LAZARUS_LOGAN

Pro Bowler
Messages
14,639
Reaction score
207
I wouldn't hate it, but it probably wouldn't be my first choice when we're on the clock.

Most Cowboys fans would hate it. They have Romo. And he's the best and will be for the next 25 years. We should use our draft picks to fill immediate needs since that's clearly the smart way to go about it.


And yet you bitch and moan about Cowboys' fans for wanting to take a CB and how we need to fix the Dline and shit. Whatever.
 
Top Bottom