sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
Posted by nickeatman at 1/26/2011 12:35 PM CST on truebluefanclub.com


Ok, let’s clarify that – not saying to forget the No. 9 overall pick completely. Obviously that draft pick will be one of the most important selections the Cowboys will make in quite some time. Whoever they take, he has to be someone who can play immediately.

You might not have liked everything Jerry Jones said this week down here at the Senior Bowl, but you have to agree with that statement – the No. 9 pick has to contribute right away.

But, since we’re here in Mobile, Ala., watching some of the best senior prospects only, it’s safe to say there aren’t many candidates here the Cowboys could take at No. 9. Maybe Texas A&M’s Von Miller is in that range, but I don’t know if he’ll be a great 3-4 fit and if so, he’d probably be a situational player right now. You can’t take that at No. 9.

And maybe Colorado offensive tackle Nate Solder will jump up to that range. He looks a lot like Doug Free, or even John Phillips. Solder has great size and agility.

Ok, so let’ move past the first round and onto the second round, where the Cowboys will pick 40th overall. Now this place is flooded with players for that pick.

Let’s take a look at five guys who could be good fits for this team at that spot:

Colorado CB Jalil Brown (6-0, 202) – This is a guy who could actually slide up to the first round and out of the Cowboys’ reach. But he’s got the size teams are looking for and he’s one of the best press-corners out there. He seems to be very physical in practice – which is the only time he’ll get to do that since the Senior Bowl rules don’t allow man coverage in the game on Saturday. Brown was also named his team’s Special Teams Player of the Year at Colorado as a freshman for his ability to cover kicks.

Oklahoma S Quinton Carter (6-0, 211) – Ok, so his name might be pretty close to another Cowboys’ second round pick. But Carter is an interesting player because he’s more of an old-fashioned strong safety. Yes, the Cowboys need more help at free safety, but let’s not dismiss the fact Gerald Sensabaugh could really play either spot. Carter certainly looks the part and he’s considered a “walk-down” safety who can really control things near the line of scrimmage. Plus, he’d be a solid special teams addition as well.

Baylor OL Danny Watkins (6-3, 312) – Talk about an interesting story, Watkins is a former Canadian firefighter who has only played four seasons of organized football, including the last two at Baylor where he started at left tackle. Watkins is actually playing both guard and tackle this week and is certainly turning some heads because of strength and tenacity. You’re always looking for versatility on the line and a guy like this could be a fix at both guard or tackle, depending on what the Cowboys need the most.

Iowa DE Christian Ballard (6-4, 288) – Despite Jerry Jones saying he’s confident about the front seven, you can never have too many strong players up front. Plus, who knows what will happen with three unrestricted free agents at DE in Bowen, Spears and Hatcher. But Ballard could be a good fit a 3-4 defensive end. This is the area where Ballard may get picked, but Cowboys and Rob Ryan might feel like you can find some quality players at this position later on in the draft.

Oregon LB Casey Matthews (6-0, 232) – He’d probably be an inside backer in a 3-4 scheme. And with Sean Lee taken in the second round last season, with both Brooking and Bradie James expected to return, it could be crowded here. But the fact his brother is playing so well in Green Bay and his football genes, Matthews figures to be a good player as well. He made a few instinctive plays in the national championship and has picked off a few passes in practice at the Senior Bowl. If he’s the best available on the board, he should be considered.
 

cmd34

Pro Bowler
Messages
11,877
Reaction score
119
Oklahoma S Quinton Carter (6-0, 211) – Ok, so his name might be pretty close to another Cowboys’ second round pick. But Carter is an interesting player because he’s more of an old-fashioned strong safety. Yes, the Cowboys need more help at free safety, but let’s not dismiss the fact Gerald Sensabaugh could really play either spot. Carter certainly looks the part and he’s considered a “walk-down” safety who can really control things near the line of scrimmage. Plus, he’d be a solid special teams addition as well.

First off, Sensabaugh can't play either spot.

Carter should be the guy at 40. We can't keep ignoring the safety position and then act all surprised when we are constantly beat deep. If Rahim Moore somehow slips to 40, I'd want him over Carter.
 

SixisBetter

Anywhere on the line.
Messages
4,211
Reaction score
370
Ok, let’s clarify that – not saying to forget the No. 9 overall pick completely. Obviously that draft pick will be one of the most important selections the Cowboys will make in quite some time. Whoever they take, he has to be someone who can play immediately.

You might not have liked everything Jerry Jones said this week down here at the Senior Bowl, but you have to agree with that statement – the No. 9 pick has to contribute right away.

This is what I mean when I say we must take an impact player at the #9 spot.

I can't believe I'm agreeing with the Ober Fuhrer.

I also believe we've got to have an immediate contributor at #40,as well.

I wouldn't mind taking Matthews there,but like the article said,it's crowded there already.

So a safety it is.

Maybe.
 

Bob Sacamano

All-Pro
Messages
26,436
Reaction score
3
I don't care about covering the deep half from the strong safety position as much as I want one who will cut his teeth in the running game. While most teams can bring an 8th man in the box, we can't because none of our safeties know how to tackle. At best get run over. Makes us very, one dimensional.

So Quinton Cater it is.
 
Last edited:

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
58,563
Reaction score
9,056
Posted by nickeatman at 1/26/2011 12:35 PM CST on truebluefanclub.com


Ok, let’s clarify that – not saying to forget the No. 9 overall pick completely. Obviously that draft pick will be one of the most important selections the Cowboys will make in quite some time. Whoever they take, he has to be someone who can play immediately.

You might not have liked everything Jerry Jones said this week down here at the Senior Bowl, but you have to agree with that statement – the No. 9 pick has to contribute right away.

But, since we’re here in Mobile, Ala., watching some of the best senior prospects only, it’s safe to say there aren’t many candidates here the Cowboys could take at No. 9. Maybe Texas A&M’s Von Miller is in that range, but I don’t know if he’ll be a great 3-4 fit and if so, he’d probably be a situational player right now. You can’t take that at No. 9.

And maybe Colorado offensive tackle Nate Solder will jump up to that range. He looks a lot like Doug Free, or even John Phillips. Solder has great size and agility.

Ok, so let’ move past the first round and onto the second round, where the Cowboys will pick 40th overall. Now this place is flooded with players for that pick.

Let’s take a look at five guys who could be good fits for this team at that spot:

Colorado CB Jalil Brown (6-0, 202) – This is a guy who could actually slide up to the first round and out of the Cowboys’ reach. But he’s got the size teams are looking for and he’s one of the best press-corners out there. He seems to be very physical in practice – which is the only time he’ll get to do that since the Senior Bowl rules don’t allow man coverage in the game on Saturday. Brown was also named his team’s Special Teams Player of the Year at Colorado as a freshman for his ability to cover kicks.

Oklahoma S Quinton Carter (6-0, 211) – Ok, so his name might be pretty close to another Cowboys’ second round pick. But Carter is an interesting player because he’s more of an old-fashioned strong safety. Yes, the Cowboys need more help at free safety, but let’s not dismiss the fact Gerald Sensabaugh could really play either spot. Carter certainly looks the part and he’s considered a “walk-down” safety who can really control things near the line of scrimmage. Plus, he’d be a solid special teams addition as well.

Baylor OL Danny Watkins (6-3, 312) – Talk about an interesting story, Watkins is a former Canadian firefighter who has only played four seasons of organized football, including the last two at Baylor where he started at left tackle. Watkins is actually playing both guard and tackle this week and is certainly turning some heads because of strength and tenacity. You’re always looking for versatility on the line and a guy like this could be a fix at both guard or tackle, depending on what the Cowboys need the most.

Iowa DE Christian Ballard (6-4, 288) – Despite Jerry Jones saying he’s confident about the front seven, you can never have too many strong players up front. Plus, who knows what will happen with three unrestricted free agents at DE in Bowen, Spears and Hatcher. But Ballard could be a good fit a 3-4 defensive end. This is the area where Ballard may get picked, but Cowboys and Rob Ryan might feel like you can find some quality players at this position later on in the draft.

Oregon LB Casey Matthews (6-0, 232) – He’d probably be an inside backer in a 3-4 scheme. And with Sean Lee taken in the second round last season, with both Brooking and Bradie James expected to return, it could be crowded here. But the fact his brother is playing so well in Green Bay and his football genes, Matthews figures to be a good player as well. He made a few instinctive plays in the national championship and has picked off a few passes in practice at the Senior Bowl. If he’s the best available on the board, he should be considered.

Sorry Nick, dont like any of these guys for us at 40
 

sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
This is what I mean when I say we must take an impact player at the #9 spot.

I can't believe I'm agreeing with the Ober Fuhrer.

I also believe we've got to have an immediate contributor at #40,as well.

I wouldn't mind taking Matthews there,but like the article said,it's crowded there already.

So a safety it is.

Maybe.

I don't agree with what Eatman said everybody would agree with.

Saying a draft pick must be an instant impact is another way of saying drafting for need.
 

Bob Sacamano

All-Pro
Messages
26,436
Reaction score
3
I don't agree with what Eatman said everybody would agree with.

Saying a draft pick must be an instant impact is another way of saying drafting for need.

Or it could mean drafting BPA. We could use some more playmakers. I'd say that is an immediate need.
 

sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
Or it could mean drafting BPA. We could use some more playmakers. I'd say that is an immediate need.

No. It couldn't mean that at all.

If you say a draft pick must impact year one, you are saying the guy must play at a position that allows him a chance to be an instant contributor on your roster.

It's just a fancy way of saying draft for need. BPA means the guy could be buried behind quality depth initially.
 

Bob Sacamano

All-Pro
Messages
26,436
Reaction score
3
No. It couldn't mean that at all.

If you say a draft pick must impact year one, you are saying the guy must play at a position that allows him a chance to be an instant contributor on your roster.

It's just a fancy way of saying draft for need. BPA means the guy could be buried behind quality depth initially.

In your backwards fantasy world where you make up anything that suits your fancy that's what it means.
 

sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
But that's the m.o. with this GM. He doesn't have any foresight. Everything is in the here and now. He can't see years into the future. That's why the offensive line is in such shambles.

The NFL draft is all about acquiring building blocks for your future and this bubbachucker is talking about how the first pick absolutely has to provide impact the first year. It's retarded.
 

sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
In your backwards fantasy world where you make up anything that suits your fancy that's what it means.

Yeah, I'm making up things.

Saying the first pick must have a major role on the team the first year is not saying drafting for need.

You're a complete and total moron.
 

Bob Sacamano

All-Pro
Messages
26,436
Reaction score
3
But that's the m.o. with this GM. He doesn't have any foresight. Everything is in the here and now. He can't see years into the future. That's why the offensive line is in such shambles.

The NFL draft is all about acquiring building blocks for your future and this bubbachucker is talking about how the first pick absolutely has to provide impact the first year. It's retarded.

I'll agree with you there. Just 2 years ago he said he never drafted WRs high because they take too long to make an impact. Dude talks out of both sides of his mouth.

You know, you and him are kind of alike. Just he's successful.
 
Last edited:

sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
I'll agree with you there. Just 2 years ago he said he never drafted WRs high because they take too long to make an impact. Dude talks about of both sides of his mouth.

You know, you and him are kind of alike.

Don't care if you agree. Only care that I'm right.
 
Top Bottom