superpunk

Pro Bowler
Messages
11,003
Reaction score
0
The Dallas Cowboys were almost $20 million over the salary cap when the offseason began, but the restructuring of some contracts, new contracts for Tony Romo and Doug Free, as well as the release of some players has put the Cowboys roughly $9.7 million under the cap.

The $9.7 million are the latest figure for the Cowboys, who today gained $2 million in cap space when the release of defensive end Marcus Spears took effect per the June 1 rules. The June 1 rule allows teams to move part of the cap impact of releasing a player into the next season.

Per OverTheCap.com, 10 teams took advantage of the rule this year. The Raiders got the biggest cap relief from a single player release with $8 million gained through the release of Michael Huff, the Dolphins realized the biggest overall cap relief with $10.7 million cap space generated by designating Carlos Dansby and Kevin Burnett June 1 releases.

The Cowboys could generate even more cap space in the coming weeks: Anthony Spencer is playing under the franchise tag for $10.6 million, but his cap number could be decreased if he is signed to a long-term deal. The Cowboys have until July 15 to reach a deal with Spencer.

The Cowboys will use their cap space to sign the remaining rookies, and may also use it to re-sign some of their young stars like Sean Lee and Dez Bryant early - or they can simply move the remaining space into next year. The new CBA gives teams the right to carry over any unused cap space into the next year.

Going by OverTheCap.com and by the NFLPAs public report on the salary cap number by team, here are the top teams in terms of available cap space, with the remaining NFC East teams added for good measure:

Rank Team Current Contracts June 2 cap room
1 Browns 51 31.1
2 Jaguars 51 26.9
3 Eagles 51 22.6
4 Bengals 51 20.0
5 Bills 50 19.0
6 Buccaneers 51 18.7
7 Dolphins 51 17.9
8 Packers 50 13.1
9 Cardinals 51 10.8
10 Jets 51 10.0
11 Dallas Cowboys 51 9.7
27 Giants 50 3.3
32 Redskins 51 1.4
But before we collectively break out in irrational exuberance at the cap space available, it's important to keep in mind that the salary cap is just funny money invented for league accounting purposes. A few restructured contracts and a couple of judicious cuts and almost any team can generate significant cap space if it wants to. In a story titled "Cowboys In Awful Cap Situation: Same Story, Different Year?" from mid-February, I wrote the following:

In summary, it's funny how we as sports fans collectively get hung up so much on discussing accounting procedures. The salary cap is an accounting tool aggressively used by Cowboys, which often leads to the perception that the Cowboys are in "cap hell". They are not. What they are instead is a team that overspends but underperforms relative to its competitors. And that is the much bigger issue.

And that statement is as true then as it is now, a couple of million dollars over or under the cap won't change that. The Cowboys, like any other team, will always find ways to get under the cap. The much bigger concern for us fans should be whether they are spending their money wisely.

:whistle
 
Messages
46,859
Reaction score
5
How are we under the cap?

Oh. By restructuring contracts (pushing money into future years), and releasing players.

The same thing every other team can do.

The majority of them, however, don't put themselves in a position to where that is needed year after year.

If you honestly thing we're in a good spot with our cap, then you're beyond hope.
 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
58,671
Reaction score
9,126
How are we under the cap?

Oh. By restructuring contracts (pushing money into future years), and releasing players.

The same thing every other team can do.

The majority of them, however, don't put themselves in a position to where that is needed year after year.

If you honestly thing we're in a good spot with our cap, then you're beyond hope.

Looks like 21 teams are in a worse situation
 

superpunk

Pro Bowler
Messages
11,003
Reaction score
0
How are we under the cap?

Oh. By restructuring contracts (pushing money into future years), and releasing players.

The same thing every other team can do.

The majority of them, however, don't put themselves in a position to where that is needed year after year.

If you honestly thing we're in a good spot with our cap, then you're beyond hope.

We have space - we show year after year that we can sign whoever we want - explain our bad position. Be specific. How exactly is our cap situation hurting us? What players have we missed out on because we couldn't afford them? What players have left our team because we didn't have the space to re-sign them?
 
Messages
46,859
Reaction score
5
These are all questions that have been asked and answered in the past. Use the search feature.
 
Messages
10,636
Reaction score
0
We have space - we show year after year that we can sign whoever we want - explain our bad position. Be specific. How exactly is our cap situation hurting us? What players have we missed out on because we couldn't afford them? What players have left our team because we didn't have the space to re-sign them?

Ben Grubbs?

And for sure mario Williams and micheal huff
 

superpunk

Pro Bowler
Messages
11,003
Reaction score
0
But before we collectively break out in irrational exuberance at the cap space available, it's important to keep in mind that the salary cap is just funny money invented for league accounting purposes. A few restructured contracts and a couple of judicious cuts and almost any team can generate significant cap space if it wants to. In a story titled "Cowboys In Awful Cap Situation: Same Story, Different Year?" from mid-February, I wrote the following:

In summary, it's funny how we as sports fans collectively get hung up so much on discussing accounting procedures. The salary cap is an accounting tool aggressively used by Cowboys, which often leads to the perception that the Cowboys are in "cap hell". They are not. What they are instead is a team that overspends but underperforms relative to its competitors. And that is the much bigger issue.

I wonder if people will ever realize this.
 
Messages
46,859
Reaction score
5
We literally just had this conversation about two months ago.

You were wrong then, and you're wrong now.

Carry on.
 

superpunk

Pro Bowler
Messages
11,003
Reaction score
0
No they don't.

Yes they do. You just don't hear about how the Steelers signed Antonio Brown last year, then had to immediately restructure his contract (along with a few others on their team) so they could be cap compliant, and lost Mike Wallace anyway. Lamar Woodley has been a disappointment since the Steelers re-signed him two seasons ago, going from double digit sacks every season to 9, then 4, has had teammates ripping his work ethic, but the Steelers restructured his contract as well this season to be compliant. And still lost Mike Wallace anyway. They've also restructured Ben Roethlisberger's deal every year I believe for the past three seasons, and as I might have mentioned before....still lost Mike Wallace anyway. They haven't signed a top free agent in what, a decade?

And that's just one example. There are plenty of others. It's just one of several ways to do business.

Run along.
 
Messages
46,859
Reaction score
5
Oh. So the Steelers - who are basically in the playoffs every year and recently won a Super Bowl - had to restructure 3 contracts this off season.

We restructured 7. This year.

Carry on.
 

bkeavs

UDFA
Messages
2,189
Reaction score
0
Oh. So the Steelers - who are basically in the playoffs every year and recently won a Super Bowl - had to restructure 3 contracts this off season.

We restructured 7. This year.

Carry on.

Ouch
 

superpunk

Pro Bowler
Messages
11,003
Reaction score
0
Oh. So the Steelers - who are basically in the playoffs every year and recently won a Super Bowl - had to restructure 3 contracts this off season.

We restructured 7. This year.

Carry on.

You've conflated the issue. It's not a question of whether or not a team has had success with the strategy - it's whether we are in "cap hell". There are plenty of teams who do it the way you want teams to operate and miss the playoffs every fucking season.

Get back on track. We're discussing cap hell not how you manage the cap vs. team performance. The Steelers have missed the playoffs two of the last four seasons. But that doesn't matter to this discussion because we are talking about managing the cap, and whether the way we do it can work for a team trying to field a roster. The Steelers do it this way, and can't sign anyone. We do it this way, and can sign whoever we want. Other teams do it other ways. The point is, stop bitching like a little ************ about "cap hell". It doesn't exist. There's always more money. I've proved that over and over again. Still waiting on you to prove anything. Please. Be outrageously specific. Generate a list of FAs we've wanted but missed out on because we had no money. Or a list of elite FAs that have left our team because we couldn't afford them.

I'll wait.

Until then stfu dickbag.
 

superpunk

Pro Bowler
Messages
11,003
Reaction score
0
Still waiting on you to prove anything. Please. Be outrageously specific. Generate a list of FAs we've wanted but missed out on because we had no money. Or a list of elite FAs that have left our team because we couldn't afford them.

I'll wait.

Until then stfu dickbag.
 
Top Bottom