Pro Football Talk reports that the Cowboys feel Murray’s success was due more to their strong offensive line than his individual skills.
I have to call BS on this. Murray's average yards per carry has stayed pretty much the same his entire career. Even when you feed him the ball 400 times. Is this chicken and the egg?
Murrary was here before the "strong offensive line" was. So, is his increased production merely the product of more carries? The math says it is - and maybe if Dallas had been giving him the ball alot more starting in his second year we might have seen similar results team wide to what we saw last year. Better defense because seeing alot less snaps, better 3rd down conversion percentage because relying less on the pass and getting shorter yardage to go on 3rd down, and very likely your offensive line gels and has success and you don't spend three first round picks on it - because it doesn't have the perception of being "bad" when year after year you have a 1,500 yard running back.
Does anyone here think Murray doesn't get more yards and have his average stay about the same, if he gets 100 more carries in 2011, 12 and 13?
If his YPC average had taken a significant dip upon the introduction of more workload, then you might have a case for the "great offensive line carrying him." It didn't, so you don't.