ok, your delusional now but ok
I'm not going to argue that getting three starters is potentially better than two, but you've already made the argument to me that picking players earlier yields better results and if so, we got two of the highest rated players at positions we needed help at.
No my logic is sound. I know Martin. He was one of the best players on my favorite college team. I have said he could be a pro-bowl guard in a few years, but is most likely a slightly above average tackle. He has great intangibles, solid smarts, and good footwork. But he is smallish, does not push guys around, and has short arms. These limit his effectiveness at tackle.
Given that you can find great G in the 3rd round, then I would have changed my draft strategy. What we didn't know yesterday is that the Cowboys had a hard-on for Lawrence. Several national writers said they could see Lawrence going in the first. So if so, why didn't the Cowboys just pick him there.
Say they didn't get value at 16 trading back, but could pick up a 3rd. Then they could have gotten Lawrence plus 3 other starters in the first 3 rounds. Even if the trade value didn't work out for them, their overall haul of players would have yielded a better result.
The more I turn their options over in my mind, the more scenarios I can build where they improve their overall team more than what they did.
Sort of like what the 49ers, Patriots, and Ravens do every year.