Status
Not open for further replies.

LAZARUS_LOGAN

Pro Bowler
Messages
14,639
Reaction score
207
Philly has that contract to deal with and also DeSean Jackson wanting a big time extension.

I have a feeling at least one of the two deals doesn't go well.

And Kolb is also a UFA after this season. He signed that one year $12 million deal. So the Eagles have some things to work out. And if they do re-sign Vick, I imagine that his style of game will change. Imagine, your 30-something QB that you invested a great deal of money in is running about all over the place and he's already proven susceptable to injury.
 
Messages
46,859
Reaction score
5
There is D. Jackson again. Disappearing in a big, big game.

He's one dimensional.

He has electric speed. But he's not a great route runner, and he doesn't have great hands/body control.

You take his speed away, which the injury yesterday likely did slightly, and he's a non factor.

The notion that he was the best receiver in the division is a joke.
 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
58,638
Reaction score
9,104
Also, I'm hoping the Super Bowl is Patriots vs Falcons.

I hate both those teams. I wanted Seattle vs KC, but KC couldnt hold up their end. Now I'm looking for Seattle vs NYJ, with Seattle winning after Nick Folk misses a potential game winning 20 yd FG
 

sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
Thank you Packers.

There is D. Jackson again. Disappearing in a big, big game.

He got rolled up on and hurt his knee. It happens.

Like it happened to Dez Bryant and ended his season.

"There goes Dez Bryant again. Disappearing for the season."
 

sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
DeSean Jackson was clearly the best WR in the division.

Clearly.

Now next year I might put Bryant or Nicks ahead of the supreme talent. Maybe.
 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
58,638
Reaction score
9,104
DeSean Jackson was clearly the best WR in the division.

Clearly.

Now next year I might put Bryant or Nicks ahead of the supreme talent. Maybe.

LOL! Clearly your an idiot.

Give me Austin, Bryant or Nicks EASILY over your made of glass midgit. If Steve Smith is 100%, I'd probably take him too.

Jackson is a good punt returner and has explosive speed, but his pure WR skills are mediocre. Mediocre hands and mediocre route runner.
 

sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
LOL! Clearly your an idiot.

Give me Austin, Bryant or Nicks EASILY over your made of glass midgit. If Steve Smith is 100%, I'd probably take him too.

Jackson is a good punt returner and has explosive speed, but his pure WR skills are mediocre. Mediocre hands and mediocre route runner.

Complete moron.

Jackson could lose half his talent and be better than Miles Austin.
 

Plymkr

2
Messages
2,126
Reaction score
0
I would take Hicks over Jackson, Maclin over Jackson. He is an average WR, and a good PR. Not even close to the best in the division.
 
Messages
46,859
Reaction score
5
DeSean Jackson was clearly the best WR in the division.

Clearly.

Now next year I might put Bryant or Nicks ahead of the supreme talent. Maybe.

Complete moron.

Jackson could lose half his talent and be better than Miles Austin.

These two posts are retarded.

All Jackson has is electric speed. Once that is dimished, he's a virtual non-factor.
 

sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
I would take Hicks over Jackson, Maclin over Jackson. He is an average WR, and a good PR. Not even close to the best in the division.

It's hard to take you seriously when you call him an average WR.

If he was a Cowboy, every window licker here would be falling out of their harnesses praising Jackson.

I know which WR I'd least like to face if I was a defensive coordinator.
 

Cythim

2
Messages
3,919
Reaction score
0
Teams don't want to face him because he is a great athlete, not a great WR. Teams don't want to face Vick either but he isn't on the level of Manning or Brady in terms of being a great QB.
 

sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
Teams don't want to face him because he is a great athlete, not a great WR. Teams don't want to face Vick either but he isn't on the level of Manning or Brady in terms of being a great QB.

Stop with the nonsense. He's a great WR.

Vick was a great QB this year.
 
Messages
46,859
Reaction score
5
Teams don't want to face him because he is a great athlete, not a great WR. Teams don't want to face Vick either but he isn't on the level of Manning or Brady in terms of being a great QB.

Great point.

He's fast and can get behind defenses. But that doesn't make him the best receiver in the division. The notion that he is is moronic. Almost as if the person who argues he is bases his thoughts off of SportsCenter highlights, while lacking a fundamental understanding of the wide receiver position.
 

sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
A great athlete. lol

Jesus Christ. Since when do teams fear playing great athletes who aren't great football players? lol

It's a rare breed of fan who can talk football without their rooting interests making them sound like an idiot.
 

sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
You're talking about a guy who has more 40 plus yard TDs on his resume before the age of 25 than any player in the history of the league with the exception of Gale Sayers. Who he will pass next year.

The greatest home run hitter in the history of the NFL.

And people want to talk about an inferior talent like Miles Austin being better.

lol Cmon. Sometimes you just have to tip your cap to the other side. They got a great football player. I wish we had him.
 
Messages
46,859
Reaction score
5
You're talking about a guy who has more 40 plus yard TDs on his resume before the age of 25 than any player in the history of the league with the exception of Gale Sayers. Who he will pass next year.

The greatest home run hitter in the history of the NFL.

And people want to talk about an inferior talent like Miles Austin being better.

lol Cmon. Sometimes you just have to tip your cap to the other side. They got a great football player. I wish we had him.

This has nothing to do with homerism. If so, then no one would be suggesting that Nicks, Maclin, Steve Smith, etc are the better all around receivers as well.

It has to do with Jackson being one dimensional, whereas the other receivers in the division (other than Washington) are not.
 

sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
And the thing with Jackson, it's not like I want him to be this good. I loathe the Eagles. And I stated before his draft that he wouldn't pan out in the NFL. Too small.

But you have to admit when you're wrong. The guy is having an historic career.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom