2010 Season Game Threads Mega-Merge

[Sheik]

NO WE DID NOT. If you don't convert those turnovers into POINTS then it doesn't mean anything. If that's the case, then what number of turnovers was needed? Are you saying that if he had just at least gotten ONE TURNOVER in each of those two games... we would have won those two games? That's fucking ridiculous. Then you have to get into what type of turnover.

Yes we did, Laz. We gave away 7 points on a TURNOVER in Washington and lost by how much? We lost by 7 last week after giving up the ball 3 or 4 times and them getting how many of those 27 points off of turnovers?

Don't tell me that turnovers don't matter.

 

[Sheik]

Don't even think about creating a turnover, Defense. Laz doesn't think they are important.

 

[sbk92]

It was no body's fault on that play. Maybe Romo could have not thrown it so tight towards the sideline, but other than that it was a good throw and a good attempt by Bryant.

It was the QB's fault. He was clearly yards out of bounds. You don't throw that pass.

 

[Sheik]

Bryant was out of bounds before Romo threw it. If Romo knew it before he threw the ball he should have never thrown it.

 

[Cr122]

What the hell is Brooking thinking?

 

[Cr122]

Johnson is hurt.

 

[Sheik]

This game shouldn't be close as good as they're running the football.

 

[LAZARUS_LOGAN]

If we got a few turnovers in the first two games, odds are we're 2-0 right now.

There's no more important stat in football than your turnover ratio.

Based on what? What if a team is driving down the field and they are on our 15 yard line and we get an INT or a fumble recovery and return for minimal gain, but then fail to score on that turnover? How does that help the odds?

 

[Sheik]

Based on what? What if a team is driving down the field and they are on our 15 yard line and we get an INT or a fumble recovery and return for minimal gain, but then fail to score on that turnover? How does that help the odds?

We tok away 3 points and maybe 7, plus if we get a first down or two we can reverse the field position.

 

[LAZARUS_LOGAN]

It was the QB's fault. He was clearly yards out of bounds. You don't throw that pass.

Not really. Some WRs are able to adjust like Bryant almost did. Never said ti was a perfect pass.

 

[LAZARUS_LOGAN]

Now those kid of blocks by the Cowboys get penalized as block in the back.

 

[Sheik]

TD here and it leaves just enough time for Wade to call the dogs off and let them back in it to win with a last second FG.

 

[LAZARUS_LOGAN]

We tok away 3 points and maybe 7, plus if we get a first down or two we can reverse the field position.

Ok I understand that. But a 3 and out accomplishes the exact same thing on a different portuion of the field.

 

[sbk92]

Based on what?

Based on the history of the league.

I can't believe this is even up for debate. The most successful teams are on the plus side of the turnover battle.

 

[sbk92]

Ok I understand that. But a 3 and out accomplishes the exact same thing on a different portuion of the field.

No it doesn't.

Field position is at play. 3 and outs are not like turnovers.

 

[sbk92]

Horrible throw by Romo.

 

[Sheik]

Ok I understand that. But a 3 and out accomplishes the exact same thing on a different portuion of the field.

I see what you're saying, but turnovers are a huge no no and drain confidence a lot more than a 3 and out does, imo.

 

[SixisBetter]

I see what you're saying, but turnovers are a huge no no and drain confidence a lot more than a 3 and out does, imo.

plus there's the whole "we have the ball and they don't"thing.

 

[Cr122]

On Brooking again!!

 

[Cr122]

I'll take it.