2010 Season Game Threads Mega-Merge

[Sheik]

I know turnovers is a big deal for myou, but we didn't lose those two games because of lack of turnovers.

Yes we did.

When you lose the turnver battle you lose the game.

 

[LAZARUS_LOGAN]

I knew that was coming.

 

[Sheik]

Our fucking luck.

 

[sbk92]

Stupid of Romo to throw that.

 

[sbk92]

But more Bryant, please.

 

[Cr122]

Dumbest rule ever.

 

[Sheik]

I knew that was coming.

We lost because of a turnover in Washington. Look at the score. Choice gave the ball to the defense to score a TD.

Look at how many points we lost by last Sunday and how many points Chicago got off of turnovers. Turnovers are a huge part of the game.

 

[LAZARUS_LOGAN]

What about illegal contact after 5 yards by the defender?

 

[sbk92]

We'll be talking about that would be Bryant TD after the game when we lose. Could have been 14-3 at the half.

 

[Sheik]

That wasn't as bad of a throw as Roy made it look.

 

[LAZARUS_LOGAN]

Yes we did.

When you lose the turnver battle you lose the game.

NO WE DID NOT. If you don't convert those turnovers into POINTS then it doesn't mean anything. If that's the case, then what number of turnovers was needed? Are you saying that if he had just at least gotten ONE TURNOVER in each of those two games... we would have won those two games? That's fucking ridiculous. Then you have to get into what type of turnover.

 

[Cr122]

Fucking, Refs!

 

[sbk92]

If we got a few turnovers in the first two games, odds are we're 2-0 right now.

There's no more important stat in football than your turnover ratio.

 

[LAZARUS_LOGAN]

We'll be talking about that would be Bryant TD after the game when we lose. Could have been 14-3 at the half.

It was no body's fault on that play. Maybe Romo could have not thrown it so tight towards the sideline, but other than that it was a good throw and a good attempt by Bryant.

 

[LAZARUS_LOGAN]

We lost because of a turnover in Washington. Look at the score. Choice gave the ball to the defense to score a TD.

Look at how many points we lost by last Sunday and how many points Chicago got off of turnovers. Turnovers are a huge part of the game.

I understand that. But you are claiming that had we gotten turnovers, we would have won.

 

[sbk92]

Just don't over kick it, Buehler.

 

[Cr122]

:hide

 

[LAZARUS_LOGAN]

And anothert thing... they SCORED OFF OF THAT TURNOVER. Which like I said, means nothing in getting turnovers IF you don't score.

 

[sbk92]

That's all Buehler's problem is. He over kicks the football. He doesn't have to do that. He's got plenty of leg to kick the long ones.

 

[Cr122]

That will give him some Buefidence.